From the following analysis of three independent projects to select the best bundle at a given capital limitation of $50.000. Initial Investment, %$4 -37,000 -15,000 -24,000 Expected Life, Years PW at 14% Project per year, 4,400 3,820 2,450 A B. 8 Which of the following is the statement for the leftover of the best option? None of the listed options $24,000 reinvest it at MARR for 8 years $11,000 reinvest it at MARR for 7 years $11,000 reinvest it at MARR for 8 years $6,000 reinvest it at MARR for 7 years $6,000 reinvest it at MARR for 8 years O $15,000 reinvest it at MARR for 5 years

From the following analysis of three independent projects to select the best bundle at a given capital limitation of $50.000. Initial Investment, %$4 -37,000 -15,000 -24,000 Expected Life, Years PW at 14% Project per year, 4,400 3,820 2,450 A B. 8 Which of the following is the statement for the leftover of the best option? None of the listed options $24,000 reinvest it at MARR for 8 years $11,000 reinvest it at MARR for 7 years $11,000 reinvest it at MARR for 8 years $6,000 reinvest it at MARR for 7 years $6,000 reinvest it at MARR for 8 years O $15,000 reinvest it at MARR for 5 years

Survey of Accounting (Accounting I)

8th Edition

ISBN:9781305961883

Author:Carl Warren

Publisher:Carl Warren

Chapter15: Capital Investment Analysis

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 15.3.1P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Project S has a cost of $10,000 and is expected to produce benefits (cash flows) of $3,000 per year for 5 years. Project L costs $25,000 and is expected to produce cash flows of $7,400 per year for 5 years. Calculate the two projects’ NPVs, IRRs, MIRRs, and PIs, assuming a cost of capital of 12%. Which project would be selected, assuming they are mutually exclusive, using each ranking method? Which should actually be selected?
Capital rationing decision involving four proposals Kopecky Industries Inc. is considering allocating a limited amount of capital investment funds among four proposals. The amount of proposed investment, estimated income from operations, and net cash flow for each proposal are as follows: The company’s capital rationing policy requires a maximum cash payback period of three years. In addition, a minimum average rate of return of 12% is required on allprojects. 1f the preceding standards are met, the net present value method and presentvalue indexes are used to rank the remaining proposals. Instructions Compute the present value index for each oldie proposals in part (4). Round to two decimal places.
Clearcast Communications Inc. is considering allocating a limited amount of capital investment funds among four proposals. The amount of proposed investment, estimated operating income, and net cash flow for each proposal are as follows: The companys capital rationing policy requires a maximum cash payback period of three years. In addition, a minimum average rate of return of 12% is required on all projects. If the preceding standards are met, the net present value method and present value indexes are used to rank the remaining proposals. Instructions 1. Compute the cash payback period for each of the four proposals. 2. Giving effect to straight-line depreciation on the investments and assuming no estimated residual value, compute the average rate of return for each of the four proposals. Round to one decimal place. 3. Using the following format, summarize the results of your computations in parts (1) and (2). By placing the computed amounts in the first two columns on the left and by placing a check mark in the appropriate column to the right, indicate which proposals should be accepted for further analysis and which should be rejected. 4. For the proposals accepted for further analysis in part (3), compute the net present value. Use a rate of 12% and the present value table appearing in Exhibit 2 of this chapter. 5. Compute the present value index for each of the proposals in part (4). Round to two decimal places. 6. Rank the proposals from most attractive to least attractive, based on the present values of net cash flows computed in part (4). 7. Rank the proposals from most attractive to least attractive, based on the present value indexes computed in part (5). 8. Based on the analyses, comment on the relative attractiveness of the proposals ranked in parts (6) and (7).
Redbird Company is considering a project with an initial investment of $265,000 in new equipment that will yield annual net cash flows of $45,800 each year over its seven-year life. The companys minimum required rate of return is 8%. What is the internal rate of return? Should Redbird accept the project based on IRR?
Capital rationing decision for a service company involving four proposals Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating a limited amount of capital investment funds among four proposals. The amount of proposed investment, estimated operating income, and net cash flow for each proposal are as follows: The companys capital rationing policy requires a maximum cash payback period of three years. In addition, a minimum average rate of return of 12% is required on all projects. If the preceding standards are met, the net present value method and present value indexes are used to rank the remaining proposals. Instructions 1. Compute the cash payback period for each of the four proposals. 2. Giving effect to straight-line depreciation on the investments and assuming no estimated residual value, compute the average rate of return for each of the four proposals. (Round to one decimal place.) 3. Using the following format, summarize the results of your computations in parts (1) and (2). By placing the computed amounts in the first two columns on the left and by placing a check mark in the appropriate column to the right, indicate which proposals should be accepted for further analysis and which should be rejected. 4. For the proposals accepted for further analysis in part (3), compute the net present value. Use a rate of 15% and the present value table appearing in Exhibit 2 of this chapter. 5. Compute the present value index for each of the proposals in part (4). Round to two decimal places. 6. Rank the proposals from most attractive to least attractive, based on the present values of net cash flows computed in part (4). 7. Rank the proposals from most attractive to least attractive, based on the present value indexes computed in part (5). 8. Based on the analyses, comment on the relative attractiveness of the proposals ranked in parts (6) and (7).
Net present value method, present value index, and analysis for a service company First United Bank Inc. is evaluating three capital investment projects by using the net present value method. Relevant data related to the projects are summarized as follows: Instructions 1. Assuming that the desired rate of return is 15%, prepare a net present value analysis for each project. Use the present value table appearing in Exhibit 2 of this chapter. 2. Determine a present value index for each project. (Round to two decimal places.) 3. Which project offers the largest amount of present value per dollar of investment? Explain.