For each numbered line that is not a premise in each of the formal proofs that follow state the rule of inference/replacement that justifies it. ( V - כ(UT) .1 ( ( (WX) כ U) כ T) .2 3. ((T · V) ɔ ~ (W v X)) .: (W = X) 4. ((T · U) ɔ (W·X)) 5. (T · V) ɔ (~ W . ~ X)) 6. ((T · U) Ɔ (W ·X)) ·((T· V) ɔ (~ W . ~ X)) 7. (T · U v (T . V)) 8. ((W· X) V (~W v ~ X) 9. (W = X) Prompts Submitted Answers How did we arrive with line number 4? 2. Exportation How did we arrive with line number 5? 3, De Morgan's Theorem How did we arrive with line number 6? Choose a match How did we arrive with line number 7? Choose a match How did we arrive with line number 8? Choose a match How did we arrive with line number 9? Choose a match

For each numbered line that is not a premise in each of the formal proofs that follow state the rule of inference/replacement that justifies it. ( V - כ(UT) .1 ( ( (WX) כ U) כ T) .2 3. ((T · V) ɔ ~ (W v X)) .: (W = X) 4. ((T · U) ɔ (W·X)) 5. (T · V) ɔ (~ W . ~ X)) 6. ((T · U) Ɔ (W ·X)) ·((T· V) ɔ (~ W . ~ X)) 7. (T · U v (T . V)) 8. ((W· X) V (~W v ~ X) 9. (W = X) Prompts Submitted Answers How did we arrive with line number 4? 2. Exportation How did we arrive with line number 5? 3, De Morgan's Theorem How did we arrive with line number 6? Choose a match How did we arrive with line number 7? Choose a match How did we arrive with line number 8? Choose a match How did we arrive with line number 9? Choose a match

Elementary Geometry For College Students, 7e

7th Edition

ISBN:9781337614085

Author:Alexander, Daniel C.; Koeberlein, Geralyn M.

Publisher:Alexander, Daniel C.; Koeberlein, Geralyn M.

Chapter2: Parallel Lines

Section2.CT: Test

Problem 3CT: To prove a theorem of the form "If P, then Q" by the indirect method, the first line of the proof...

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

There are two kinds of inhabitants in an island, one is knights, who always tell the truth, and the other, their opposites, knaves, who always lie. If you encounter three people P, Q, and R. What are P, Q, and R, if P says “Q and R are the same types”, Q says “R is knave”, and R says “P and R is the opposite types”? Show your work in detail and validate your answer in a mathematical way using truth table or proposition.
As a proof not as a construction
Give formal well-written proofs when you are proving a result or a counter example otherwise
2. When is it true that u+ v=v+u?
Explain the logic of a Kruskal–Wallis test.
In a recent study, 20 males used a new weight-loss supplement, and all but 4 of them experienced weight loss after two weeks. In the same study, 100 female used the same supplement, and all but 38 of them experienced weight loss after two weeks. Fil in the blanks below to make the most reasonable statement possible.
A negation for “Some R have property S” is “
Which statements below are true? Select all that apply. A.if p --> q are q are true, then p is true. B.if p --> q and p are true, then q is true. C.if p --> q and q --> r are true, then p --> r is true D.if p --> q and r are true then q --> r is true
Construct a formal proof of validity by adding onlythree statements to the given premises using the rules of inference. Also indicate the number where you based the proof.
Give formal well-written proofs when you are proving a result or a counter example otherwise. (Accidentally submitted a question without important 2nd half of question)
I need to prove that these statements are false.
To prove a theorem of the form "If P, then Q" by the indirect method, the first line of the proof should read: Suppose that ___________ is true.