From the 1820s to the 1840s the North and South’s economic resources were very different. The North was mostly manufactured while the South’s was agriculture based. The North was much more industrialized during this time. They were manufacturing wool and textile goods. While the South was farming, its main crop was cotton. They both had many differences eventually leading to the Civil War. African Americans were used as slaves to produce the amount of cotton the world needed. The slaves wanted freedom they thought this was unfair, the slave masters had to control them from breaking free. The big challenge was power, masters and slaves both wanted something that benefited them own selves. Most of the African Americans accepted that they were
The North and South were very different from each other. Industrialization was happening in the North, while large-scale cotton planting was happening in the South. The South sold their crops to England in exchange for inexpensive factory-made goods produced in Europe. As a result of industrialization, Northern Factories began producing many of the goods that were already being produced in Europe. Thus, the North started to tax the South on any goods imported from Europe, so that the South would buy goods from the North. These unfair taxes angered the South, and contributed largely to its anti-North attitude (Civil War
The South heavily relied on slavery to keep their economy stable, although not their only source of money, but by abolishing slavery and making it illegal it would damage their economy quite badly. And so this caused a lot of tension between the North and South because they were very different economically. The South is much more agricultural, and is reliant upon exports as well. The North on the other hand is in complete contrast to the South. The North industrialised very fast and many people of poor background and some African-American succeeded and made a lot of money. It isn't very clear that if they had lived in the South if they could have achieved this much success, but those in the North faced a lot less discrimination compared to the South. "Because the economics of the dynamic industrializing North and the static agrarian South were incompatible, the two societies were on a collision course that led inexorably to war" (http://civilwartalk.com/threads/historians-evolving-views-of-civil-war-causality.21223/) Many historians agree that this was not a major cause. According to economic historian Lee A. Craig, "In fact, numerous studies by economic historians over the past several decades reveal that economic conflict was not an inherent condition of North-South
The difference between the North and South’s economy varied greatly. The South had a mainly agricultural economy while the North mainly focused on an industrial economy. It can be seen on the pi charts of the North and South’s economy that the North was more prosperous with their economy do to that fact that one and a half trillion dollars of manufactured goods were produced in the North while only one hundred fifty-five million dollars were produced in the South (Doc 2). The South made most of their money from crops but most importantly cotton. South was the top producer in cotton and it was a very popular crop to buy. The difference in economy between the North and South took a toll on the relationship between them. The difference in economies was a tension that was one event that led to the civil
In the time just before the Civil War, the United States was one of the most successful nations in the world. The United States had become the world’s leading cotton producing country and had developed industry, which would in the future, surpass that of Great Britain. Also, the United States possessed an advanced railroad and transportation system. However, despite its successes, the United States was becoming increasingly divided. The North and the South had many distinct differences in terms of their social, cultural, and economic characteristics that brought about sectionalism and, eventually, the Civil War.
Be that as it may, the principle fight between the North and South, and the most passionate one, was over the issue of subjugation. America was a horticultural country and products, for example, cotton were sought after around the globe. Cotton developed well in the southern atmosphere,
The North thought there shouldn’t be slavery, and the South thought there should be. This ended up causing the South to secede from the Union, which in turn caused the bloodiest war in American history to take place. After the Union won the war and slaves were freed shortly after, there was a great deal of bitterness from the South for a long time. For a long time after slavery was abolished, African Americans still didn’t have many rights. Not until the late 1900s were rights given to them. It took nearly 300 years for African Americans to be treated right, and sometimes they still
The civil war was fought between the northern and the southern states from 1861-1865, when the south left the union in 1860 to be able to protect the establishment of slavery. Hence, the United States was divided in two countries with the establishment in the North and the Confederate United States of America in the South. However, the difference between the two countries and the government didn’t allow the slavery in the territories or were not part of the same states. Indeed, the north had more advancement in technology, industry and agriculture, and weaponry. In contrast, the southern states resources were agriculture slaves who were forced to work as farm laborers. This led the southern states to be economically dependent on the slave’s work.
The Civil War was the culmination of a social, political, philosophical and economic crisis that began at the birth of the United States. The question of slavery had not ceased dividing the country since its foundation. In the 1850s, the question of the abolition of slavery became more and more important Discussions in the Congress and the press between the opponents and the defenders of slavery were ardent than ever. The southern states were anti-abolitionist because their economy was essentially based on cotton monoculture, which required a
The South wanted a small central government and slaves thats all. They did not like the North barging in with this new idea of taking away their “money” (slaves). They fought back in the decision of freeing slaves. The South wanted to be left alone to make their own laws and ways of government. The South was reliant on cotton just like the North was reliant on the government, politics, etc.
The years prior to Civil War were considered to be among the most hectic in the history of America, a time met by substantial changes which took place as America came of age. During this period, America was changed from an underdeveloped nation of just farmers and probably frontiersmen into a developed economic center. Major political fights during the pre-civil war period focused more on states’ rights. And diligently tied to the issue of states’ rights, was the dispute over slavery. Northerners did not really want social and political equivalence for black people, therefore; they sought only their liberation.
In 1850, the quality of African American people’s lives depended largely on whether they lived in the Northern or Southern states. States in the North had all ended slavery by then, so black people who lived in those states lived free. But, in the South, slavery was common. Most slaves worked on large farms called plantations, growing the South’s primary crop - cotton. In the 1850s, the South was producing 4 million bales of cotton a year, the vast majority of which was produced using slave labor. All of this cotton brought wealth to the South. In fact, if the South was treated as its own nation in 1850, it would have been the 4th richest nation in the world. The economy depended on cotton, and therefore slaves.
The North’s actions of abolishing slavery and enacting tariffs caused the South to fight in hopes of preserving their way of life and economy. Plantations in the South were only successful because of slavery. Without the slaves helping them create the abundance of cotton, the South would have no economy. The country’s economy would be greatly altered if slavery was eliminated both from a consumer and producer perspective. When the North did announce that they wanted to completely eradicate slavery, the South was taken aback due to the fact that the whole country would not function without slavery and the cotton produced. The North wanted the South to industrialize but the South replied “… we must ever continue to be, wholly dependent upon agriculture and commerce (South Caroline Protest Against the Tariff of 1828).” The climate in the South did not allow for the same industrialization to occur as it did in the North. Plantations and their productions of cash crops were booming in the South and the northern frontier was too small of a market, therefore leading them to sell to foreign countries. This caused the North to enact tariffs and in order to prevent the South from being too successful and lose them as a market. The North ended up petrifying the Southerners into fighting a war in order to preserve their way of life and thriving economy.
During the nineteen hundreds the United States of America was still a newborn in the world compared to surrounding countries. After World War One and Two the United States proved themselves to be strong and capable. However, through these wars there were other social struggles. The country was formed upon slavery. In the south the main way of life was agriculture. Farmers had large plantations and there weren't modern machines to make the job easier. People had to harvest by hand or use hand tools. With such large plantations this was nearly impossible for a few men alone. So they began importing, buying, and selling slaves. The slaves were African-Americans. However, the Civil War, while it wasn't originally due to slavery, became the moment that slavery was fought against. People's view began to change about the African people. After the Civil War blacks were freed and able to make their own living in the country. Except, not everyone liked this
In general, the American Civil War is thought to have started mostly because of a discrepancy on how to handle slavery. The difference in opinion is most likely a result of political, economic, and religious tension within the country. Before a civil war was even thought about, southern leaders spoke of freeing their slaves and many predicted the demise of slavery due to a lack of efficiency. In 1793 with Eli Whitney’s cotton gin, cotton soon became the most popular southern crop leading to a revival of interest in slavery. With cotton, the south gained a large amount of profit and this benefitted northern shippers while Great Britain also depended on this cotton. Thus the Cotton Kingdom which developed at least half of the world’s cotton grew and gave cotton growers much power (The American Pageant 350-351). While slaves became popular again, they still basically had no political or civil rights (359). Eventually, certain groups realized that the ethical rights of the slaves were being violated and abolitionist groups as well as antislavery societies came about (362). Eventually, in response to the anti-slavery, slave owners responded by justifying slavery with the Bible as well as Aristotle (365). With this began the split between pro-slavery and anti-slavery sections of America, mostly a split between the
The economic conflict was one of the main causes between the North and the South. There was a huge difference between the two, due to the differences of their geography. The North was leaning towards an industrial economy; however, the South was heading towards an agricultural economy. This greatly divided the nation as it created a variety of issues between the two. For instance, “ There is no demand, … for the productions of the Southern industry; … and that we are dependent on Northern capitalists … to build our railroads, canals and other public improvement (Helper, 1857). For this reason, the South couldn’t invest as much unlike the North because the South was limited to only plantations. Additionally, the South couldn’t contribute to literature or arts because it had a different industry from the North. This created more tension because the North contributes more and the