eddor and colleagues (Beddor et al., 2002) recorded American English speakers producing 15 different types of made-up non-words (shown in the table above). The words were balanced such that each of the three initial target vowels (V1; shown in bold text) [i a u] occurs before each of five context vowels (V2) [i e a o u]. This design allowed the researchers to investigate the anticipatory (co-articulatory) influences of each context vowel (V2) on each preceding target vowel (V1). From the perspective of the listener, what implications may co-articulation have for vowel perception? (Hint: Do you think co-articulatory patterns might present a challenge to listeners, and/or do you think that they might be informative to listeners?)
Beddor and colleagues (Beddor et al., 2002) recorded American English speakers producing 15 different types of made-up non-words (shown in the table above). The words were balanced such that each of the three initial target vowels (V1; shown in bold text) [i a u] occurs before each of five context vowels (V2) [i e a o u]. This design allowed the researchers to investigate the anticipatory (co-articulatory) influences of each context vowel (V2) on each preceding target vowel (V1).
From the perspective of the listener, what implications may co-articulation have for vowel perception? (Hint: Do you think co-articulatory patterns might present a challenge to listeners, and/or do you think that they might be informative to listeners?)
In this question we have to discuss the potential implications of co-articulation for vowel perception from the perspective of the listener.
Hope this helps if you find any query on the solution you may utilize threaded question feature.
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps