Consider the following resolution proof:1. Р(x)P2. ду, а) V -р(а) Р3. ¬q(a, a)4. ду, а)5. qа, а)6.Is this proof correct?

Answered: Consider the following resolution…

Consider the following resolution proof: 1. р(x) P 2. q(y, a) V ¬p(a) 3. q(а, а) P 4. ду, а) 5. да, а) 6. Is this proof correct?

Database System Concepts

7th Edition

ISBN:9780078022159

Author:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Publisher:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Chapter1: Introduction

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1PE

See similar textbooks

Related questions

Q: Complete this formal proof of -Ex-P(x). As always: use all conventions from FOL, BOOL and PROP. •…

A: Answer: our instruction is answer the first three part from the first part and . I have given…

Q: Prove that it is logically equal using common equivalent proposition. 1. ¬[p v (¬p ˄ q) ≡ (¬p ˄ ¬q)…

A: The equivalence is also called equivalence of propositions.

Q: 6. Prove or disprove that the two propositions in each pair are equivalent. a) (p → (9 → r)) ((p→ q)…

Q: 3.) Determine is each of the following is a tautology , a contradiction, or just satisfiable a. p Vq…

A: Tautology :- If in a truth table all the values in table is True means contains only T (Truth) in…

Q: 1 Compute probability of current state 2 compute the probability of observation sequence 3 Improve…

A: The answer is

Q: Find a denial (or the negation) for "(3!x)P(x)".

A: Find a denial (or the negation) for ” (!)P(x)". We first look at the negation of a statement…

Q: Show that ¬ (q ∨ (¬ q ∧ p)) and ¬q ∧ ¬p is logically equivalent.

Q: Prove or disprove that the two propositions in each pair are equivalent. (p (q r)) , ((p q ) ( p r…

Q: Question 1: Prove the equivalence of the following in three difterent ways (truth table,…

Q: If you exclude all the lines that are premises, how many lines does the shortest proof of the…

Q: Suppose you are presented with a large integer N and are asked to find its complete factorisation.…

A: In this question we have to write a code on Pollard Rho method. The required code (well commented),…

Q: (b) Use Spin to prove that the algorithm is still correct: use an assertion to prove mutual…

A: The mutual exclusion problem is the problem of restricting the access to the critical section in the…

Q: Examine the following natural deduction proof carefully. What does it show about the sentence (Q ∧ ¬…

A: Let's assume (P ⇔ Q) is a new statement "S". Then our sentence reduces to "( S ^ (~S) )". We know…

Q: Transform the following sentences to CNF.

A: Transform the given sentences to CNF

Q: Prove by logical equivalences and rules of inference that vx(L(x)→ R(x)),3x(P(x)^ ~ R(x))H ~ Vx(P(x)…

A: The instruments for proving logical equivalence are inference rules. The building of a truth table…

Q: (3) Use truth tables to determine whether the following set of sentences is consistent. { (K ·…

A: Given: use truth tables to determine whether the following set of sentences is consistent.

Q: 4. Justify your answer p( a, b ). p( c, b ). p( X. Z) -- p( X, Y ), p( Y, Z). p( X, Y) -- p( Y, X ).…

Q: 2.Construct truth table and identify if it’s tautology, contradiction, or contingency. (a) ((p → r)…

A: (p→r) means if p, then r. It is false when p is true and r is false. (r→q) means if r, then q.…

Q: comprises of an upstanding board with n lines and m sections of cells, some vacant and some loaded…

A: Here have to determine about puzzle comprises problem statement.

Q: 5. Prove valid 1. (y) (Ay v Ry) / (Ex) Rx 2. (x) (Nx v Cx) 2. (x) (~Cx v ~Ax) 4. (Ew) (~Nw v Rw)

A: fullscreen

Q: 2. Using the method of full or partial truth tables, say whether the following sentences of L1 are…

A: Truth table value.

Q: If L=xyzy where x,y,z e (0,1)*, then L is CFL or regular? Explain with proper justification.

A: Given language is, L=xyzy where x,y,z belongs to (0,1)*. A language is said to be Context free if…

Q: simplify the given proposition using the rules of logical equivalences. do not forget to indicate…

A: Rules used for simplification: 1) p∧(q ∨ r) = (p∧q)∨(p∧r) 2) p⇔ q = (p∧q)∨(~p∧~q) 3) p→q = ~p∨q 4)…

Q: Computer Science P(A)=0,6 P(B)=0,4 P(C)=0,3 P(D)=0,2 P(E)=0.1 P(A|D,E)=? find the solution using…

A: Given Data : P(A) = 0 , 6 P(B) = 0 , 4 P(C) = 0 , 3 P(D) = 0 , 2 P(E) = 0.1

Q: If you exclude all the lines that are premises, how many lines does the shortest proof of the…

A: A -> (B ^ C) ≡~A V (B ^ C) ---------Conditional Law ≡(~A V B) ^ (~A V C) -----------Distributive…

Q: w Absorption Law Identity Law Distributive Law c.) Absorption Law

A: given - Which of the following sequences of logical equivalences is valid that would lead to your…

Q: 7. Using the laws of logical equivalence, determine if the following state- ments are a tautology,…

A: 7. a. The solution for the first statement is :

Q: We know that A1,A2,..,An EA if and only if A is true in all worlds where each of A1, A2, .., An are…

A: Let's see the solution in the next steps

Q: 6. Prove or disprove that the two propositions in each pair are equivalent. a) (p→ (q → r)),…

A: Task : Given the expression. The task is to check if these expression are equal or not.

Q: This question is concerned with predicate logic in Lean Is the following proposition a tautology?…

A: This question is concerned with predicate logic in Lean Is the following proposition a tautology?(∀…

Q: Recall that the biconditional p↔q stands for(p→q)∧(q→p). Construct a truth table to verify that…

Q: 2. Construct a truth table for each of these compound propositions. a) [¬p∧(p∨q)]→q b)…

A: Truth table for: a) [¬p∧(p∨q)]→q p q ((¬p ∧ (p ∨ q)) → q) F F T F T T T F T T T T

Q: Assume that ∀x∃yP(x,y) is true and that the universe id true for x and y is non empty. Which of the…

A: ∀x∃yP(x,y) means the statement holds true for all values of x and one particular value of y.

Q: Which of the following logic statements best represents the Rule of Detachment?

A: If p → q is true and p is true, then q is true.

Q: Using semantic tableaux, prove the following propositional formula is valid. + ((p^q) →r) → ((pr) V…

A: Answer..

Q: Show that (? → ?) ∨ (? → ?) and ? → (? ∨ ?) are logically equivalent using a sequence of…

A: Given expressions are, (? → ?) ∨ (? → ?) and ? → (? ∨ ?) Consider the variables A, B and C. Then the…

Q: proof, Lemma double_modus_ponens : forall P Q R S : Prop, (P->Q) -> (R->S) -> (P /\ R) -> (Q /\ S).…

A: (P->Q) -> (R->S) -> (P /\ R) -> (Q /\ S) P->Q=¬P∨Q R->S= ¬R∨S (P /\ R) =…

Q: Use a truth table to show whether the proposition p v (q - "p) is a tautology, a contradiction or…

A: A compound statement is called tautology when it is true for all true value assignment for its…

Q: Show that ((p→q) v (~(p ^ ~q) ^ T)) ≡ ~p v q using the logical equivalences.

A: Logical equivalences of (( p → q) v (~(p ^ ~q) ^ T)) ≡ ~p v q is described in step 2.

Q: For each numbered line that is not a premise in each of the formal proofs that follow state the rule…

A: Below is the answer to above question. I hope this will be helpful for you...

Q: Determine if the following specifications are consistent. (In other words, determine if their…

A: First lets understand what satisfiable means: -a boolean expression is said to be satisfiable, if it…

Q: Prove that the (P⇒Q) ⇔ (¬P∨Q) is valid by constructing a truth table.

A: An expression is valid only if it follows the tautology, that is, it has all true values. The above…

Q: Show that A → B and ¬B –→ ¬A are logically equivalent by constructing the appropriate truth table…

A: As given, I need to show that A→B and ¬B→¬A are logically equivalent by constructing a truth table…

Q: Covert it into Degulas epusicn

Q: Without using the whole truth table, decide whether the following statement is a tautology, a…

A: A =>B is ~A ∨ B ~(A∨B) = ~A ∧ ~B A∨F = A

Q: Make a truth table for the following statement and then determine whether it is a tautology, a self-…

Q: 7) Without using truth tables, show that p(qr) and q- (pvr) are logically equivalent. Show…

Q: Construct truth table and identify if it’s tautology, contradiction, or contingency. (a) [(p V q) ∧…

A: tautology: compound proposition which is always True. contradiction: compound proposition which is…

Q: Using a truth table, classify each of the following as a contradiction, a tautology, or a…

A: A) p<->q = ! ( p x-or q ) p q p<->q T T T T T F T F F T F T p q p…

Q: Use propositional logic (direct or indirect proof) to prove the following theorems a. ¬ (p ∨ ¬q) ∧…

A: Tautological implication : Let 'P' and 'Q' are two propositional function then 'P' tautological…

Question

Consider the following resolution proof:
1. Р(x)
P
2. ду, а) V -р(а) Р
3. ¬q(a, a)
4. ду, а)
5. qа, а)
6.
Is this proof correct?

Expert Solution

This question has been solved!

Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.

SEE SOLUTION Check out a sample Q&A here

Step 1

VIEW

Step 2

VIEW

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps with 1 images

SEE SOLUTION Check out a sample Q&A here

Knowledge Booster

Learn more about

Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, computer-science and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.

Similar questions

Construct truth table and identify if it’s tautology, contradiction, or contingency. (a) [(p V q) ∧ r] → [(p V r) ∧ (q V r)] (b) ((p → r) Ʌ (r → q)) → (q → p)
1. Using the truth table Determine whether: a) (¬p → ¬q ) ∨ (p → ¬q) is equivalent to p ∨ ¬p b) ¬p ∨ (p ˄ q) is equivalent to p ↔ ¬q 2. Show the following statement is contraction, a tautology, or neither. (p→(q→r))↔ (p ˄ q →r) SHOW YOUR WORK AND ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS PLEASE!
Using semantic tableaux prove the following first-order statement is valid. ⊢ (∀x.p(x) ∨ ∀x.q(x)) → ∀x.(p(x) ∨ q(x)) Clearly indicate which rule was applied at each step.
1): Select the law which shows that the two propositions are logically equivalent. ¬((w∨p)∧(¬q∧¬w)) ¬(w∨p)∨¬(¬q∧¬w) A): DeMorgan’s law B): Distributive law C): Associative law D): Complement law 2): Select the proposition that is a tautology. (p∧q)→¬p (p∨q)→p (p∧q)↔p 4 . (p∧q)→p A): 4 B): 1 C): 2 D): 3
a = (P→ (Q→R)) → ((P→Q) → (P→ R)) is a tautology or not ? Prove .
2) (L2) Prove using laws of logic that the conditional proposition (p ∧ q) → r is equivalent to (p ∧ ¬ r) →¬ q. 3) (L3) Show that the converse of a conditional proposition p: q → r is equivalent to the inverse of proposition p using a truth table. 4.1) (L4) Show whether ((p ∧ (p→q)) ↔ ¬p) is a tautology or not. Use a truth table and be specific about which row(s)/column(s) of the truth table justify your answer. 4.2) (L4) Give truth values for the propositional variables that cause the two expressions to have different truth values. For example, given p ∨ q and p ⊕ q, the correct answer would be p = q = T, because when p and q are both true, p ∨ q is true but p ⊕ q is false. Note that there may be more than one correct answer. r ∧ (p ∨ q) (r ∧ p) ∨ q
Use truth-tables to test whether each of the following two arguments are semantically valid, and if either is not valid then provide a counter-example.(i) (P→Q), (Q→R) ⊨ (¬R→¬P)(ii) (P∧Q)∨(P∧R), (Q∧P)→R, ⊨ (R∨P) <->Q
Do not use truth tables and construct a chain of logical equivalances to prove that: (~q ^ r) -> (p -> q) ≡ (~q) -> (p -> ~r)
1.1 Determine whether ( p∨q)∧(p→r)∧( q→s)→r∨s is a Tautology or a contradiction 1.3 Using a Truth table, determine the value of the compound proposition((p∨ q) ∧ (¬p∨ r)) → (q ∨ r)
Which of the following are tautology, contradiction, contingent, consistent, inconsistent, logically equivalent, or logically consequence: a) (p v q → r) → ((p → r) ˄ (q → r)) b) (p v q) ↔ ((p v ¬ q) ˄ q) c) ¬((p → q) → ¬(q → p)) d) ¬p → ¬q and ¬(q ˄ ¬p) e) p v (q ˄ r) and (p v q) ˄ (p v r)
Recall that the biconditional p↔q stands for(p→q)∧(q→p). Construct a truth table to verify that thestatement p↔q is equivalent to the statement (p∧q)∨((¬p)∧(¬q)).
1): ¬( p ∨ q ) ≡ ¬p ∧ ¬q The above law is called Group of answer choices De Morgans Law Absorption Law Complement Law Double Negation Law 2): To prove the this identity ¬p → (q → r) ≡ q → (p ∨ r) The following reasoning is valid: ¬p → (q → r)¬¬p ∨ (q → r) Conditional identity p ∨ (q → r) Double negation law p ∨ (¬q ∨ r) Conditional identity (p ∨ ¬q) ∨ r Associative law (¬q ∨p) ∨ r Commutative law ¬q ∨ (p ∨ r) Associative law q → (p ∨ r) Conditional identity Group of answer choices True False