French 4 Unite 0 Le.Q Vocab 1Vocab 2 E Vocab 3SCOTUS Comparison FRQ: NYT Co. v. US (1971) and Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeler (1988)Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier (1988)The Spectrum, the school-sponsored newspaper of Hazelwood East High School, was written and edited bystudents. In May 1983, Robert E. Reynolds, the school principal, received the pages proofs for the May 13 issue.Reynolds found two of the articles in the issue to be inappropriate, and ordered that the pages on which thearticles appeared be withheld from publication. Cathy Kuhlmeier and two other former Hazelwood Eaststudents brought the case to court.In a 5-to-3 decision, the Court held that the ... did not require schools to affirmatively promote particular typesof student speech. The Court held that schools must be able to set high standards for student speechdisseminated under their auspices, and that schools retained the right to refuse to sponsor speech that was"inconsistent with 'the shared values of a civilized social order." Educators did not offend the .. by exercisingeditorial control over the content of student speech so long as their actions were "reasonably related tolegitimate pedagogical concerns." The actions of principal Reynolds, the Court held, met this test.After reading the scenario, please respond to A, B, and C below:A. Identify the specific constitutional clause that is common in both the NYT Co v. US (1971) and theHazelwood v. Kuhlmeier (1988) cases.B. Based on the constitutional clause identified in part A, explain why the facts of the NYT Co v. US (1971) ledto a different holding than the holding in the Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier (1988).C. Explain an action that the Congress could take if they disagreed with the holding in Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier(1988) to affect its impact.DELL

A: The constitutional clause that protects the " Freedom of speech and expression and free press"…

A. Identify the specific constitutional clause that is common in both the NYT Co v. US (1971) and the Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier (1988) cases. B. Based on the constitutional clause identified in part A, explain why the facts of the NYT Co v. US (1971) led to a different holding than the holding in the Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier (1988). C. Explain an action that the Congress could take if they disagreed with the holding in Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier (1988) to affect its impact.

A. Identify the specific constitutional clause that is common in both the NYT Co v. US (1971) and the Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier (1988) cases. B. Based on the constitutional clause identified in part A, explain why the facts of the NYT Co v. US (1971) led to a different holding than the holding in the Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier (1988). C. Explain an action that the Congress could take if they disagreed with the holding in Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier (1988) to affect its impact.