Homework Help is Here – Start Your Trial Now!
Math
Advanced Math
Consider the following statement. The sum of any two rational numbers is a rational number. The statement is true, but the following proposed proof is incorrect. Proposed proof: 1. Suppose r and s are any rational numbers. a 2. By definition of rational,r =- and s = for some integers a, b, c, and d with b * 0 and d # 0. a 3. By substitution, r +s = 9. 4. Thus r +s is a sum of two fractions, which is a fraction. 5. So r +s is a rational number since a rational number is a fraction. Identify the error(s) in the proposed proof. (Select all that apply.) The second sentence should say b = 0 and d = 0 instead of b # 0 and d # 0. The first sentence claims that r and s are rational numbers, which is equivalent to assuming what is to be proved. To prove the statement, r and s must have the same denominator. The fourth sentence assumes that a sum of two fractions is a fraction, which is equivalent to assuming what is to be proved. The second sentence should say a # 0 and c # 0 instead of b # 0 and d # 0.

Consider the following statement. The sum of any two rational numbers is a rational number. The statement is true, but the following proposed proof is incorrect. Proposed proof: 1. Suppose r and s are any rational numbers. a 2. By definition of rational,r =- and s = for some integers a, b, c, and d with b * 0 and d # 0. a 3. By substitution, r +s = 9. 4. Thus r +s is a sum of two fractions, which is a fraction. 5. So r +s is a rational number since a rational number is a fraction. Identify the error(s) in the proposed proof. (Select all that apply.) The second sentence should say b = 0 and d = 0 instead of b # 0 and d # 0. The first sentence claims that r and s are rational numbers, which is equivalent to assuming what is to be proved. To prove the statement, r and s must have the same denominator. The fourth sentence assumes that a sum of two fractions is a fraction, which is equivalent to assuming what is to be proved. The second sentence should say a # 0 and c # 0 instead of b # 0 and d # 0.

Algebra: Structure And Method, Book 1
Algebra: Structure And Method, Book 1
(REV)00th Edition
ISBN:9780395977224
Author:Richard G. Brown, Mary P. Dolciani, Robert H. Sorgenfrey, William L. Cole
Publisher:Richard G. Brown, Mary P. Dolciani, Robert H. Sorgenfrey, William L. Cole
Chapter11: Rational And Irrational Numbers
Section11.1: Properties Of Rational Numbers
Problem 36WE
See similar textbooks
icon
Related questions
Question
100%
Consider the following statement. The sum of any two rational numbers is a rational number. The statement is true, but the following proposed proof is incorrect. Proposed proof: 1. Suppose r and s are any rational numbers. 2. By definition of rational, r = and s = for some integers a, b, c, and d with b +0 and d # 0. 3. By substitution, r + s = 4. Thus r + s is a sum of two fractions, which is a fraction. 5. So r + s is a rational number since a rational number is a fraction. Identify the error(s) in the proposed proof. (Select all that apply.) O The second sentence should say b = 0 and d = 0 instead of b + 0 and d + 0. O The first sentence claims that r and s are rational numbers, which is equivalent to assuming what is to be proved. O To prove the statement, r and s must have the same denominator. O The fourth sentence assumes that a sum of two fractions is a fraction, which is equivalent to assuming what is to be proved. O The second sentence should say a # 0 and c + 0 instead of b + 0 and d + 0.
Transcribed Image Text:Consider the following statement. The sum of any two rational numbers is a rational number. The statement is true, but the following proposed proof is incorrect. Proposed proof: 1. Suppose r and s are any rational numbers. 2. By definition of rational, r = and s = for some integers a, b, c, and d with b +0 and d # 0. 3. By substitution, r + s = 4. Thus r + s is a sum of two fractions, which is a fraction. 5. So r + s is a rational number since a rational number is a fraction. Identify the error(s) in the proposed proof. (Select all that apply.) O The second sentence should say b = 0 and d = 0 instead of b + 0 and d + 0. O The first sentence claims that r and s are rational numbers, which is equivalent to assuming what is to be proved. O To prove the statement, r and s must have the same denominator. O The fourth sentence assumes that a sum of two fractions is a fraction, which is equivalent to assuming what is to be proved. O The second sentence should say a # 0 and c + 0 instead of b + 0 and d + 0.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps with 2 images

SEE SOLUTIONCheck out a sample Q&A here
Blurred answer
Recommended textbooks for you
Algebra: Structure And Method, Book 1
Algebra: Structure And Method, Book 1
Algebra
ISBN:
9780395977224
Author:
Richard G. Brown, Mary P. Dolciani, Robert H. Sorgenfrey, William L. Cole
Publisher:
McDougal Littell
Elements Of Modern Algebra
Elements Of Modern Algebra
Algebra
ISBN:
9781285463230
Author:
Gilbert, Linda, Jimmie
Publisher:
Cengage Learning,
Algebra & Trigonometry with Analytic Geometry
Algebra & Trigonometry with Analytic Geometry
Algebra
ISBN:
9781133382119
Author:
Swokowski
Publisher:
Cengage
Elementary Geometry For College Students, 7e
Elementary Geometry For College Students, 7e
Geometry
ISBN:
9781337614085
Author:
Alexander, Daniel C.; Koeberlein, Geralyn M.
Publisher:
Cengage,
SEE MORE TEXTBOOKS