Yates traveled state to state, carjacking people along the way, and eventually arrived back to Chicago where he began to look for his sister, Nellie Carr. During this time he started using the spyware on Lindsay’s phone to keep tabs on the investigation. Yates arrives at an apartment complex, finds the apartment his sister owns, and knocks on the door. Yates eventually charms his way into the apartment and brutally killed all of Nellie’s roommates who were nurses, searching for her. When he didn’t find her at her home, Yates went to her job where he asked a couple of students where she was and they informed him she was covering class and was headed to the parking lot. While he waits he called Lindsay spoofing her mom’s phone number and Lindsay ignores it. When Yates found Nellie, he kidnapped her and left another note taunting Lindsay and revealing he knew she was at the station. He starts interrogating Nellie about her past and keeps mentioning how everyone needs a home. …show more content…
Yates then breaks into Lindsay’s apartment, bringing Nellie with him and checks on Lindsay through the spyware and monitors when Lindsay opens the box. As soon Lindsay reads the note he calls her again spoofing her mom’s number and FaceTime’s her. Yates shows Lindsay that Nellie is still alive and continues taunting her. Lindsay tries to elicit a confession from Yates on the four nurses he killed, but Yates refuses and starts ranting about Cain and Abel and hangs up on her. Yates then locks Nellie in a closet and warns her that if she tries to escape he will kill
Jesse and Dexter talk. She tells him that the night before she heard Rita and Buck saying that he killed their bus driver. She gets scared and starts to cry. After hearing this, the boys decide that they need to leave. Back at Valley Gardens the parents are receiving the phone calls from Juan regarding the ransom. All the parents are discussing with their spouses the amount of the ransom are making plans to get the money except. But, Dexter’s uncle still hasn’t heard about the kidnapping yet. The parents are also faced with the question of whether or not to call the police. Back at the cabin, the kids finally decide that Marianne will distract Rita while Buck’s gone so Jesse can sneak and get the keys to the storage room to unlock the boys later. When Buck comes home, he and Rita go to sleep and the girls unlock the boys. The plan is to have Dexter hotwire the car with Glenn’s help, and for Bruce to transport messages between the boys and girls. Jesse and Marianne go back to the bunk beds and await the message from Bruce that they are ready when she hears Buck get out of bed and go into the kitchen. She tries to get Buck to go back to bed when the door comes open slowly and in walks Bruce. Bruce says quietly that they got the car hotwired, then he sees Buck. Jesse shouts ‘run’ and all three boys take off down the hill. The girls screamed when a pistol shot rang out throughout the forest. They saw a dark figure drop onto the ground. Once in
Jonathan Simons “Mass imprisonment on trial: A remarkable court decision and the future of prisons in American landmark”, focuses on the decision made from case Brown v. Plata, where it was discovered that the overcrowding of prisoners was causing prisoners to suffer from chronic illness and inhumane treatment. As per the 8th amendment prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment the court ordered the release of more prisoners than ever before. Mass incarceration resulted from laws like the three strikes laws or use a gun and you’re done created situations on inhumane treatment such as denial of healthcare which caused death behind bars this calls for reforms. In Massachusetts the three strike laws must be enforced with a different approach
In the 1930’s teenagers from across the country were leaving their homes to search for jobs due to the extreme poverty caused by the Great Depression. Whether it was blacks or whites, they were all affected one way or the other by the nation’s economical failure. It became popular for the young men and women to travel by freight trains to arrive to the places with better job opportunities. Around this time blacks were still not treated fairly, even in poverty. In the Scottsboro case in Alabama two white woman prostitutes falsely accused nine African American youths of rape on a freight train car; the boys were convicted in every trial due to the prejudices of an all white jury, and they had an attorney with little to no motivation to put any effort into their defense.
Ms. Roberts called the rape hotline and reported that she might be a victim of a sex offense, only because her friend Michelle told her about a conversation her cousin Matthew overheard taking place at the Bull Eyes Sport Pub. Michelle went on to inform Ms. Roberts that Matthew overhead an unknown individual talking about a sexual encounter between her and PO Ng. Ms. Roberts stated that she did enter bar and had two shots of whisky and doesn't remember any incident or sexual relation with anyone. Throughout this investigation Ms. Roberts made numerous inconsistent statements, and in several occasions refused to cooperate with investigators. In addition, video surveillance obtained, contradicts statements she made during her interview. Based
The famous novelist Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn once said “Justice is conscience, not a personal conscience but conscience of the whole humanity.” Justice is one of the most dominant themes in the book of Montana 1948 by Larry Watson. In the story, Wesley is a sheriff of Bentrock Montana, when his brother Frank is accused of taking advantage of his patients. He is forced to choose between justice and family loyalty. In the beginning of the novel, Wesley values family loyalty more than justice, but after he finds out what his brother has done. He decides that justice is more important.
Justice is something many people deserve, but it is not always what they get. Throughout the novel Montana 1948, by Larry Watson, follows a series of events that take place in the summer of 1948, and is seen through the eyes of a twelve-year-old boy. In the novel a adolescent boy named David witnesses his father, Wesley, choose between loyalty or justice. Due to charges made against Wesley’s brother Frank, Wesley had to confront Frank about the charges that were made against him. Unfortunately, David had to watch as all these problems and secrets unravel which eventually destroyed Frank. Justice was served to Frank although many people were against the idea of Frank receiving his punishment. In addition, justice is also served in the story
The miscarriages of justice represents the cases where the court has failed to exonerate the innocent. Due to this failure, many innocent lives have been taken away from their friends and families. It is the system’s job to prevent these miscarriages from happening, but our differences affect their decisions. It is unfair how people are held up to certain standards, where they are afraid to be themselves in public because of the ways authorities handle the situation where they are caught in their “wrongdoing”. There are various amounts of different cases in which the innocent are accused of crimes they did not commit or when the convict is caught in their act.
The main character, Charlie must navigate through it even while feeling motionless and scared. He tells his story to the reader from his perspective. The reader sees life from exactly the way he sees the events and understands those events through a teenage boy’s eyes. The crisis is introduced when the town outcast Jasper Jones asked Charlie, a bookish young nobody of a boy for help. The reader sees Charlie’s internal conflicts of wanting to go with Jasper, feeling terrified, excited yet so wanting to be accepted by him Charlie does in fact sneak out in the middle of the night with his new friend. Jasper takes Charlie to the scene of the crime where Jasper’s girlfriend is hanging from a tree. The manner that Silvey describes Charlie’s reaction to the hanged girls is true to human nature, “I’m screaming, but they are muffled screams. I can’t breathe in. I feel like I’m underwater. Deaf and drowning.” This description foreshadows the solution to hide the body and Jasper and Charlie throw Laura Wishart into the lake. Unknown to either is Laura Wishart’s sister, Eliza. She witnessed the suicide of her sister and wrote the word “sorry” on the stump of the tree before she leaves. Charlie and Jasper find this word, assume that the killer wrote it there, and immediately jump to the
John knew he could live with his wrongdoing for his children but then he heard that Glies Cory died by being crushed to death for refusing to go to trial. What really was the last straw was when he saw Rebecca Nurse being brought in and refusing to confess a crime she didn't commit. He then realizes again that honor is more important and proceeds to rip up his signed confession.
Scopes Trial The John Scopes trial took place during the year of 1925, in the state of Tennessee. John Scopes was a public school teacher who stood accused of teaching evolution to his students, which would be considered a violation of The Butler Act.. In the movie Scopes was arrested, but in real life he turned himself in and teamed up with the American Civil Liberties Union to defend his actions. The defense was led by Clarence Darrow.
The Cherokees provided the best example of Native Americans who understood their rights most clearly as they demonstrated in their plight objecting the Cherokee removal and as they exhibited in the construction of a constitution strikingly similar to the United States constitution as well as those of the states, carefully outlining their rights in an organized coherent manner. Consistent with the federal and state constitutions, the Cherokee constitution reflected a profound belief in republicanism, a representative form of government in which those eligible to vote elected individuals to make laws to protect their life, liberty, and property.
On June 20th 2001, Andrea Yates drowned her five children in the bathtub of her small suburban home in Clear Lake Texas. The subsequent trial and conviction caused a gargantuan amount of controversy. Jurors found Andrea guilty and sentenced her to life in prison despite the fact that there was an abundance of evidence to suggest that Andrea was legally insane at the time of the killings. In fact, 63% of the American public wanted her to receive the death penalty (). Although she was eventually acquitted by reason of insanity, both the judicial system and the American public should take a more mental-health-aware approach to the individuals they commit to prison.
The Scopes Trial is one of the best in American history because it symbolizes the conflict between science and theology, faith and reason, individual liberty, and majority rule. This trial was to decide not only the fate of an evolution-teacher, but also to decide if traditionalists or modernists would rule American culture. An object of intense publicity, the trial was seen as a clash between urban sophistication and rural fundamentalism.
Twelve Angry Men is a play that shows the workings of the American Justice System. The play is a celebration of the judicial system, and the main theme of the play is the triumph and the fragility of justice. The defendant’s fate is on the hand of the jurors as the man is accused of a serious offense which is murder. The purpose of the essay is to show the role that the plot, characters and the conflicts among the jurors support the theme of justice. Each juror had an initial verdict when the play begins but as events unfold and conflicts and agreements are reached the final and fair verdict is presented.
Communitarian critics of Rawls have argued that his A Theory of Justice provides an inadequate account of individuals in the original position. Michael Sandel, in Liberalism and the Limits of Justice argues that Rawls' conception of the person divorces any constitutive attachments that persons might have to their ends. Hence, Sandel asserts that Rawls privileges the standpoint of self-interested individuals at the expense of communal interests. I do not find Sandel's specific criticisms to be an accurate critique of what Rawls is doing in A Theory of Justice. However, this does not mean the more general thrust of the communitarian analysis of Rawls' conception of the person must be abandoned. By picking up the pieces