Discuss the challenges of private security in terms of licensing, regulating, hiring and and training.
Discuss the challenges of private security in terms of licensing, regulating, hiring and and training.
Knowing the reach and weaknesses of government security legislation is critical.
For example, Take licensing. Occupational licensing is popular for occupations that may have serious adverse effects on individuals, such as medicine, law, or mechanical design, so basic contention licensing standards to protect their residents (and, of necessity, to protect careers). And they also have licensing standards, from bricklayers to pathologists, for all sorts of other areas of work. Security staff is also mandated by most states to be approved.
->Security licensing requirements involve factors such as age, qualifications, and waiting periods. Some countries do a good job internationally-see below for many instances that spring to mind: Israel, Africa, and the UK. Many nations have minimal requirements for licensing that inspire limited trust. Licensing conditions within the US differ wildly from state to state. The good news is that most US states (41) currently require the licensing of security staff and therefore live up to a set of basic requirements. The bad news is that such norms fluctuate so widely that they can not be comparable, and that "minimum requirements" can be so limited that they have been practically meaningless.
-- > No background checks of security personnel are needed by seven US states, and only three have developed reliable systems that use FBI data to perform in-depth, nationwide security screening, even though it is possible by federal law.
-> Some US law requires security guards to attend at least 40 hours of training, which is reasonably acceptable but, in our view, uninteresting. The majority ask for even less. Some require annual training sessions, most of which do not. Nine states do not have security officers' laws at all. More than 20 states do not allow unarmed training courses at all. In order to be a licensed security officer, South Carolina requires a total of four hours of training, then another four hours to be licensed as an armed security officer. Try comparing this to the mandatory training standards of South Carolina of 300 hours to become a licensed manicurist, and you start to get a feeling of how unreasonable and futile reporting standards can be.
-- > For all sorts of reasons, legislative attempts to tighten rules get stuck. In several areas, pro-regulatory sentiment prohibits new legislation that imposes fresh constraints. Both big security companies and mom-and-pop businesses are lobbying against stricter legislation that would require them to invest more training money. Government agencies are balking at legislation requiring stronger background checks, as they will incur further costs.
Lack of quality of personnel, use of suboptimal technology in the workplace, high turnover rates, and requirements related to the procurement of firearms for defense is the biggest odds facing the private police company in general.
Step by step
Solved in 4 steps
