Why Attending College Is Not For Everyone

W.J. Reeves, a professor of English at the Brooklyn College of the City University of New York, offers his idea of college being too easy to access and with that low retention standards. He begins by stating that 15 million Americans attend college and of those 15 million, half should not be enrolled. Reeves believes that students entering college fresh out of high school are not ready for the challenges college will bring to them due to grade inflation while being in high school. He also argues against colleges in regards that they do not influence one 's ability to expand their intelligence and readiness for the workforce.

For many years, standardized tests have been a pillar of college admissions. Students are persuaded to take the Scholastic Assessment Test (SAT) or the American College Test (ACT) because colleges believe the scores can predict an applicant’s academic success after high school. However, an increasing number of colleges have made reporting test scores optional due to inconsistencies with the tests, many of which have been emphasized by students. These inconsistencies and other problems with test distribution have led to increasing demands for standardized testing to be reformed or become optional in the admissions process. Standardized testing should be eliminated as a criterion for college applicants because the tests have made education less significant, have made scores vary among students with similar academic abilities, and have not contributed a noticeable improvement to children’s intelligence.

By now, everyone has come to the conclusion that SAT is a flawed system. The test is designed to determine the future of high school students. Its job is to capture a snapshot of what a student has learned over the course of their academic career. Unfortunately, this is not what happens. Instead of treating a student’s score as just a snapshot, colleges treat a student’s score as their complete academic intelligence. What the system fails to realize is that not all students are good test takers. A student could study for weeks, but when the curator says “You may begin” their mind goes blank. Furthermore, the education system has become too dependant on the SAT to calculate a student’s intelligence. The real emphasis should be on the student’s GPA, essays, extracurriculars, volunteer work, and how much they challenged themselves. Focusing on these aspects allows the college to review an applicant’s work ethic.

College is not for everyone because some students cannot confront the academic or financial challenges college brings. Students should apply to as many grants, scholarships or financial aid to be capable to pay off materials and charges for their college classes. There are many ways college is not for everyone. Many young adults don’t comprehend the expenses that is necessary between books and other living investment. Financial obstacles such as food, rent, attire, and other things influence college students who are not adapted to making payments for these types of things on their own. Pharinet states “It is estimated that in the U.S., 50% of students who begin college never graduate because they are not are ready for the academic and financial challenges of college or do not have the desire to learn” (635. Practical Argument: A Text and Anthology). In

Most people think that the SAT shows college readiness but does it really? Why SAT scores are meaningless: because the words

College is a way to experience different types of studies, and find what we have in interest in or what we don't have an interest in. You'll never know what you may like, until you try, which is why I think college is a great idea. "In short, there have always been strong authoritarian prohibitions on abstract, open-ended education, arguments grounded in fear that such education would disrupt the social order and should be replaced by more practical, measurable training". I believe that we all have different opinions on what type of education we want to have. Although I think everyone should go to college, it isn't always easy finding the money to do so. In that case, going to a college that only focuses on your future career isn't horrible. When a student enters a college course and focuses on one major, but then in the middle of the year, change their major, the teachers and professors will most likely feel very accomplished. These teachers want their students to try new things and new studies, which is why college is so important. Yes, college can be very expensive, but when you're getting an education that most kids won't ever get, it's very worth it. It's worth it to learn new things and improve the world and our

When preparing for college, one thing students all across America can agree upon is the hatred of standardized testing. The stress of scoring high is one that weighs heavy on all students’ shoulders because it will directly impact their futures. Time spent preparing for these tests often feel like a huge waste when the “goal-score” is not achieved, or when a high score is given and the student still does not get into the educational institution of his or her choice. Often schools’ funding is based upon test scores and that directly impacts the education a student will receive. Schools who wish to do well on these tests for their future students will spend an unhealthy amount

College is a scam. Students spend twelve years of free education to learn important skills and to increase literacy rates. Majority of jobs in the United States requires a high school diploma. People think in order to expand their knowledge in a career they need higher education, which of course they have to pay thousands of dollars for. However, what people do not realize college does not guarantee a job, they can become successful and intelligent without it, and tuition leaves them in debt.

In one way or another, every individual in the United States has been a student in their life. A large majority of those people have most likely been forced into submission by their instructors to take a test in order to gauge their intellectual abilities. Quite often these tests can be more of a burden than they are beneficial. Why should a student’s capability to perform well in college level academics be based upon a test score? In reality, standardized testing alone is not a reliable source to determine the level of one’s college readiness or intelligence.

Seven times a year, millions of students head to their designated test centers with handfuls of No. 2 pencils to take the SAT or ACT for the college admissions process. In this nerve wracking and stressful situation, students are expected to flawlessly demonstrate all important concepts that high school has taught them and perform to the best of their abilities in order to get into college. In recent years, there has been much speculation and dispute over the these examinations. The truth is, standardized tests to not accurately depict a student 's knowledge on a particular subject. Removing the standardized test requirement creates an equal and fair chance for all applicants by removing the socioeconomic unfairness, and forces admissions

Why is a College Education not valuable? College isn’t for everyone because not every job needs a college education. College education isn’t valuable because some just wanna work after high school. College graduates usually don’t get a job they enjoy. Also people fail to graduate, they get college debt, and not all job professions require a college education.

Many individuals see college as the only way to ensure success in life. Consequently, many of these people don’t realize that hundreds of extremely successful individuals dropped out, or never attended college. In an article on biography.com titled, “Steve Jobs Biography”, Steve Jobs, co-founder of Apple Computers, dropped out of college after only 6 months. Other affluent college dropouts include the creator of Facebook, Mark Zuckerburg, the co-founder of Microsoft, Bill Gates, and fashion icon, Ralph Lauren. The current net worth of these individuals ranges from five to eighty billion dollars. Clearly, this is much more than most people with a college

These standardized tests might be good indicators of who will do well within a school system, but they don’t necessarily predict one’s future success in life. And yet, colleges continue to give considerable weight to test scores in their admissions process. But these scores aren’t a good predictor of a student’s potential. Some students are just better test takers than others or have more preparation. Several SAT and ACT prep classes are offered from various companies and individual tutors in the area, giving affluent students a better chance to improve their scores. Some would argue that these students are buying a higher score.

The much-anticipated tests that high school students dread taking to get into an universitycollege are the SAT and ACT. These standardized tests are outdated and need to be abolished on the reliance of admission requirement to universities. One test should not measure a student’s intellectual and academic ability. There are students out there that can not score high enough for university college admissions, but can surely succeed in everything else a college has to offer. In college, a student is not only served with a challenge of test-taking, but also much more. Endless assignments and organization skills have their serve in college too. Students can only succeed with having the willpower of pushing through when times get hard in college.

“Like the global economy, today’s students are driven by ideas and innovations. They should not be reduced down to, or defined by, a single test score” (Schuler). In the present time, the majority of colleges look at one’s ACT score as the key to admitting the student into their institute of higher learning. A 24 minimum composite score on the ACT is a requirement to be accepted to most universities in the United States. This prerequisite is not fair to the students applying to these colleges for many reasons. One these reasons is many students suffer with test anxiety and the ACT does not show one’s full knowledge. Another set back is students can not always afford to pay for the ACT. Thus