Auditors make materiality judgments during the planning phase of the audit in order to be sure they ultimately gather sufficient evidence during the audit to provide reasonable assurance that the financial statements are free of material misstatements. The lower the materiality threshold that an auditor has for an account balance, the more the evidence that the auditor must collect. Auditors often use quantitative benchmarks such as 1% of total assets or 5% of net income to determine whether misstatements materially affect the financial statements, but ultimately it is an auditor’s individual professional judgment as to whether a given misstatement is or is not considered material. What is the relationship between the level of riskiness of the client and the level of misstatement in an account balance that an auditor would consider material? For example, assume that Client A has weaker controls over accounts receivable compared to Client B (therefore, Client A is riskier than Client B). Assume that Client B is similar in size to Client A and that the auditor has concluded that a misstatement exceeding $5,000 would be material for Client B’s accounts receivable account. Should the materiality threshold for Client A be the same as, more than, or less than that for Client B? Further, which client will require more audit evidence to be collected, Client A or Client B? How might an auditor’s individual characteristics affect his or her professional judgments about materiality? Assume that one auditor is more professionally skeptical than another auditor, and that they are making the materiality judgment in part (a) of this problem. Compare the possible alternative monetary thresholds that a more versus less skeptical auditor might make for Client A.

Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach to Conducting a Quality Audit
10th Edition
ISBN:9781305080577
Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. Rittenberg
Publisher:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. Rittenberg
Chapter7: Planning The Audit: Identifying, And Responding To The Risk Of Material Misstatement
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 34RSCQ
icon
Related questions
Question

Auditors make materiality judgments during the planning phase of the audit in order to be sure they ultimately gather sufficient evidence during the audit to provide reasonable assurance that the financial statements are free of material misstatements. The lower the materiality threshold that an auditor has for an account balance, the more the evidence that the auditor must collect. Auditors often use quantitative benchmarks such as 1% of total assets or 5% of net income to determine whether misstatements materially affect the financial statements, but ultimately it is an auditor’s individual professional judgment as to whether a given misstatement is or is not considered material.

  1. What is the relationship between the level of riskiness of the client and the level of misstatement in an account balance that an auditor would consider material? For example, assume that Client A has weaker controls over accounts receivable compared to Client B (therefore, Client A is riskier than Client B). Assume that Client B is similar in size to Client A and that the auditor has concluded that a misstatement exceeding $5,000 would be material for Client B’s accounts receivable account. Should the materiality threshold for Client A be the same as, more than, or less than that for Client B? Further, which client will require more audit evidence to be collected, Client A or Client B?
  2. How might an auditor’s individual characteristics affect his or her professional judgments about materiality?
  3. Assume that one auditor is more professionally skeptical than another auditor, and that they are making the materiality judgment in part (a) of this problem. Compare the possible alternative monetary thresholds that a more versus less skeptical auditor might make for Client A.

Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps with 3 images

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Audit procedures for items of Financial Statement
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, accounting and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Recommended textbooks for you
Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach to Conducting a Q…
Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach to Conducting a Q…
Accounting
ISBN:
9781305080577
Author:
Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. Rittenberg
Publisher:
South-Western College Pub
Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach (MindTap Course L…
Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach (MindTap Course L…
Accounting
ISBN:
9781337619455
Author:
Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. Rittenberg
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Contemporary Auditing
Contemporary Auditing
Accounting
ISBN:
9781337650380
Author:
KNAPP
Publisher:
Cengage