Child Support Payment from Kevin Hamblin $12,000 Alimony Payment from Kevin Hamblin $16,000 Gift from her father to help with legal bills $8,500 Interest income on U.S. Treasury Bond $400 Interest income of Madison City Bond (municipal bond) $250 Interest income from First Bank of Madison $165 Life insurance proceeds on the death of her mother $45,000

Child Support Payment from Kevin Hamblin $12,000 Alimony Payment from Kevin Hamblin $16,000 Gift from her father to help with legal bills $8,500 Interest income on U.S. Treasury Bond $400 Interest income of Madison City Bond (municipal bond) $250 Interest income from First Bank of Madison $165 Life insurance proceeds on the death of her mother $45,000

CONCEPTS IN FED.TAX.,2020-W/ACCESS

20th Edition

ISBN:9780357110362

Author:Murphy

Publisher:Murphy

Chapter4: Income Exclusions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 67IIP

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

On June 30, 2019, Kelly sold property for 240,000 cash and a 960,000 note due on September 30, 2020. The note will also pay 6% interest, which is slightly higher than the Federal rate. Kellys cost of the property was 400,000. She is concerned that Congress may increase the tax rate that will apply when the note is collected. Kellys after-tax rate of return on investments is 6%. a. What can Kelly do to avoid the expected higher tax rate? b. Assuming that Kellys marginal combined Federal and state tax rate is 25% in 2019, how much would the tax rates need to increase to make the option identified in part (a) advisable?
Marlene, a cash basis taxpayer, invests in Series EE U.S. government savings bonds and bank certificates of deposit (CDs). Determine the tax consequences of the following on her 2019 gross income: a. On September 30, 2019, she cashed in Series EE bonds for 10,000. She purchased the bonds in 2009 for 7,090. The yield to maturity on the bonds was 3.5%. b. On July 1, 2018, she purchased a CD for 10,000. The CD matures on June 30, 2020, and will pay 10,816, thus yielding a 4% annual return. c. On July 1, 2019, she purchased a CD for 10,000. The maturity date on the CD was June 30, 2020, when Marlene would receive 10,300.
LO.2 Osprey Corporation, an accrual basis taxpayer, had taxable income for 2019 and paid 40,000 on its estimated state income tax for the year. During 2019, the company received a 4,000 refund upon filing its 2018 state income tax return. The company filed its 2019 state income tax return in August 2020 and paid the 7,000 state income tax due for 2019. In December 2019, the company received a notice from the state tax commission that an additional 6,000 of income tax was due for 2017 because of an error on the return. The company acknowledged the error in December 2019 and paid the additional 6,000 in tax in February 2020. What is Ospreys 2019 Federal income tax deduction for state income taxes?
LO.3, 4, 5 Using the legend provided below, classify each statement under 2019 tax law. a. A foreign tax credit is available. b. The deduction of charitable contributions is subject to percentage limitation(s). c. Excess charitable contributions can be carried forward for five years. d. On the contribution of inventory to charity, the full amount of any appreciation can be claimed as a deduction. e. Excess capital losses can be carried forward indefinitely. f. Excess capital losses cannot be carried back. g. A net short-term capital gain is subject to the same tax rate as ordinary income. h. The deduction for qualified business income may be available. i. A dividends received deduction is available. j. The like-kind exchange provisions of 1031 are available. k. A taxpayer with a fiscal year of May 1April 30 has a due date for filing a Federal income tax return of July 15. l. Estimated Federal income tax payments may be required.
LO.6, 8 William, a high school teacher, earns about 50,000 each year. In December 2019, he won 1,000,000 in the state lottery. William plans to donate 100,000 to his church. He has asked you, his tax adviser, whether he should donate the 100,000 in 2019 or 2020. Identify the tax issues related to Williams decision.