For all asymptotically positive f(n).f(n) + O(f(n)) = 8 (f(n)) The worst-case running time and expected running time are equal to within constant factors for any randomized algorithm. There exists a data structure to maintain a dynamic set with operations Insert (x,S), Delete(x,S) and member? (x,S) tha running time of O(1) per operation.

For all asymptotically positive f(n).f(n) + O(f(n)) = 8 (f(n)) The worst-case running time and expected running time are equal to within constant factors for any randomized algorithm. There exists a data structure to maintain a dynamic set with operations Insert (x,S), Delete(x,S) and member? (x,S) tha running time of O(1) per operation.

Database System Concepts

7th Edition

ISBN:9780078022159

Author:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Publisher:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Chapter1: Introduction

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1PE

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Precisely specify the conditions under which the following algorithm returns true, and then discuss, in detail, the running time of the algorithm. If you think it has different best- and worst-case running times then these should be considered separately, and you should explain the conditions under which best and worst cases arise. explain your answer and use O, Ω and ø Algorithm Ex1 ((?1, ... ??), (?1, ... , ??)) ?←0 for ? ← 1 to ? do ?←1 while ? ≤ ? do If ?? ==?? ?←?+1 ?←?+1 return ? > 0
Question 15 pap Suppose we have a Monte Carlo algorithm, A, and a deterministic algorithm, B, for testing if the output of A is correct. How can we use A and B to construct a Las Vegas algorithm? Also, if A succeeds with probability ½ and both A and B run O(n) time, what is the expected running time of the Las Vegas algorithm that is produced? Full explain this question and text typing work only We should answer our question within 2 hours takes more time then we will reduce Rating Dont ignore this line
Precisely specify the conditions under which the following algorithm returns True, and then discuss, in detail, the running time of the algorithm. If you think it has different best- and worst-case running times then these should be considered separately, and you should explain the conditions under which best and worst-cases arise.
Simulated annealing is an extension of hill climbing, which uses randomness to avoid getting stuck in local maxima and plateaux. a) As defined in your textbook, simulated annealing returns the current state when the end of the annealing schedule is reached and if the annealing schedule is slow enough. Given that we know the value (measure of goodness) of each state we visit, is there anything smarter we could do? (b) Simulated annealing requires a very small amount of memory, just enough to store two states: the current state and the proposed next state. Suppose we had enough memory to hold two million states. Propose a modification to simulated annealing that makes productive use of the additional memory. In particular, suggest something that will likely perform better than just running simulated annealing a million times consecutively with random restarts. [Note: There are multiple correct answers here.] (c) Gradient ascent search is prone to local optima just like hill climbing.…
Implement an algorithmic solution, indicating which states are valid and which are not, and model the space of the following problem: An interest group from a small town decided to sue a company for commercial abuse. For this, the people have organized themselves and decided to send 3 representatives, who will have to travel in a Van to the city where the lawsuit will be filed. The company to be sued, upon learning of these actions, has decided to send 3 lawyers to persuade the representatives, who will also travel in the same Van for that purpose. The community must file the class action suit under these conditions: - The three applicants must reach the destination city; - Only two people can travel per trip in the Van (small town - city, city - small town); - There can never be more lawyers than plaintiffs in any one place (either in the small town or city) because the lawyers can persuade the plaintiffs and as a consequence, the lawsuit would not be made; - The Van cannot be…
Conceptual Question: How do you find the Big Oh, Big Omega, and Big Theta of an Algorithm? What do each of them mean? Can you provide an example for solving for each with some algorithm? Like... (Java) for (i = 1; i < n; i++) { j = i; while ((j > 0) && (s[j] < s[j-1])) { temp = s[j]; s[j] = s[j-1]; s[j-1] = temp; } j--; } And what about if Algorithm is recurssive like... public int runBinarySearchRecursively(int[] sortedArray, int key, int low, int high) { int middle = (low + high) / 2; if (high < low) { return -1; } if (key == sortedArray[middle]) { return middle; } else if (key < sortedArray[middle]) { return runBinarySearchRecursively(sortedArray, key, low, middle - 1); } else { return runBinarySearchRecursively(sortedArray, key, middle + 1, high); } }
What is the growth rate of the following algorithm? Is the worst case different than the average case? Why? y = 1; for (i=1; i<=n; i++) { for (j=1; j<=n; j++) { x = A[i] + A[j]; x = x * y; } y = y + x; }
Determine how many additions are done in the worst case scenario of the following code. Assume that all variables are properly declared. y = 1; for (i=1; i<=n;i++) { for (j = 1; j<=n;j++) { x = i + j; x = x * y; } x = y + x; }
Respond to two other classmates’ postings by critically reviewing your classmate's answer. The question: Differentiate between Big O, big Omega(Ω) and big theta, and which one you think is better to measure your algorithm efficiency, justify? 1st Answer: The better way to measure an algorithm is Big O because, in the worst-case scenario, we determine an algorithm's upper bound on execution time. We need to understand the scenario in which most operations are carried out. The worst scenario for a linear search is when an element x to be searched, is empty from the array. When x is empty, the search() method compares it with elements in arr[] one by one. Then that will show us the worst case of the algorithm which makes it easier to compare it to other classifications. 2nd Answer: The better way to measure an algorithm is Big O because we use big O notation is important when working with algorithms. We can develop efficient algorithms which can lead to less code(space complexity)…
The next two questions refer to the following belief network with random variablesF0,F1,…,F4 which only take the values 0 and 1. Which of the following statements are true about this belief network (1), (3) and (4) only :(1) F0 and F3 are independent given F1,F2 ;(2) F0 and F2 are independent;(3) P(F0∣F1,F2)=P(F0∣F1,F2,F3,F4) ;(4) F0 and F4 are independent. In general, to define the joint probability distribution P(F0,…,F4) one requires up to 25−1 entries in the table of probabilities. For the belief network above, one can compute the joint probability distribution P(F0,…,F4) using the following number of conditional probabilities
. Give a semi-formal Natural Deduction proof of the following claim. You may only usethe eight Natural Deduction rules and no equivalence rules (such as De Morgan’s Laws).Claim. (R ∧S) →¬Q, R →S ⊢(R ∧P ) →¬(P ∧Q)
Assume the propositions p, q, r, and s have the following truth values:p : False (F). q : True (T). r : False (F). s : True (T). Evaluate the truth value for each of the following compound propositions. Show your work for yourevaluation.a) (p ∨ q) ∧ ¬ rb) p ∨ q ∧ ¬ rc) ¬(r ∨ s) → p ∨ qd) r ⊕ ¬s ↔ q → pe) (p ∧ ¬q) ⊕ (r → (¬s ∨ q))