An offer can be defined as an intimation of words and conduct, with a desire to enter into a binding arrangement. It is argued for an offer to be effective, the terms of the offer must be clear, precise and unambiguous. Provide one example/scenario each of the case laws below; a. Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Company (1893) b. Gibson v. Manchester City Council (1979) c. Harvey v. Facey (1893) d. Hyde v. Wrench (1840) e. Boots Cash Chemists (Southern) Ltd. v. Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain (1953)
An offer can be defined as an intimation of words and conduct, with a desire to enter into a binding arrangement. It is argued for an offer to be effective, the terms of the offer must be clear, precise and unambiguous. Provide one example/scenario each of the case laws below; a. Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Company (1893) b. Gibson v. Manchester City Council (1979) c. Harvey v. Facey (1893) d. Hyde v. Wrench (1840) e. Boots Cash Chemists (Southern) Ltd. v. Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain (1953)
Related questions
Question
An offer can be defined as an intimation of words and conduct, with a desire to enter into a binding arrangement. It is argued for an offer to be effective, the terms of the offer must be clear, precise and unambiguous.
Provide one example/scenario each of the case laws below;
a. Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Company (1893)
b. Gibson v. Manchester City Council (1979)
c. Harvey v. Facey (1893)
d. Hyde v. Wrench (1840)
e. Boots Cash Chemists (Southern) Ltd. v. Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain (1953)
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step by step
Solved in 3 steps
