I have been working on the question below and I'm stuck on how to finish it up. I have provided what I've done so far. Is what I've done so far correct? And how do I finish up the problem? Here is the question: Suppose that C is the price of a European call option to purchase a security whose present price is S. Show that if C>S then there is an opportunity for arbitrage (i.e. risk-less profit). You may assume the interest rate is r=0 so that the present value calculations are unnecessary. My work so far: There is an opportunity for arbitrage if we can create a portfolio that initially (time t=0) generates a zero net cash flow or a cash inflow, but still produce a positive or zero cash inflow at the time of expiration. Assume we are going to short sell one call option C, and buy one stock S. Consider the cash flows at time t=0.Cash flow of selling one call option: +CCash flow of buying one stock: -STherefore, since C>S, we have an initial cash inflow of C-S>0. We will now consider the value at the time of expiration. (This is where I get stuck. Any advice/corrections are greatly appreciated. Thanks!)

I have been working on the question below and I'm stuck on how to finish it up. I have provided what I've done so far. Is what I've done so far correct? And how do I finish up the problem? Here is the question: Suppose that C is the price of a European call option to purchase a security whose present price is S. Show that if C>S then there is an opportunity for arbitrage (i.e. risk-less profit). You may assume the interest rate is r=0 so that the present value calculations are unnecessary. My work so far: There is an opportunity for arbitrage if we can create a portfolio that initially (time t=0) generates a zero net cash flow or a cash inflow, but still produce a positive or zero cash inflow at the time of expiration. Assume we are going to short sell one call option C, and buy one stock S. Consider the cash flows at time t=0.Cash flow of selling one call option: +CCash flow of buying one stock: -STherefore, since C>S, we have an initial cash inflow of C-S>0. We will now consider the value at the time of expiration. (This is where I get stuck. Any advice/corrections are greatly appreciated. Thanks!)

International Financial Management

14th Edition

ISBN:9780357130698

Author:Madura

Publisher:Madura

Chapter11: Managing Transaction Exposure

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1CT

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

I asked the question below earlier today, and got a response, but I didn't understand it. I'm sure the response was well written and clear, but I have a very limited background in this area and probably need more of a layman's terms explanation! Thanks. Suppose that C is the price of a European call option to purchase a security whose present price is S. Show that if C>S then there is an opportunity for arbitrage (ie. riskless profit). Assume the interest rate r=0 so present value calculations are unnecessary.
Suppose that C is the price of a European call option to purchase a security whose present price is S.Show that if C > S then there is an opportunity for arbitrage (i.e. riskless profit). You may assume theinterest rate is r = 0 so that present value calculations are unnecessary.
Suppose that C is the price of a European call option to purchase a security whose present price is S. Show that if C>S then there is an opportunity for arbitrage (i.e. risk-less profit). You may assume the interest rate is r=0 so that the present value calculations are unnecessary.
Suppose that C is the price of a European call option to purchase a security whose present price is S. Show that if C>S then there is an opportunity for arbitrage (ie. riskless profit). Assume the interest rate r=0 so present value calculations are unnecessary.
Which of the following statements about European option contracts is TRUE? a. Typically American options are cheaper than otherwise similar European options due to the uncertainty regarding the date of exercise. b. One can synthesise a long forward position in the underlying by being long a call and short a put c. A long call position and a short put position both involve buying the underlying and so are equivalent d. The price of an option can be obtained by computing the true probabilities of each state of nature, working out the expected option payoff across those states and then discounting back to the present.
To hedge payables, the firm will purchase a currency call option on the payable foreign currency. The firm can use the call option to buy foreign currency at a specified price. Why should the company, in this case, purchase a call option than a Forward contract? Maybe to make it easy on me, you can illustrate the answer by highlighting the situations suitable for options and Forward contracts. For example, "when this situation occurs....., then that hedging we should use .... because of XYZ reasons/effects on profitability".
Let C be the price of a call option to purchase a security whose present price is S. Explain why C is less than or equal to S. I'm just thinking it wouldn't make financial sense to pay more for the call option than the present price of the security. I'm not sure if there is more of an explanation that is needed. I was also wondering is there any time when it would be favorable to pay more for the call option than the present price of the security?
If I sell an at-the-money put option on the Euro and delta hedge it with a position in Euro according to the delta hedge ratio, which of the following is correct? I will need to buy Euro if the Euro weakens. I will need to sell Euro if the Euro strengthens. I will need to sell Euro if the Euro weakens
Which of the following statements about European option contracts is true? Question 2Answer a. Typically American options are cheaper than otherwise similar European options due to the uncertainty regarding the date of exercise. b. The price of an option can be obtained by computing the true probabilities of each state of nature, working out the expected option payoff across those states and then discounting back to the present. c. A long call position and a short put position both involve buying the underlying and so are equivalent d. One can synthesise a long forward position in the underlying by being long a call and short a put
My question is for a synthetic call option why do we need to borrow the present value of the strike price and what does it mean in a simple language explanation. Similarly why do we need to lend the present value of the stock at risk-free rate and what does it mean in simple language explanation? Please also clarify the significance of risk free rate? Why is it used in put call parity. Synthetic Call Option: If an investor believes that a call option is over-priced, then he/she can sell the call on the market and replicate a synthetic call. Borrow the present value of the strike price at the risk free rate and purchase the underlying stock and a put. Synthetic Put Option: Similar to the synthetic call option. A synthetic put can be created by re-arranging the put-call parity relationship, if the trader believes the put is overvalued. Synthetic Stock: A synthetic stock can also be created by rearranging the put-call parity identity. In this case, the investor will buy the…
Select all of the following statements that accurately compare or contrast forwards and options: Group of answer choices Taking naked long positions in either a call or forward will lead to an overall long position in the underlying security. Options and forwards always have identical payoffs if the spot price remains the same. Both options and forwards can be used to reduce exposure to foreign exchange risk. Going long a naked put option and going short a naked forward both cause unlimited liability. Both options and forwards require the payment of a premium at the initiation of the contract. Forward contracts impose obligations on both parties in the transaction. Options contracts only impose an obligation on one party.
According to the efficient market school, do the best job at predicting future spot exchange rates.