An operation is considered to have been successfully stopped when the central processing unit (CPU) accepts the interruption and proceeds on to the next job. If the process is already underway, then why is it impossible to halt it? Since the execution and cleaning can wait till we've resolved the problem, there's no reason not to take care of them right now.

An operation is considered to have been successfully stopped when the central processing unit (CPU) accepts the interruption and proceeds on to the next job. If the process is already underway, then why is it impossible to halt it? Since the execution and cleaning can wait till we've resolved the problem, there's no reason not to take care of them right now.

Systems Architecture

7th Edition

ISBN:9781305080195

Author:Stephen D. Burd

Publisher:Stephen D. Burd

Chapter4: Processor Technology And Architecture

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 2PE: If a microprocessor has a cycle time of 0.5 nanoseconds, what’s the processor clock rate? If the...

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

If a microprocessor has a cycle time of 0.5 nanoseconds, what’s the processor clock rate? If the fetch cycle is 40% of the processor cycle time, what memory access speed is required to implement load operations with zero wait states and load operations with two wait states?
When it comes to process execution, what is the advantage of first allocating it to the I/O queue and then pushing it to the CPU when it is ready? What, in your opinion, will happen if the I/O is not completed correctly? Is the CPU burst going to be affected? What do you mean?
A processor can decode encrypted data and system instructions in a number of different ways, and it can also execute instructions based on data that has been decoded and system instructions that have already been performed in a number of different ways. The rebuttals that have been sent in will be encrypted before the processor reads them. Is there any benefit to use a CPU in such a manner if at all possible? What are the system requirements, and how do they compare to the system's performance and efficiency?
What is the benefit of assigning process execution to the I/O queue first and then pushing it to the CPU when it's ready? What do you think will happen if the I/O is interrupted? Will the CPU burst be affected? How so?
Find the ratio of CPU utilization for a system spend 120 minutes to execute the processes and the total latency (Context switch time) time is 20 minutes.
As a consequence, the CPU suspends all active processes until the interruption is resolved. This is known as interrupting service. Who knows why the present procedure has been stopped? It is not possible to continue with the present operation and then deal with the disruption after it has concluded.
On the other hand, a processor capable of decoding encrypted data and system instructions and then executing the instructions on the decoded data and system instructions has been proposed for implementation. The submitted suits will be encrypted by the CPU. Using a processor of this level has what advantages? What are the requirements for a processor of this type?
What is the CPU usage if 5 processes are operating at the same time and the CPU spends 30% of its time waiting for I/O completion?
It is possible to build a system in which shared structures are stored in the local memory of each process and accessible via interprocess communication. This kind of system has been shown to be practical. What are some of the problems with the overall design?
How can we prevent a computer's central processing unit from squandering time by attempting to execute too many instructions simultaneously? How does the lack of certain resources affect the viability of this strategy's implementation? Give me a taste of what you may expect from them in this area, and I'll know whether or not to hire them.