(b) Explain how Proposition 3 can be used to show that the multiplicative group Z is not cyclic.

Algebra & Trigonometry with Analytic Geometry
13th Edition
ISBN:9781133382119
Author:Swokowski
Publisher:Swokowski
Chapter10: Sequences, Series, And Probability
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 63RE
icon
Related questions
Question
please send solution for part b only handwritten solution accepted
Problem 2. Read the following mathematical text and answer the associated comprehension
questions at the end.
The goal of this text is to prove the following theorem:
Theorem 1. Forn> 3, the multiplicative group Z. is not cyclic.
We start by proving several intermediate results:
Proposition 2. For m 1, the additive group Z contains at most one element
of order 2.
Proof. The proposition is true if m is odd. Indeed, a group of odd order does
not contain any element of order 2 by Lagrange's Theorem. Thus, it is enough to
consider the case where the order of Zm is of the form m = 20 for some integer
e>1.
Let ā e Zu be an element of order 2 with a an integer such that 0 < a < 2l – 1.
We thus have a +ā = 0 in Z2e, i.e. 2a is divisible by 20. This implies that a is
divisible by l. Since 0 < a < 2l-1, it follows that we either have a 0 or a = l.
Thus, we either have a =
0, which is the identity element and has order 1, or
a = 1, which is an element of order 2. Thus, the only element of order 2 of Zu
is 7.
Proposition 3. Let G be a finite cyclic group. Then G contains at most one
element of order 2.
Proof. Let m be the order of G. We know from the course that a cyclic group
of order m is isomorphic to the additive group Zm, so let us consider a group
isomorphism f : G → Zm. If G does not contain any element of order 2, there
is nothing further to do, so let us assume that G contains an element r of order
2. We have a2 = e in G. We thus have f(a2) = f(e) in Zm, and by properties of
group homomorphisms, this implies that
f(r) + f(x) = 0.
%3D
Thus, f(x) is an element of Z, of order at most 2. However, since r is non-trivial,
f(r) cannot have order 1. Thus, it has order exactly 2. By Proposition 2, it thus
follows that f(x) is the unique element of Zm of order 2.
Let y E G be another element of order 2 of G. The same reasoning shows that
f(y) is also the unique element of order 2 of Zm. Thus, f(r) = f(y), and by
injectivity of f, it follows that r = y. Thus, G contains exactly one element of
order 2.
Transcribed Image Text:Problem 2. Read the following mathematical text and answer the associated comprehension questions at the end. The goal of this text is to prove the following theorem: Theorem 1. Forn> 3, the multiplicative group Z. is not cyclic. We start by proving several intermediate results: Proposition 2. For m 1, the additive group Z contains at most one element of order 2. Proof. The proposition is true if m is odd. Indeed, a group of odd order does not contain any element of order 2 by Lagrange's Theorem. Thus, it is enough to consider the case where the order of Zm is of the form m = 20 for some integer e>1. Let ā e Zu be an element of order 2 with a an integer such that 0 < a < 2l – 1. We thus have a +ā = 0 in Z2e, i.e. 2a is divisible by 20. This implies that a is divisible by l. Since 0 < a < 2l-1, it follows that we either have a 0 or a = l. Thus, we either have a = 0, which is the identity element and has order 1, or a = 1, which is an element of order 2. Thus, the only element of order 2 of Zu is 7. Proposition 3. Let G be a finite cyclic group. Then G contains at most one element of order 2. Proof. Let m be the order of G. We know from the course that a cyclic group of order m is isomorphic to the additive group Zm, so let us consider a group isomorphism f : G → Zm. If G does not contain any element of order 2, there is nothing further to do, so let us assume that G contains an element r of order 2. We have a2 = e in G. We thus have f(a2) = f(e) in Zm, and by properties of group homomorphisms, this implies that f(r) + f(x) = 0. %3D Thus, f(x) is an element of Z, of order at most 2. However, since r is non-trivial, f(r) cannot have order 1. Thus, it has order exactly 2. By Proposition 2, it thus follows that f(x) is the unique element of Zm of order 2. Let y E G be another element of order 2 of G. The same reasoning shows that f(y) is also the unique element of order 2 of Zm. Thus, f(r) = f(y), and by injectivity of f, it follows that r = y. Thus, G contains exactly one element of order 2.
We are now ready to prove Theorem 1:
Proof of Theorem 1. We know that an element k E Zyn belongs to Z, if and only
if k and 2" are coprime, that is, if and only ifk is odd. In particular, the elements
a := 2"-1 -1 and b:= 2n-1 +1
belong to Z, and we have
a² = (2"-I - T)² :
2n x2n-2
+ T = T,
%3D
2n
and
(2"-1+1)2:
2" x2n-2
+ ī =T.
2n
Thus, Z contains at least two distinct elements of order 2. Since cyclic groups
contain at most one element of order 2 by Proposition 2, this implies that Z is
not cyclic.
Comprehension questions:
(a) Following the same approach as in the proof of Proposition 2, show that
for an integer m > 1, the additive group Zm either contains no element of
order 3 or contains exactly two elements of order 3.
(b) Explain how Proposition 3 can be used to show that the multiplicative
group Z is not cyclic.
(c) In the proof of Proposition 3, the following statement is not justified:
"However, since a is non-trivial, f(x) cannot have order 1."
Properly justify this statement.
(d) Show that Theorem 1 does not hold for = 1 and n 2. That is, show that
the multiplicative groups Z and Z are cyclic.
(e) The proof of Theorem 1 is thus currently incomplete, as it does not explicitly
use the hypothesis that n > 3. In what parts of the proof is that assumption
implicitly used?
Transcribed Image Text:We are now ready to prove Theorem 1: Proof of Theorem 1. We know that an element k E Zyn belongs to Z, if and only if k and 2" are coprime, that is, if and only ifk is odd. In particular, the elements a := 2"-1 -1 and b:= 2n-1 +1 belong to Z, and we have a² = (2"-I - T)² : 2n x2n-2 + T = T, %3D 2n and (2"-1+1)2: 2" x2n-2 + ī =T. 2n Thus, Z contains at least two distinct elements of order 2. Since cyclic groups contain at most one element of order 2 by Proposition 2, this implies that Z is not cyclic. Comprehension questions: (a) Following the same approach as in the proof of Proposition 2, show that for an integer m > 1, the additive group Zm either contains no element of order 3 or contains exactly two elements of order 3. (b) Explain how Proposition 3 can be used to show that the multiplicative group Z is not cyclic. (c) In the proof of Proposition 3, the following statement is not justified: "However, since a is non-trivial, f(x) cannot have order 1." Properly justify this statement. (d) Show that Theorem 1 does not hold for = 1 and n 2. That is, show that the multiplicative groups Z and Z are cyclic. (e) The proof of Theorem 1 is thus currently incomplete, as it does not explicitly use the hypothesis that n > 3. In what parts of the proof is that assumption implicitly used?
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 5 steps

Blurred answer
Recommended textbooks for you
Algebra & Trigonometry with Analytic Geometry
Algebra & Trigonometry with Analytic Geometry
Algebra
ISBN:
9781133382119
Author:
Swokowski
Publisher:
Cengage
Linear Algebra: A Modern Introduction
Linear Algebra: A Modern Introduction
Algebra
ISBN:
9781285463247
Author:
David Poole
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elements Of Modern Algebra
Elements Of Modern Algebra
Algebra
ISBN:
9781285463230
Author:
Gilbert, Linda, Jimmie
Publisher:
Cengage Learning,
College Algebra
College Algebra
Algebra
ISBN:
9781938168383
Author:
Jay Abramson
Publisher:
OpenStax
Elementary Linear Algebra (MindTap Course List)
Elementary Linear Algebra (MindTap Course List)
Algebra
ISBN:
9781305658004
Author:
Ron Larson
Publisher:
Cengage Learning