She waited outside the cramped room with her sheet music in her shaking hands. A number was called and she checked to make sure it was hers; it was. She backed away from the wall and walked in the open door. She sat on the bench, wiped her sweaty hands on her dress, and waited. Just get this over with, she thought. From personal experience, this is the scenario for many young piano students. Some students like them, but some dread it. However, these students are forced to participate in them whether they want to or not. Forcing these students to participate in these contests, such as the Minnesota Music Teachers Association and contests similar, is damaging for them. Being forced in these contests takes all the enjoyment out of playing, …show more content…
Most parents know that young children and teens do not like being forced to do something they do not want to do. They fight back and rebel against the very parents that raised them. It is just a part of growing up. Instead, these students should have the opportunity of participating in them if they wish, but if they do not, then there is no pressure. Moreover, they are not allowed to choose their own music. Music is chosen for these students by their teachers. Most of the time, the music that is chosen for them are classical pieces, especially if they are teens. From experience, most young children and teens do not enjoy playing classical pieces. If the student was able to chose their own music, along with the teacher's approval, they would enjoy being in these contests a lot more. The real question here is what happened to just playing the piano for the sake of playing the piano? Why do these young students have to be judged? Most pianists play the piano because it is fun for them and they enjoy it. These contests can take all the joy from playing the piano for some. Sometimes so much so that they find ways to avoid practising at all …show more content…
These students have more things they could be doing instead of preparing for these contests, such as sports, friends, and schoolwork. Most of the participants are involved with something other than piano, such as another instrument, sports, and school activities. One of the great benefits of being a kid is not worrying about anything besides the time they are supposed to be home for dinner. Being a kid is very stress-free compared to being a teen and older. They do not have the time or the energy to be worried and stressed over one music contest. Moreover, these contests take months to prepare for, just for one song. If someone takes the contests out, a student has so much more time to work on other songs, than just one. A student could learn many more things and concentrate on more important things in his or her life than just one
It’s hard for children to understand this at a young age but it will help them down the road. Pageants play a huge role in developing self discipline. This is where parents come into play. By parents showing their children how to prepare and what it takes to win, children learn this crucial lesson. It
In “Losing is Good for You,” Ashley Merryman argues that society should stop handing out trophies for participation and instead let your child loose sometimes. Merryman states, “today, participation trophies and prizes are almost a given, as children are constantly assured that they are winners.” She later goes on and says that children who are given so much praise will crack “at the first experience of difficulty.” In her opinion, she does not believe that every child should be given a trophy because it will affect how they handle a different task. She claims that children would be better off losing than winning, and she also think that children should not get a trophy for everything they compete in.
I understand that kids need to have some type of recognition for at least participating in an activity rather than not being involved. Yet I do not believe that handing out participation trophies to
While many writers claim that participation trophies are beneficial, writer Ashley Merryman agrees with the idea that participation trophies are more destructive than beneficial regarding the learning process of a child. The general argument made by Merryman in her work, “Forget Trophies, Let Kids Know It’s O.K. to Lose,” is that providing
Participation trophies can lead to an increase in confidence within children, and they also give the child a reason to engage in the activity. The boost in confidence in a child is recommended throughout their young years since the child may feel as if it's not as smart or as talented as the other kids. The reason to engage is also a great thing because children can let out their pent up emotions from being in the classroom. So all in all, children winning participation trophies may actually be a good thing.
“What doesn’t kill you makes you stronger,” this phrase is a great representation of the problem that children of the world face due to participation trophies. Participation trophies kill the drive of young kids unless they are taught to accept them correctly. Children need to know that these awards should not be a goal.
Our society has shifted its beliefs in how we should treat competition in young people. The concept that "everyone receives a trophy" has taken the place of only rewarding those who achieve excellence within that activity. Rewarding all participants in youth activities and sports has become standard practice in American culture. "Should kids get a trophy for participation?" or should only the achievers receive a trophy? In the following essay it will explore the idea that everyone should win from participating and get an achievement for being there.
Persuasive writing: Why There Should Not Be Participation Trophies? “ Participation trophies send a dangerous message… We Are All Winners!” Said by -Betty Berden is completely true. We are telling the kids that it's ok to lose, and that you don't need to improve.
Finally, kids that are given participation trophies are given the wrong idea. Fifty-seven percent of people said "only winners" deserve to have participation trophies, giving out participation trophies is tantamount to giving kids the wrong praise, and giving kids with bad attitudes and not a care in the world is not a good idea. These kids need to realize that they need
Elementary students who participate in group sports often receive participation awards at the end of the sports season. James Harrison posted on twitter that he felt participation trophies were wrong, because the child did not actually achieve anything. This post has caused a major controversy across the United States. Some parents agree with Harrison and say that participation trophies create a false sense of achievement, which stops their child from trying hard later on. I, however, disagree. Participation awards help kids feel like they had a part in an activity, reward children from their effort, and can help them strive for success.
Participation trophies should not be handed out to teach children the purpose of working hard to achieve your
Participation trophies are a very bad thing. Participation trophies should not be given out to young kids that have no idea what they are. Little kids more than likely do not know what they are and some might think that they won even though they lost. With kids not knowing what they are makes them think that they did just as good as the kids that won. They need to know what they did wrong and what the can do to improve that and be like the kids that won. Some kids might grow up with everyone telling them that they did great and they have nothing to work on. They think they are better than those who won and even everyone in their life. Kids should grow up becoming better in things that they feel passionate about and not just giving up. Kids
This will teach the kids that they need to earn something for themselves and in order to do that they need to be willing to work and do whatever it takes to get there. This is how we will shape the youth of today by letting them know that they need to earn things and nothing is going to come easy therefore this is a no side argument. With not giving kids a trophy or some type of reward for participation they will be driven to want to strive and get an award but not just participation actually winning a game or some type of contest in life having an actual placing of ribbon or trophy. By saying no to giving trophies or rewards of participation you are letting the kids know that it is life and that in order to succeed they need to try very hard at what they want. The kids need to strive and work their hardest to get what they want and it is all taught through parents and the leaders of the youth event
I believe that students shouldn't get participation trophies because it makes them weak minded. It always makes children also want to get a trophy for everything that they do. Life isn't going to give you a participation trophy for doing the things that you're supposed to do. People get dependent on these rewards and won't be able to take constructive criticism.
Students do not have to play any musical instruments if they do not want to. You cannot force a student to play a musical instrument. Students should be able to decide whether they would want to play an instrument or not. School should not force children to play a musical instrument. Some kids have more important things to do on their free time or at home.