Legalization of Drugs Drugs, drugs they are everywhere. Gore Vidal, famous writer wrote the article “Drugs”. This is an article stating why Vidal believes all drugs should become legalized. The famous writer Theodore Dalrymple wrote an article called “Don’t Legalize Drugs”? This article is about why Dalrymple believes drugs should not be legalized. Katrina Heuvel, (a famous writer) wrote the article “Why it’s Always Been Time to Legalize Marijuana”. This article is about why Heuvel believes that Marijuana should have been legalized a long time ago. Drugs have been used for many years now, for medical, mental, physical, and personal issues. Legalizing drugs could be what we need help, save more lives after all. Vidal believes that all drugs …show more content…
Vidal’s style of writing provides us with examples and explanation. He even gives us examples of his personal life and how he tried almost every drug, but managed not to like any of them therefore he did not get addicted. Dalrymple’s writing tends to get partly off topic. There are parts in the article that are confusing with the point that it seems Dalrymple is trying to make. Although he gets off topic part of the time his style of writing is shown through facts. Dalrymple needs to provide more examples and explanations. He needs to put more information of why he does not want them legalized. Also he does not come right out and say that he does not want drugs legalized. He needs to be more straightforward with why he doesn’t want them legalized and actually state it in the article. Although Vidal, and Dalrymple’s style and opinion on the legalization of drugs are different they are both in a way also part of Havel’s opinion on the legalizing on drugs. She too provides us with explanations and …show more content…
For example, not everyone would become addicted to drugs but most would for the simple fact that by making drugs legal more people would want to do drugs. Since they know that they can buy them legally. I for one do not want to be someone who lives in a society full of drug addicts. We would have to be insane to legalize drugs in our state for the simple fact that if we legalize drugs then we would be saying that we were okay with our society becoming a society full of more drug addicts. Although part of us would have to insane to want to legalize drugs, the other part of us would have to be insane not to. For example, if we were to legalize drugs we would be able to use them for medical purposes that could help save people’s
The passage by Stephen Chapman “Legal Drugs Unlikely to Foster Nation of Zombies” concludes that drugs should be legalized. The question then remains, would the population become drug fueled zombies? Chapman does not believe this would occur and makes various cases for how drugs are not necessarily bad, but rather it is their prohibition and the legalities of restricted usage that deteriorate society. He believes that people have the means to control themselves and their usage of drugs. The problems with crime, gangs, and other illegal activities are as a result of government and societal restrictions placed on drugs. These issues place undue pressures on police, government, prisons, and society by way of expenditures, societal stigmas, and emergency service constraints. Chapman argues that the legalization of drugs would not lead to more addiction nor increased consumption. He presents an argument to weaken his oppositions stance (strawman fallacy) that shows how poll results suggest only a small percentage of people would indulge in drugs, who were not already using them, if they became legal. Chapman uses a
In sociology, the definition of a drug is “any chemical substance that has a direct affect on the user’s physical, psychological, and/or intellectual functioning” (“Drugs” 3). According to this definition, many people may argue that the United States is a pro-drug society because of its legalization of alcohol, tobacco, and pharmaceuticals, however I believe that the United States is an anti-drug society. Although the United States has legalized tobacco, alcohol, and pharmaceuticals, there are many drugs that are still illegal. It can be assume that these illegal drugs they are dangerous and somehow poses a threat to society, but its illegalization has more to do with economics and power more than anything else. According to the film, “A Marijuana
Proponents on the legalization of drugs believe if drugs were to become legal; the black market worth billions of dollars would become extinct, drug gangsters would disappear, addicts would stop committing crimes to support their habit and the prison system would not be overwhelmed with a problem they cannot defeat. The decriminalization of drugs will only make illegal drugs cheaper, easier to get and more acceptable to use. “The U.S. has 20 million alcoholics and alcohol misusers, but only around 6 million illegal drug addicts. If illegal drugs were easier to obtain, this figure would rise”(Should Drugs be decriminalized? No.November 09, 2007 Califano Joseph A, Jr).”
For many years, a real push has been looming on the idea of legalizing now illegal drugs. This has become a hot debate throughout nations all over the world, from all walks of life. The dispute over the idea of decriminalizing illegal drugs is and will continue on as an ongoing conflict. In 2001, Drug decriminalization in all drugs, including cocaine and heroin, became a nationwide law in Portugal (Greenwald). Ethan Nadelman, essayist of “Think again: Drugs,” states his side of the story on the continuing criminalization of hard drugs, in which he stand to oppose. Whether it is for the good of human rights or not, decriminalizing drugs may be a good head start for a new beginning.
Drug policy is a crucial topic in the country today. Substance abuse, as well as drug-related crime rates, are a huge problem. This is a fact. The way to fix the problem of substance abuse, however, is widely disagreed upon. Some think that stricter laws regarding drug possession and use would solve the problem, while others believe that loosening the restrictions would be a better option. The issue of legalizing drugs, especially marijuana, is one that is debated all the time. In fact, in 1995, a survey was conducted on the most important policy issues and eighty five percent of the country placed drugs at the top of the list (Falco 1996). Many states are actually beginning to decriminalize, and even
If drugs were legalized, it will forever affect the world. It will not only affect people now but people in the future. Vidal talks about the war on drugs and government at the end of his essay. He states that “nothing sensible will be done” and it will only get “worse”. What would only get worse is if drugs were actually legalized and people began to use them more and more. If the government keeps fighting the war against drugs, a better solution will come up to end drug use and drug addiction. Eventually drugs could be belittled. Vidal mentions that “Every man, has the power (should have the power), to kill himself is he chooses.”. This is a true statement but his way of using this sentence, I disagree with. If a person is choosing to become a drug
My team and I evaluated a case where legalizing drugs would bring a greater happiness to society and that a small population of drug users would get addicted. We believe that legalizations on hard drugs would lead to bad behavior and a spike in addiction rates. Specifically, on drugs like Alcohol, Cocaine, or Heroin, etc. As what Jeremy Bentham would say, “It is the greatest good to the greatest number”. We want everyone to be happy by having a healthy society and peaceful world. My group follows Bentham’s utilitarianism theory which it benefits the society. Making drugs illegal would benefit society as hole. Legalizing drugs would terminate families, increase crime, and money, health would take a sudden decline.
The legalization of all drugs considered illegal in the United States today would do more than any other act to eradicate current social and political problems. Though many would naturally think otherwise, legalizing drugs like marijuana, ecstasy, meth, cocaine, heroin, mushrooms, LSD, and DMT would cripple organized crime, majorly reduce death and injury from drug use, unclog the court system, and make these drugs much safer to use.
"Illegal Drugs (Issue)." Gale Encyclopedia of U.S. Economic History, edited by Thomas Carson and Mary Bonk, Gale, 1999. Research in Context, go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?p=MSIC&sw=w&u=leb32560&v=2.1&id=GALE%7CEJ1667500310&it=r&asid=478d868d69460945b0f8686011843bb5. Accessed 7 Apr.
Drug legalization is an enduring question that presently faces our scholars. This issue embraces two positions: drugs should not be legalized and drugs should be legalized. These two positions contain an array of angles that supports each issue. This brief of the issues enables one to consider the strengths and weakness of each argument, become aware of the grounds of disagreement and agreement and ultimately form an opinion based upon the positions stated within the articles. In the article “Against the Legalization of Drugs”, by James Q. Wilson, the current status of drugs is supported. Wilson believes if a drug such as heroin were legalized there would be no financial or medical reason to avoid heroin usage;
The rise of illegal drug use that began in the 1960s was accompanied by the growing opinion that drug use should be legalized. This feeling remained strong though the middle of the 1970s when the existing research on drugs such as marijuana and cocaine did not clearly point to health hazards. Those who favored legalization thought that certain drugs could be used responsibly by most people who would otherwise be law-abiding or even model citizens. In other words, they believed most drug use to be a victimless crime.
Thank you for reading and criticizing my paper! I see your reasoning why you do not support legalizing drugs because you believe that they can cause a lot of harm to people, but so does drinking alcohol or smoking cigarettes and they are legal for us to use and consume. America spending 51 billion a year to fight against drugs is idiotic because they can use that money help students pay for school, create more jobs, help families in poverty,and build shelters. People do not really know how harmful smoking cigarettes or hookah is but they still do it. People drink alcohol and this is the number one leading cause of preventable death in the US. We as adults should be allowed to make our own decision and should take the drugs at our own risks.
Drugs influence physical and psychical health, it destroys human from inside. Drugs disorganize brain , heart, liver, intestine work. And almost all of these disorders are irreversible. If drugs would be legalised, some people would buy it instead of usual anaesthetics even though it would make more harm than benefit. Death statistic of drug abuse is horrifying. About 30% of drug addicts die. And this percentage would increase if drugs would be legalised. Also, usage of drugs is a cause of many diseases, like AIDS, hepatitis, cancer, mental trouble.
Drug use is part of human nature, but the unimaginable wealth involved leads to the corruption of the police, judges, and elected officials. There is no reason to have the government regulating what goes into an individual’s body. An extreme case of what we’re letting the government do is letting them take away our own self, an individual’s ownership over his own body. I think it’s in everyone’s interest to legalize all drugs, since this war is going nowhere, letting
“ We realize that drug addiction is a sickness, but it is also a crime” according to Pam Bondi. As we all know drug abuse is a big problem that is not often discussed. The reason we do not discuss it because we tend to hide things that cause a mad image or problem in our society. But the issue is much bigger. The legalization of drugs would improve many things such as how the government would have control over its cost and sales, the decrease of crime rates and the way we treat the people in our community who seek help.