A driver in Massachusetts was sent to traffic court for speeding. The evidence against the driver was that the policewoman observed the driver's car alongside a second car at a certain moment, and the policewoman had already clocked the second car as going faster than the speed limit. the driver argued,"" The second car was passing me. I was not speeding." the judge ruled against the driver because, in the judge's words, "If two cars were side by side, you were both speeding". If you were the lawyer representing the accused driver, how would you argue this case? Explain in 10 sentences

A driver in Massachusetts was sent to traffic court for speeding. The evidence against the driver was that the policewoman observed the driver's car alongside a second car at a certain moment, and the policewoman had already clocked the second car as going faster than the speed limit. the driver argued,"" The second car was passing me. I was not speeding." the judge ruled against the driver because, in the judge's words, "If two cars were side by side, you were both speeding". If you were the lawyer representing the accused driver, how would you argue this case? Explain in 10 sentences