Working Environment Gatherings Are Turning Out

Creating Effective Teams: a Guide for Members and Leaders is a book by Wheelan (2013) designed to do as the title states; guiding members and leaders to create effective teams. Wheelan (2013) begins the book by highlighting the reasons that groups are important. Wheelan (2013) states that throughout history, “Groups have played a major role in both the survival of human beings and the development of human culture” (p. 1). The majority of the book is based on 4 stages that create a group of individuals into an effective team. The first stage is called dependency and inclusion. According to Wheelan (2013), the first stage of the group is

Developmental Sequence in Small Groups. The article focused on two realms of group development: interpersonal relationships and task activity. He hypothesized a four stage model in which each stage needed to be successfully navigated in order to reach effective group functioning” (Bonebright, 2010, p. 113).

Learning how to work effectively in a group situation is key to success in many professions as well as in social situations. Groups vary from each other based on the individuals that make up each group, all of us belong to various groups at one time or another. The roles that we fulfill vary from group to

The five stages of developing groups is an important part of the position. In many cases it is the relationships that a person will have with other individuals who will determine the best members to put into the different groups. As well, the different skill sets that individuals have are also an important part in placing group members together. The observation of the first groups placed together will be a good gauge in learning how some of the individuals work and observing how others work well together. The group size should be eight to 10 people to facilitate greater ease of equal participation among the individuals.

Being involved groups is essential to everyday living and many of us will belong to a variety of groups at the same time. For example, families, social, sports, support, learning management and committees groups. A group is “a small, face-to-face collection of persons who interact to accomplish some purpose” (Schriver, 1998). In other words, a group is collection of diverse people with common characteristics or purpose. A group can consist of any number of people from any number of races, ethnicities, culture, age, and or religious background. People involved in groups interact, engage, support, and identify with each other and are aware of each other in the group, often meet regularly at pre-determined destinations and times. The people involved

This paper is going to discuss relevant background factors, circumstances, and structures of small group interaction. First, I will explain how a person’s background can influence participation in a group and then we will look at how values can impact a group. I will also explain how I respond to situations where I am working with people who have different values. Next, I will explain the implications of falling into “team traps” and will use three of the ten for specific examples on why they should be avoided. Finally, I will summarize all that we have learned today on group interactions. Let’s start by looking at how peoples background can influence participation in a group.

Specifically, this paper will address the following topics: the definition of a group, the roles played within the group, a description of the group member personalities, the intended focus of the group, how the group worked together as a team and the process that was involved, how conflict was resolved, and how the group emerged as a group at the end of the situation.

Forming a team consists of interdependence, sharing responsibility (each group member is in charge of their own part), and working towards a common goal to achieve success. The stages of team formation are necessary for the team to grow together, to resolve problems, find solutions and to give results. Group development was established by psychologist Bruce Tuckman in 1965. He developed the stages of forming, storming, norming and performing. Adjourning is the fifth stage that was added ten years

Humans are social beings who organize themselves into groups that share a common interest and are essential for discovering, developing meaning, and self-worth. Groups are important for everyday work, and they work toward achieving a goal. Groups increase the information of one person by combining ideas and knowledge. They can also help people in their social life through interacting with other people and bypassing their comfort zone. Not much work can be done alone, whereas a group can help solve problems and assist each other in work. Our group shows example of docile, zealous, humble, and diligent whether it be in our group or each members and everyone contribute to keep the group working.

Compose teams this would fuse picking people who give the fundamental mix of learning, aptitudes, limits, and related inclusions that power accomplishment and the qualities, social capacities, and motivations that engage the gathering to work effectively together. Forming a group is not a simple undertaking, this activity limit includes picking a sidekick of individual’s will's character powerful in accomplishing the gathering task plot by the affiliation and after that ensuring that the mix of individuals is appropriate as time goes on as the gathering makes and builds up its condition. This gathering specialist work incorporates two key assignments. The essential undertaking incorporates altering the structure of the gathering to the errand

When working with more than two people things can get challenging even for the most skilled. Groups are filled with many people, which constitutes many different time schedules and personalities. Ashman’s explanation of field theory with groups can defend the statement that groups can be complex. Ashman says that for groups to succeed, positive actions must take place such as people in the group getting along (2008). On the other hand, if meeting times do not match up for everyone it can hinder the group. External forces can affect the group as well. When working with large groups, there are a variety of factors that can make group work more challenging.

Bruce W Tuckman is a respected educational psychologist who first described the four stages of group development in 1965. While looking at the behavior of small groups in a variety of environments, he recognized the distinct phases they go through. He also suggested that they need to experience all four stages before they achieve maximum effectiveness. He refined and developed the model in 1977 with the addition of a fifth stage. Since then, others have attempted to adapt and extend the model although sometimes with more of an eye on rhyme than reason (Chimera Consulting 2001).

Tuckman proposes that groups develop via five stages; forming, storming, norming, performing and finally adjourning (Archee, Gurney, & Mohan, 2013a). The first stage, known as forming, involves clarifying the task and purpose of the group, and identifying boundaries of both the task and interpersonal behaviour (Archee et al., 2013a). For the presentation task we were randomly allocated into groups. This worried me greatly as I have struggled in the past with group members who do not contribute equally or see the task as important as other group members. To avoid this problem, the group collectively determined and agreed upon a number of ground rules. For example, we decided that all group members were expected to contribute equally to the presentation, all group members were expected to attend and contribute at all group meetings, and all group members would adhere to agreed upon deadlines. Having failed to do this in previous group assignments, this clarification stage

The reason for groups is to join a gathering of individuals to cooperate to finish certain objectives that can't be accomplished adequately by a person. Albeit each colleague's

“Group work is a form of voluntary association of members benefiting from cooperative learning that enhances the total output of the activity than when done individually”.