Evaluates the weather forecasting system. Take a backward chaining to conclude that there is a possibility of rain when it is observed that the sun is behind the clouds and the air is very heavy and cool. Show your work and gives the conclusion. Weather forecasting system rules. Rule 1: IF we suspect temperature is less than 20o AND there is humidity in the air THEN there is possibility of rain Rule 2: IF sun is behind the clouds AND air is very cool THEN we suspect temperature is less than 200 Rule 3 IF air is very heavy THEN there is humidity in the air

Evaluates the weather forecasting system. Take a backward chaining to conclude that there is a possibility of rain when it is observed that the sun is behind the clouds and the air is very heavy and cool. Show your work and gives the conclusion. Weather forecasting system rules. Rule 1: IF we suspect temperature is less than 20o AND there is humidity in the air THEN there is possibility of rain Rule 2: IF sun is behind the clouds AND air is very cool THEN we suspect temperature is less than 200 Rule 3 IF air is very heavy THEN there is humidity in the air

Database System Concepts

7th Edition

ISBN:9780078022159

Author:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Publisher:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Chapter1: Introduction

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1PE

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

adding on to the question: Now choose the detector height (on one side, i.e., y > 0 or y < 0) thatcorresponds to an angle where the first minimum in the intensity pattern is expected.formula given in the picture below m = 1. Repeat thecomputations with three paths as before (passing through yi = 0, and yi = ±a/2),and obtain the relative arrival probability. What is the intensity ratio compared tothe central detector location yd = 0?
1. Given the Bayesian network shown in the attached figure that establishes the relations between events on the burglary-earthquake-alarm domain, together with complete specifications of all probability distributions, please answer the following questions. a. On the network in Figure 2, what is the probability of the following event:event = (burglary = false) ∧ (earthquake = true) ∧ (alarm = false) ∧ (JohnCalls = true) ∧ (MaryCalls = false). b. On the network in Figure 2, what is the probability of the following event:event = (earthquake = true)∧(alarm = false)∧(JohnCalls = true)∧(MaryCalls = false).
For the following proposition, describe (i) a model on which it is true, and (ii) a model on which it is false. If there is no model of one of these types, explain why. ∀x(Px→(Rxx∨∃y(Qy∧Rxy)))
Use rules of inference to show that if ∀x(P (x) ∨ Q(x)) and ∀x((¬P (x) ∧ Q(x)) → R(x)) are true, then ∀x(¬R(x) → P (x)) is also true, where the domains of all quantifiers are the same
Given below are some facts and predicates for some knowledge base (KB). State if the unification for either variable x or y is possible or not. If the unification is possible then show the unified values for variables x and y. a. American (Bob), American (y) b. Enemy (Nono, America), Enemy(x,y) c. Weapon (Missile), soldTo (Missile, y), Weapon (x), soldTo (x, Nono) d. L(x, y), (L(y, x) ^ L(A, B))
Let’s say, you are given a task to identify the community which is severely infected by a virus such as Covid-19. As an environmental engineer, using the concepts of conditional probability, how can you develop a mathematical model to identify the infected community. Write all the parameters and show their relationships?
Consider the following equation that defines the conditions under which a square is breezy in the Wumpus World: ∀x,y Breezy(x, y) ⇔ ∃u,v Adjacent(u, v, x, y)∧Pit(u, v). Here we consider two other ways to describe this aspect of the Wumpus World. We can write diagnostic rulesleading from observed effects to hidden causes. For finding pits, the obvious diagnostic rules say that if a square is breezy, some adjacent square must contain a pit; and if a square is not breezy, then no adjacent square contains a pit. Write these two rules in first-order logic and show that their conjunction is logically equivalent to equation above. We can write causal rulesleading from cause to effect. One obvious causal rule is that a pit causes all adjacent squares to be breezy. Write this rule in first-order logic, explain why it is incomplete compared to equation above, and supply the missing axiom.
Consider the following knowledge base and infer “Ahmed is an advocate” using appropriate inferencing algorithm.i. Anyone who drives any CJ is a rough character.ii. Every driver drives is either a CJ or a Wrangler.iii. Anyone who drives any Wrangler is an urban professional.iv. Every urban professional is an advocate.v. Any nice girl does not date anyone who is a rough character.vi. Sara is a nice girl, and Ahmed is a driver.
Suppose that Iris and Kelvin are involved in a romantic relationship, unknown to anyone else in the company. Romantic relationships between employees are not against company policy, but married employees are specifically prohibited from being in a direct reporting relationship with each other. Should Iris inform Charlie about her relationship with Kelvin if she does not plan to apply for the transfer? If Iris does apply for the job but has no current plans for marriage, should she inform Charlie of her relationship?
The definition of indistinguishability in Definitions 3.8 (page 55), 3.18 (page 70), 3.21 (pages 73-74) and 3.22 (page 74) all follow the pattern: Pr[Adversary success] ≤ 1/2 + negl(n). It is suggested that we could equivalently state these as: Pr[Adversary success] = 1/2 + negl(n) (where + denotes plus or minus). Discuss.
2. Consider the network for car diagnosis shown in the figure above. a. Extend the network with the Boolean variables IcyWeather and StarterMotor .b. How many independent probability values do your network tables contain? Write the values on the network you created for each variable.
Consider a scenario of ROP radar system used on Oman roads to issue fines on speed limits, by taking your own example, explain the logical operators. *and *or