Consider the following schedule, S1, containing eight transactions, where R and W represent read and write operations, respectively. Construct a precedence graph for the schedule S1. With reference to the precedence graph, state the reasons why you consider schedule S1 to be or not to be conflict serializable. T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 17 T8 R(b) R(z) R(j) R(z) W(h) W(g) W(x)

Consider the following schedule, S1, containing eight transactions, where R and W represent read and write operations, respectively. Construct a precedence graph for the schedule S1. With reference to the precedence graph, state the reasons why you consider schedule S1 to be or not to be conflict serializable. T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 17 T8 R(b) R(z) R(j) R(z) W(h) W(g) W(x)

Database System Concepts

7th Edition

ISBN:9780078022159

Author:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Publisher:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Chapter1: Introduction

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1PE

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Consider three transactions: T1, T2, and T3. S: W1(A); R2(A);W3(B); W2(A);W1(A); R2(C); R3(B); R3(A); W3(B); C1;C2;C3 a) Draw the precedence graph for the schedule. Is the schedule conflict- serializable? b) Is the schedule recoverable?
Give an example of a serializable schedule with two transactions such that the order in which the transactions commit is different from the serialization order
Consider the schedule S1 consists of three transactions T1, T2, T3 as the following: Answer the following question: Is the schedule S1 cascadeless and recoverable? Justify your answer. Draw the precedence graph of schedule S1 Is S1 conflict-serializable? Explain briefly. If S1 is conflict-serializable, write down all equivalent serial schedules.
Consider a schedule with 3 transactions with 2, 3, and 4 operations respectively. Calculate the possiblenumber ofc) Serial schedulesd) Non serial schedules
A failed transaction must be aborted. True or False? If the precedence graph of a schedule is acyclic, the schedule is serializable. True or False?
Consider a schedule with 4 transactions with 1, 2, 3, and 4 operations respectively. Calculate the possible number ofa) Serial schedulesb) Non serial schedules Please answer these question in detail with full explaination. I need a proper long answer. Thanks :)
Consider the schedule S1 = w1(A), r2(A), w1(B), w3(C), r2(C), r4(B), w2(D), w4(E), r5(D), w5(E) on five transactions T1, T2, . . . , T5. How many serial and how many non-serial schedules the above transactions T1, T2, . . . , T5 can have?
In timestamp ordering, W-timestamp(Q) denotes the largest timestamp of any transaction that executed write(Q) successfully. Suppose that, instead, we defined it to be the timestamp of the most recent transaction to execute write(Q) successfully. Would this change in wording make any difference? Explain your answer.
Q1. Suppose a transaction T accesses (for read or write operations), a certain set of objects {O1,...,Ok}. This is done in the following manner: Step 1. T acquires exclusive locks to O1, . . . , Ok in increasing order of their addresses. Step 2. The required operations are performed. Step 3. All locks are released. Which Concurrency control protocol will be suitable for the given scenario, justify the answer will schedule as an example
Explain the concept of two-phase commit (2PC) in the context of distributed transactions. How does it ensure transactional consistency?
The kind of recurrent transaction that notifies us whenever we should utilize an existing recurring transaction as the basis for entering a new transaction is
A new timestamp will be applied to a transaction in line with the ordering of timestamps if that transaction is rolled back. Why is it that it can't just keep the timestamp that it had before?