When looking at Andrew Jackson’s presidency, I would give him a -1 on a scale of +5 (being the best) and -5 (being the worst). I have based his overall presidency based on the five principles: virtuous people, independent people, homogeneous people, limited government, and American mission. I believe he is a -1 on the scale because yes he did manage to get some major things accomplished during his presidency like the Indian Removal, but he also ignored and never addressed other things that really hurt his overall presidency. Starting things off, when looking at principle number one, virtuous people, I believe that the people were virtuous but not for the right reasons. For example these people had to conform under Jackson out of fear. When Jackson imposed …show more content…
He vetoed a lot of bills that congress attempted to pass and in his time as president, he only passed one major bill. The Indian Removal Act of 1830 which generally was supported by most people except for the Indians. Finally fifthly, when looking at principle number five, American Mission, I believe that America at this time was not a happy place. Other countries did not look at America and wish to be here, especially while under Jackson’s rule. Therefore, I believe that the way Andrew Jackson rule should not serve as a good example as he attempted to take almost all control of those around him during his presidency. This restricted others from giving their ideas and even challenging Jackson. Overall, when looking at this scale and giving my input of how and if Andrew Jackson was able to fulfill these five principles, I give him a -1 on his presidency. He attempted to completely control this party because he believed that he outweighed the Constitution and even kicked a large group of indians off their own land which angered these people who were technically his people as
“I've got big shoes to fill, this is my chance to do something, I have to seize the moment” is what Jackson once said but did he really do the best job when he was president? Andrew Jackson was a villain because he was apart of the Indian Removal Act, Trail Of Tears, made national bank changes and believed in Manifest Destiny.
Andrew Jackson, seventh president of the United States of America, can be debated as either a good president or bad president. But if one were to weigh out the positives and negatives of Andrew Jackson’s presidency, one would realize that his positives outweigh his negatives for a variety of historic facts. Andrew Jackson was a good president because he represented the majority of America’s people by being a common, prevented a civil war when South Carolina threatened to secede from the nation, and because he technically found or instigated the two major parties used in America today (Democratic and Republican). Many Jackson oppositionists despise him because of he is a hypocrite, however America was founded on hypocrisy so as an
I agree that with the rating of sixth overall that Andrew Jackson received for his presidency. Andrew Jackson was the seventh president of the United States and a member of the Democratic Party. Jackson made many positive and negative decisions as the president of the United States. Andrew Jackson expanded the power of the president and he also expanded democracy during his time as the president of the United States.
The Age of Jackson was a key indicator of what Jackson is really classified as. The first order of business that Jackson did as President was to create the Spoils System. The Spoils System is where Andrew Jackson fired most, if not all, of his workers in the government. This then allowed Jackson to hire his friends and supporters to work for him in the government. Many people saw this as unfair since it resulted in uneducated citizens working in the government. A positive thing for the citizens of America was the Indian Removal Act. This is where gold was found located in the state of Georgia, where the Native Americans homeland was located. General Jackson tried to force out Natives to retrieve the gold, but treaties declared the land as the Natives property. Because of this, a case between the Natives and the state of Georgia was held in the supreme court. The ruling was in the Natives favor, but Jackson went against the ruling. He then forced the Natives out of their land. Because the Natives were forced out of their land, they had to march all the way from Georgia to Oklahoma, this was called the Trail of Tears. Jackson was somewhat generous since he supplied the Natives with some supplies and money, but it was not nearly enough to last them their whole journey. Many of the Natives died from starvation or from the cold temperatures on this devastating march. The Seminole Indians refused to give up land, though which resulted in a seven year war between them and the United States. Many of the Seminoles ended up hiding in the Everglades, or were forced west. As you can see, the Age of Jackson was actually a cruel and gruesome time for many, but people still somehow saw Jackson as a hero during that
Andrew Jackson ran for president during the 1824 election. Due to the Corrupt Bargain, Jackson lost to Quincy Adams. However, the next election, Jackson won. When he took office, the Spoils System would take place. Government officials when George Washington was president had been fired because they did not have the same views as Andrew Jackson. In addition, he set up a Kitchen Cabinet of informal advisors to assist him. In 1833, Jackson vetoed the Bank Bill because he felt like the bank only benefitted the wealthy residents. This veto and all of his other vetoes, he would veto more bills than all the presidents before him would. During his presidency, he would use a lot of power while changing the view of a president.
One way Andrew Jackson was able to transform the presidency was through his unconventional use of veto power. Jackson “vetoed twelve bills, more than his six predecessors combined” (Feller). Of these vetoes, he executed the first “pocket veto” in American history. In other words,
He issued high tarrifs, as high as 33 percent on imports, to protect American manufactorers from cheaper foriengers. Many people repsected him for trying to keep American goods in America and protect his manufactorers. But some states like South Carolina suffered and Jackson ignored them. The next act that Jackson did was attempting to destroy the banks. As he saw before the banks were a disator waiting to happen. Many people supported him, not the whigs, on this idea and made him very popular. Jackson took steps to destroy it. The economy took a small dip it shot back up, the national debt had dissapered and for the first and only time between 1835 and 1873, the governemnt had a financial surplus. After his term he wanted Martin Van Buren for president. Jackson laid the foundation down for democracy and made very important changes that made the economy affluent. He appealed to the common man and proved that he did. He was best known for killing the national bank, being the first non-aristocratic president, and creating Jacksonian
Jackson firmly believed in quality of economic opportunity, which he showed several times throughout his presidency. He believed the national bank helped the wealthy elite and that state banks would help the common man more. Also by
Andrew Jackson was probably one of the most powerful and influential presidents during his time at the white house. He was hated, yet loved by many. Jackson was an American soldier, who gained fame as a general in the U.S and served in both houses of Congress. He was soon elected the seventh president of the United States. After Jackson took charge, he wanted immediate change as to how the government was being run. For starters, he came with a new idea of voting. Allowing the common people to vote for whom they believe was the right person for the job. Before the introduction to
The major accomplishments of Jackson during his presidency pertain to his rural upbringing and democratic beliefs. To name a couple of Jackson’s memorable accomplishments and decisions not
When Jackson came to power in 1829 he promised much, advocating equality, democratic change, morality in government and true representation. However Jackson's success or failure as a president is shown by what he actually did. The thesis of this essay is that despite the variety of issues faced by Jackson he didn't actually bring about much change. This could be interpreted as failure but his legacy as a strong president, as a symbol of US democracy, and also the devotion of the people to him, does perhaps counter the failings. Failure might constitute not meeting one's promises but Jackson's ambiguity and inconsistency on many issues make it hard to judge his performance. I would not say he was completely successful or unsuccessful but
Andrew Jackson helped to provide for a strong protection of popular democracy and individual liberty to the United States. Andrew Jackson known as the people’s president held a strong emotion in the states right’s which advocated to the increase of executive power. President Andrew Jackson was good for his country, because he provided certain decisions that helped form America into a better place than where it was before. President Andrew Jackson showed significant positives towards the people of the United States. President Andrew Jackson’s creation of the Democratic Party still exists today. His great efforts to eliminate the Bank of the United States helped to pay off all the national debts in America.
Father and son historians, Arthur M. Schlesinger and Arthur M. Schlesinger Jr., asked some of the top historians in the country to rank each president in the categories Great, Near Great, Average, Below Average, and Failure based on their time in the White House (Schlesinger Jr. 179). The official ranking lists Andrew Jackson as the fifth best president overall, which landed him a comfortable spot in the “Near Great” category. Andrew Jackson’s presidency belongs in a much lower category due to his immoral character, unilateral decision-making, and his unimpressive presidency relative to that of other presidents.
Andrew Jackson is considered by many to be the first modern president that we have today. He considered the presidency as not just someone who just presides over everything but as one who’s job it is to represent the citizens that lived there. He believed that the presidency was much like being a congressman but instead of just looking out for in the interests of your district, he had to make decisions that would affect the entire country. This would lead him to veto many bills that he considered detrimental to the United States
If I lived back in the Jacksonian Era, my view of the man would be very unpleasant. These actions are something that a tyrant would do, like King Louis XIV or Muammar Gaddafi, who totally ignored their nations’ rights. I believe Andrew Jackson ignored two branches of the United States government; the legislative and the judicial branches. He vetoed laws that he believes that hurt the country, but in my eyes, the Bank was always needed, especially in their time of economic crisis. He also ignored the decision of the Supreme Court in the Cherokee vs. Georgia case, something that a President should not do. I do acknowledge Andrew Jackson’s protection of democracy and