Why Guns Should Be Banned Research Paper

Guns are used for protection, power, and sporting purposes. Guns are beneficial to society when used by trained professionals, such as the police and military. When in untrained hands, however, guns can cause death to friends, neighbors, family members and children. Due to their small size, weight and concealability, handguns pose some of the greatest risks to the public, ranging from accidental death in the home to mass shootings in public places. Consequently, private ownership of handguns should be banned by the US government due to their irresponsible use in murders and accidental deaths, the increased dangers to others caused by their concealability, and the availability of alternative, non-lethal self-defense weapons.

There are currently over 200 million guns in use, which means obtaining a gun in the United States mustn't be that hard. If gun usage could be regulated more by banning certain unneeded weapons to the public and requiring a more in depth background check, than miss usage of guns, and deaths caused by them would decrease. However, already existing laws need to be enforced and harsher penalties for those who don't follow the laws. If the country would agree on certain legislation for gun control, than The United States could be a much safer

Over the past couple of years, being able to access a gun has been too easy for criminals. They have been able to easily pass background checks. This is why there needs to be stronger background checks to protect people from criminals. Also, gun laws do not need to be too strong so that no one can protect themselves. “In 2002 at the Appalachian School of Law [in Grundy, Virginia]. Hearing shots, two students went to their cars, got their guns and restrained the shooter until police arrested him”(Guns Save Lives). This is an example of why having guns could help. If there were laws that prevented these 2 students to own guns, the whole situation could have been worse. There could have been more deaths but instead, since they had guns, they were able to control the situation and protect themselves. Lastly, Americans have always had the right to bear arms. “The right to bear arms has been a long American tradition. From the time the colonists settled on North American soil, Americans have held weapons to protect themselves”(The History of the Right to Bear Arms). If there were always laws then America would not have been America. Changing this would just lead more people to be mad and cause more problems. It will be better off if the laws remain the same. Limiting the amount of gun laws will allow people to own a gun and protect themselves and having stricter background checks will make it harder for a criminal to acquire a

Banning guns will not keep the number of deaths and crimes down. Just because there is a law put in place dose not mean everyone will follow it .For instance if a gun law was made all the criminals would still have guns .That leaves us law

Gun violence has gotten out of hand. People are able to get them and use them on others with little to any resistance. Although many people think the laws should be changed to fit this generation, it’s harder than it sounds. It takes a lot of thought and agreement to amend laws. Even if they could be amended to being stricter, all citizens wouldn't be willing to follow them. Stricter gun control laws, which would be difficult to agree on, would not be effective in controlling gun ownership/availability and would be hard to enforce.

It is important to take caution when addressing a topic of high controversy, such as racism in our society as compared to racism in societies from hundreds of years ago. Arguments may stem from a simple comparison of the two separate time periods, with some defending the behaviors of the past, while others claim there is no excuse, whatever the year may be, to discriminate against another race. A commonly utilized source for either side of this argument is highly acclaimed literature involving the topic of race, such as Joseph Conrad’s Heart of Darkness. So much controversy surrounds this novel because of the numerous and mighty subjects it tackles, consciously or not, ranging from imperialism to race to gender

It has been statistically proven that those who have committed previous crimes or misdemeanors are more likely to commit future crimes with a gun (Barrett). While there are laws that prevent certain criminals from buying or owning guns, there are few. Also, many criminals find a way to steal legally owned guns. While this is not the owners fault since they were law-abiding citizens, the criminal was still able to get access to a gun, especially if that gun was previously owned by a family or friend. Stricter gun laws would make it harder for criminals to get guns which would help decrease the number of burglaries, thefts, and homicides that occur in the United States. Even though adding stricter gun laws towards criminals can help the crime and violence rate, it is still not going to prevent others from using it to commit a crime. People who are committing a crime for the first time are still a problem. They may have legally acquired their gun , but it is still being used for a crime. In 2012, 49 of the 62 guns used in mass shootings were obtained legally (Barrett). These are the people that lawmakers need to watch out

Gun control is a law that controls how guns are sold and used, and who can own them. Allowing people to possess and use a gun with legal documents in the United States is legal. There have been arguments on whether or not is should be legal to own a gun as some people see it as beneficial and others do not. It is believed that guns are beneficial to have, and they are there because we need to be able to protect ourselves. We should not allow the government to have power over gun control for many reasons including the loss of tradition of hunting, not being able to protect ourselves, and simply because of the second amendment.

Unfortunately, many people possess guns would should not posses one. However I do not see it feasible to strengthen guns laws. I believe that there should be stronger penalties for people who are caught with a gun illegally and stronger penalties for people who are or threaten violence with a gun. This would make people think twice about smuggling a gun, or carry them when they are not supposed to. This might also influence Congress to pass a law for a stronger background check on people purchasing a gun, which would satisfy both sides of this argument. A stronger penalty for gun offenders might cause the amount of violence without a gun to rise a

There are a lot of different opinions on gun control. Some people think we should have gun control and strongly support it. I for one am not one of those people. I strongly believe that gun control would not work. Guns are not weapons they are tools used to protect your self, it is not the fault of a good samaritan that an unlawful samaritan uses them in the wrong ways. Guns are not the problem it is the people that get a hold of them. A gun can not fire a bullet its self just like a car can not drive its self.

Gun laws will not prevent tragedies such as the Las Vegas Massacre. The people who would do that will still get a gun even if it is illegal, they are already committing a terrible crime, getting a gun, even if it is illegal, will be the easy part. As for the many citizens who would follow the law, and not have a gun, will have nothing to protect themselves and their loved ones. Gun Reform will not solve problems for the United States, only create more and bigger problems.

There is a debate that is going on over the Gun Control laws and background checks. Many people have different views across the country on the issue. I am completely with the choice to make it a lot harder for people to obtain any weapons. I would support laws So making sure that gun storesthey would have to do further looking into people's backgrounds and mental states. AuthoritiesPeople would have to make sure that they enforce the laws not just change them. I think this would be a very good choice and would help cut down on some of these mass shooting from happening. I think it would encourage the American people to start getting involved and help out and report anything they can to help stop any violence.

Gun control recently has become a more serious problem in the eyes of the government. It is true that guns kill people, but so do bombs and car crashes. Guns do not shoot themselves, someone has pull the trigger. The problem with guns is not that they exist, but that people have started to misuse them more and more. Taking away guns would cause more problems than keeping them would. Guns are not just used for harming people, hunting also requires guns. Hunting is a very popular hobby in America and taking them away would cause a massive uproar. The second amendment states that we have the right to bear arms, by taking guns away the government would be taking away one our basic human rights. Also, guns are misused

What is it about gun ownership that frightens the government? Would passing gun control REALLY result in fewer crimes? In my opinion taking the guns away from American citizens will not only take away their self-defense, but it will also allow the criminals to get away with more knowing that their target is no endangerment to them without any kind of firearm. United States citizens should have the right to gun ownership for self-defense and assured safety.

We’re looking at the difference between Romanesque cathedrals and Gothic cathedrals. I know you all are so excited to learn what a flying buttress is because I know I was. Spoiler alert, it is nothing like what it sounds like. It’s much more cool and innovative, which is what these two periods were all about. Taking knowledge from the past and improving it.