preview

Sherlock Holmes Research Paper

Better Essays

Short synopsis:
The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes – Silver Blaze, was about an investigation derived from the death of a Famous horse trainer (John Straker) and the perceived abduction of Champion Horse – Silver Blaze. The relevant evidence presented leans towards the guilt of a stranger that visited the stable earlier that evening. Concluding, Sherlock Holmes investigation supported the assailant was someone who trusted and had full access to the stable area. The drugged trainer, non-barking dogs, and sound asleep, other stable men were all important clue. Holmes theory and explanations discovered the teacher was responsible for this tragedy. Straker made a deal with Silver Blazes competitor’s coach to throw the upcoming race. When Straker …show more content…

Leveraging his experience and enhance critical thinking skills to investigate the discrepancies. His inductive reasoning leads to the validation the criminal was someone they all knew. Straker developed a plan that leads to this to get an illegal financial gain. While going through the logical clues and studying the surrounding environment, he realized Silver Blazes competitor’s horses stable was near. His inquisitive mind to it a step further and questioned trainer to justify his thoughts. Sherlock Holmes took the meditate on the clue connections and mentally remove himself to allow his mind to …show more content…

He expressed through relevant observations; some suggested an argument about gypsies and other potential criminals. Holmes spoke aloud to Watson about his observations and evidence. The telling helps, Holmes says. "Nothing clears up a case so much as stating it to another person" (Magpie, 2016). This deductive reasoning eliminated justification that the gypsies were the thieves.
In your opinion, what are some of the ways that Holmes uses and doesn't use to arrive at the correct answers that he does? (Include class and past research)
Despite the obvious clues leaning towards a first logical conclusion the stranger murdered the trainer, this was not his conclusion. As he walks with Watson, he takes a break to play back the story in his head. He spends the time to think about why and who it would benefit from the disappearance of Silver Blaze. He also tells Watson he thought aloud, to do further analysis. When questioning people, he used an aggressive questioning manner that would force a person to confess. He used mental tactics to get the answer he needed to solve the mystery. Once they cooperated as he talked with them, he paid attention to their body language and actively listened. His personal experience solving mysteries highlights his effective questioning of the subjects to gain cooperation and confessions. Personal experience is a skill learned not by formal research.

Get Access