A, B, C and D are known robbers in their community. They created a Jewelry-on-hand Partnership so that the jewelries that they get from their crimes will be sold through this partnership. Is the partnership valid? No. The partnership is not valid because A, B, C, and D are labelled robbers in the community. Yes. The partnership is valid because the name is legitimate. No. The partnership is not valid because the jewelries came from illegal activities. Yes. The partnership is valid because there was consent among them.

A, B, C and D are known robbers in their community. They created a Jewelry-on-hand Partnership so that the jewelries that they get from their crimes will be sold through this partnership. Is the partnership valid? No. The partnership is not valid because A, B, C, and D are labelled robbers in the community. Yes. The partnership is valid because the name is legitimate. No. The partnership is not valid because the jewelries came from illegal activities. Yes. The partnership is valid because there was consent among them.

Principles of Accounting Volume 2

19th Edition

ISBN:9781947172609

Author:OpenStax

Publisher:OpenStax

Chapter1: Accounting As A Tool For Managers

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 4TP: Controversy tends to surround the topic of whistleblowers. For example, should they be considered...

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Farah and David decide to form a sports memorabilia retail partnership. They have known each other since business graduate school and have always worked well together on various projects. The business is doing well but cash flow is very tight. Farah takes several calls from vendors asking for payment. He believed David had been paying the bills. When he asks about this, David admits to embezzling from the partnership. What liability does Farah face as a result of the theft? Are you for or against a partnership? Please explain.
Alice owns a contracting company that receives most of its business through government contracts. A new procurement officer with a government agency implies to Alice that if she does not send him a bribe for her latest awarded contract, she will not get any further contracts. If Alice loses future contracts, her business will fail. She reluctantly gives the officer a bribe. Has Alice committed a violation? A. Yes, because Alice was not under economic duress. B. Yes, because being extorted is not a defense to giving a bribe. C. No, because Alice was under economic duress. D. No, because Alice was not the one who proposed the bribe.
During the interview of a suspect in an embezzlement case, several common themes are developed that make the offense seem morally acceptable to the suspect. Which of the following is NOT commonly used with embezzlers and other fraud offenders? A. “Borrowing” versus “stealing” B. “Did it for the family” C. “Not being paid enough” D. “Protesting an unjust law”
Usama, Shahid and Hassan are partners in a partnership firm. With an agreement among them, they decided that no partner will have the authority to buy or sell goods above Rs. 20,000 without other partners’ consent. Unaware of this provision (restriction), Ali sold goods worth Rs. 45,000 to Shahid who did not inform (or consult with) other partners. According to Partnership Act, explain whether the partnership firm and its partners are liable to Ali under the circumstances mentioned above.
Amy and Lester are partners in operating a store. Without consulting Amy, Lester enters into a contract to purchase $10,000 of merchandise for the store. Amy says she did not authorize the order and that she could have purchased the same merchandise for $7,000. Amy refuses to pay for the order. The vendor sues the partners. a. Must the partnership pay for the merchandise? If yes, how much? b. Assuming the partnership is a general partnership, can Amy’s personal assets be taken to pay for the merchandise?
Gladys is in charge of receiving all customer payments, recording the payments, and depositing them at the bank. What element of the fraud triangle is best described here? Group of answer choices Opportunity Rationalization Incentive/Pressure Attribution Gladys has large amounts of student loan debt and a crippling gambling habit. She works part-time job in another city. What element of the fraud triangle is best described here? Group of answer choices Opportunity Fraudy fraud Pressure/incentive Rationalization
During an internal investigation, Black, a Certified Fraud Examiner, interviewed Green, a fraud suspect. Although Green wanted to leave in the middle of the interview, Black blocked the exit and prevented him from leaving. Green subsequently confessed to committing fraud. If, under these facts, Green files a lawsuit for false imprisonment against Black, Black will likely: A. Win the case because the qualified business privilege protects investigators conducting internal investigations. B. Win the case because Green confessed to the fraud. C. Lose the case if a trier of fact concludes that he restrained Green without consent or legal justification. D. Lose the cans because Green did not leave the interview.
Government contracts account for the majority of Alice's business, which she owns as a contracting firm. A new procurement official with a government organisation makes an implied threat to Alice that she won't receive any further contracts if she doesn't offer him a bribe for her most recent deal. Alice's company will shut down if she loses further customers. She bribes the police reluctanly. Has Alice broken any rules? A. Alice was not under financial pressure, thus the answer is yes. B. Insofar as being the victim of extortion does not excuse paying a bribe. C. No, since Alice was struggling financially. D. No, because the bribe wasn't suggested by Alice.
Xavier, who is a partner in SYZ Floral Delivery, negligently drove the delivery truck off the road , seriously injuring Peter. Against whom can Peter possibly collect for his injuries? Group of answer choices A. Xavier, since he committed the negligent act. B. SYZ partnership, as a business entity. C. Any partner, from that partner's personal assets. D. All of the above.
Martin Manera is one of three partners who own and operate TaftWorld, a global import and export business. Martin is the partner in charge of recording partnership transactions in the accounts. One day while driving to work, Martin’s car broke down. Upon inspection, the mechanic discovered the engine had to be replaced at a cost of $5,000. Martin does not have enough money in his bank account and his credit cards are at their limits. He has to have this car to come to work, and he only uses his car for this purpose. He decides to take $5,000 from the partnership for the repair and record it as an expense of the partnership. What are three ethical issues in this scenario?
Neil and Dylan are partners in a lawn mower repair business in Ohio. While Neil is on vacation visiting his sister in Georgia, his sister's neighbor has trouble with her mower and Neil fixes it for her. She insists on paying him . Neil : O a. may keep the money as this partnership is NOT a professional business pursuant to the non - professional exception rule. O b. may not accept the money because it would create a conflict of interest. O c. may keep the payment since he did the work while he was on vacation. O d. may not accept the money because it would mean he was taking a business opportunity away from the partnership. O e. must turn the money over to the partnership because he earned it doing the kind of work that the partnership does.
Marco Brolo is one of three partners who own and operate Silkroad Partners, a global import–export business. Marco is the partner in charge of recording partnership transactions in the accounts. On his way to work one day, Marco's car broke down. At the repair shop, Marco learned that his car's engine had significant damage, and it will cost over $2,000 to repair the damage. He does not have enough money in his bank account to cover the cost of the repair, and his credit cards are at their limit. This car is the only form of transportation that Marco has to get to and from work every day. He does not use his car for any business travel. After considering his options, Marco decides to take $2,000 from the partnership for the repair, and record it as an expense of the partnership. He believes that this is appropriate since he needs his car to get to work every day. Is Marco behaving ethically? Why? Who is affected by Marco's decision? What other alternatives might Marco…