preview

Why Does Oates Political Views Come Through Her Characters?

Decent Essays

1. In Foxfire, Oates’ political views come through her characters. Does the same occur in Black Water with the Senator? 2. Why does Kelly speak about the past and seem to disassociate for so long instead of trying harder to escape? 3. Why would Oates choose to retell this story that is based on a true one from the victim’s point of view?

Critical lens, genre conventions, literary movement, and/or any literary characteristics helpful for analysis this week (explain each, briefly):
Throughout Foxfire, communist and capitalist ideology clash. Legs, a staunch supporter of communism, thinks that men and capitalism are linked. Men are evil because of capitalism and capitalism is evil because of men. Oates is a very politically-active writer and she herself is critical of capitalism. Her personality is shown through both Maddy and Legs. Legs represents Oates sometimes “extreme” political views while Maddy represents her non-violent, intellectual personality. Foxfire also brings up important issues of female equality. She tweets and speaks a lot about sexual violence and victim blaming, something that many character in Foxfire go through. Because women are most often the ones blamed, …show more content…

The Senator exhibits characteristics of the patriarchy through the way he behaves. None of his actions have consequences that reflect back on him, they only hurt others. This is particularly evident in the car crash in which The Senator walks away unscathed with no responsibility for the act even though he was drinking. Kelly, the female victim, is blamed because she “grabbed the wheel while she was drunk.” Moreover, the words The Senator says to Kelly are extremely condescending and, while he does lust after her, make her feel inferior. This novella parallels the story of the Chappaquiddick Incident in which senator Ted Kennedy drove his car off of a cliff with Mary Jo Kopechne inside. She died and Kennedy was barely

Get Access