Do solve it as soon as possible Identify which statement is not correct. In a takeover bid to acquire a part or all shares in another company: Select one: a. Friendly merger reduces the chance of overpaying for target’s shares. b. Successful acquirer is likely to pay more for target’s shares in scenarios that include multiple rival bidders. c. Target company management would not accept an offer where the consideration for target’s shares exceeds the NPV of the merger. d. Hostile takeover may result in overpaying for target’s shares

Do solve it as soon as possible Identify which statement is not correct. In a takeover bid to acquire a part or all shares in another company: Select one: a. Friendly merger reduces the chance of overpaying for target’s shares. b. Successful acquirer is likely to pay more for target’s shares in scenarios that include multiple rival bidders. c. Target company management would not accept an offer where the consideration for target’s shares exceeds the NPV of the merger. d. Hostile takeover may result in overpaying for target’s shares

Business/Professional Ethics Directors/Executives/Acct

8th Edition

ISBN:9781337485913

Author:BROOKS

Publisher:BROOKS

Chapter5: Corporate Ethical Governance & Accountabililty

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 13.4EC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Two large, publicly owned firms are contemplating a merger. No operating synergy isexpected. However, because returns on the two firms are not perfectly positively correlated,the standard deviation of earnings would be reduced for the combined corporation. Onegroup of consultants argues that this risk reduction is sufficient grounds for the merger.Another group thinks that this type of risk reduction is irrelevant because stockholders canhold the stock of both companies and thus gain the risk-reduction benefits without all thehassles and expenses of the merger. Whose position is correct? Explain.
Which of the following is NOT normally regarded as being a barrier to hostile takeovers? a. Abnormally high executive compensation. b. Targeted share repurchases. c. Poison pills. d. Shareholder rights provisions. e. Restricted voting rights.
The minority stakeholders may exchange their P100 par value shares for P400 cash in case they do not agree with the acquisition what type of anti-hostile takeover strategy ???
Diversification is considered a dubious reason for merger because:Select one: a. Risk reduction is achieved by more by bondholders than stockholders b. Personal diversification is possible by the shareholders themselves c. Diversification only minimizes unsystematic risk d. All of the above
Why might one company have to complete more due diligence than another in a merger? A. None of these answers B. It is important for a company to know what it is buying C. Acquisitions can be risky D. If there is a large size discrepancy the merger seems more like an aquis
Which defense tactic, against hostile takeovers, is described below? Oscorp, a technology company and military contractor, has presented a tender offer for shares of Stark Industries at $50 per share. Stark Industries is worried what might happen if Oscorp gets access to their research and development division, so they are opposed to that take over. They ask all employees to vote against the decision, and buy up any available stock at above market rates. They justify this as best for the corporation, because if acquired Tony Stark, the CEO, would receive a severance of over $500M. A. Long-range acquisition strategy B. White Knight Tactic C. Golden Parachutes D. Scorched Earth Tactics
It is often difficult to draw a distinctive line between mergers and takeovers, and the terms tend to be used rather loosely to describe the process by which firms combine. In principle, a merger may be defined as a combination of firms of approximately equal standings on the basis of an agreement between their respective managements who recognize some mutual advantage in he arrangement. A merger can result in a new company being formed or one of the two companies absorbs the other. Required: i. Describe various types of mergers and critically discuss the motives for undertaking mergers and takeover. ii. Identify the organ(s) or institution(s) that regulates/approves the mergers and acquisitions in Tanzania and discuss all steps/procedures to be undertaken by the merging companies in Tanzania as required by the regulator for a merger to be successful. iii. Identify any recent Merger and Acquisition in Tanzania, discuss its type and the motive behind it.
The following graph represents the Cumulative Average Abnormal Return (CAAR) for the stocks of companies targeted for take-over. Which of the following statements is true? a. In a weak form efficient market, t* is the actual takeover event (i.e. the time when the legal takeover transaction is completed) b. In a semi-strong form efficient market, t* is the takeover announcement event c. In a strong form efficient market, t* is the acquiring company takeover decision event (i.e. the time when an acquiring company decides to launch a takeover) d. (a) & (b) e. (b) & (c)
What options does a company have if its board or management is opposed to an acquisition, a merger, or a takeover?
a) What is a conglomerate merger and why are they more likely to be approved? b) Limit pricing is a strategy where a firm sets a low, but profitable, price to discourage entry. How does that differ from predatory pricing? c) What is "Share the gain, share the pain" theory?
Many firms have devised defenses that make it more difficult or costly for other firms to take them over. How might such defenses affect the firm's agency problems? Are managers of firms with formidable takeover defenses more or less likely to act in the shareholders' interests rather than their own? What would you expect to happen to the share price when management proposes to institute such defenses?
Describe some of the positives and negatives from the point of view of both the acquirer and the target in a merger. What is the usual impact on the stock prices of each?