b) Consider the above concurrent schedule: R2(b) R2(a) W2(a) R3(a) W2(b) R3(b) R1(b) Wi(b)i.Is this concurrent schedule allowed under Two-Phase Locking (2PL) with isolation?ii.Is this concurrent schedule allowed under 2PL?Justify your answesr by adding (or failing to add) lock and unlock instructions that follow the locking protocol to theabove schedule. The timeline of the lock and unlock operations must be clearly indicated. A cell can have ATMOST 1 operation. There may be extra rows in the table provided.T1T2T3Time

2-PL ensures serializability. Let's see the following Schedule: T1 T2 T3 1 Lock-X(A) 2…

Answered: i. Is this concurrent schedule allowed…

i. Is this concurrent schedule allowed under Two-Phase Locking (2PL) with isolation? 11. Is this concurrent schedule allowed under 2PL?

Database System Concepts

7th Edition

ISBN:9780078022159

Author:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Publisher:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Chapter1: Introduction

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1PE

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

On page 4 Experience with Processes and Monitors in Mesa, Lampson and Redell state the following: "For mutual exclusion with a preemptive scheduler, it is necessary to introduce explicit locks, and machinery that makes requesting processes wait when a lock is unavailable. We considered casting our locks as semaphores, but decided that, compared with monitors, they exert too little structuring discipline on concurrent programs." How do semaphores "exert too little structuring discipline" and how is this remedied by monitors? Construct an example to show how the structuring discipline exerted by monitors could be useful.
Describe the deadlock scenario illustrated above based on your understanding. What do you think would happen if both Process P and Q need to get the same resource? Which concurrency mechanism would you suggest that might prevent the deadlock situation above? Rationalize your answer. Define in detail the Execution Paths 2 to 6. Example: Execution Path 1 – Process Q acquires Resource B and then Resource A. Process Q then releases Resource B and A, respectively.
12. In one of the deadlock prevention methods, impose a total ordering of all resource types, and require that each process requests resources in an increasing order of enumeration. This violates the _______________ condition of deadlock. a. Mutual exclusion b. Hold and Wait c. Circular Wait d. No Preemption
Process P0 and process P1 both want to access a shared datum, X, which is currently 0. P0 wants to add 2 to it, P1 wants to add 3 to it. Answer the following.a. Without synchronization, what value(s) can X result in?b. With synchronization, what value(s) can X result in?c. If another process, P2, was supposed to access X after P0 and P1 completed their stores, where P2 sets X to 5, would your answer to a or b change?
Please provide a detailed description of the phantom phenomenon. Why is it conceivable that this phenomenon will result in inappropriate concurrent execution notwithstanding the use of the two-phase locking technique?
For mutual exclusion with a preemptive scheduler, it is necessary to introduce explicit locks, and machinery that makes requesting processes wait when a lock is unavailable. We considered casting our locks as semaphores, but decided that, compared with monitors, they exert too little structuring discipline on concurrent programs." How do semaphores "exert too little structuring discipline" and how is this remedied by monitors? Construct an example to show how the structuring discipline exerted by monitors could be useful. Please dont post the answer which is already available on website, Also I need the answer for the montior exert on structuring of the program
For mutual exclusion with a preemptive scheduler, it is necessary to introduce explicit locks, and machinery that makes requesting processes wait when a lock is unavailable. We considered casting our locks as semaphores, but decided that, compared with monitors, they exert too little structuring discipline on concurrent programs." How do semaphores "exert too little structuring discipline" and how is this remedied by monitors? Construct an example to show how the structuring discipline exerted by monitors could be useful. Please write the code of the montior remedies for the structuring discipline exerted by monitor
For mutual exclusion with a preemptive scheduler, it is necessary to introduce explicit locks, and machinery that makes requesting processes wait when a lock is unavailable. We considered casting our locks as semaphores, but decided that, compared with monitors, they exert too little structuring discipline on concurrent programs." How do semaphores "exert too little structuring discipline" and how is this remedied by monitors? Construct an example to show how the structuring discipline exerted by monitors could be useful. Please explain in detail with code example for monitors structuring discipline >?
In deadlock avoidance, using banker’s algorithm, what would be the consequence(s) of (i): A process declaring its maximum need as maximum possible for each resource. In other words, if a resource A has 5 instances, then each process declares its maximum needs as 5. (ii): A process declaring its minimum needs as maximum needs. For example, a process may need 2-5 instances of resource A. but it declares its maximum need as 2.
Computer Science "For mutual exclusion with a preemptive scheduler, it is necessary to introduce explicit locks, and machinery that makes requesting processes wait when a lock is unavailable. We considered casting our locks as semaphores, but decided that, compared with monitors, they exert too little structuring discipline on concurrent programs." How do semaphores "exert too little structuring discipline" and how is this remedied by monitors? Construct an example to show how the structuring discipline exerted by monitors could be useful..
52. ……………. can be defined as the permanent blocking of a set of processed that either complete for system resources or communicate with each other. a. Deadlock b. Permanent lock c. Starvation d. Mutual exclusion
1.In the Readers-Writers problem, more than one writer can access the buffer at the same time to write True False 2.Given that processes P1 and P2 are using semaphores to lock resources, determine whether or not the following sequence of requests results in a deadlock. Initially, all resources are available. P1: P2: wait(A) wait(C) wait(B) wait(B) ... .... signal(A) signal(B) signal(B) signal(C) Yes No Insufficient information 3.If no process is executing in its critical section and there exist some processes that wish to enter their critical section, then the selection of the processes that will enter the critical section next cannot be postponed indefinitely. Which option describe best Mutual Exclusion Progress Bounded Waiting None of the above 4.In the producer-consumer problem, the "out" will be used to point to the index in the buffer where a producer can produce next. True False 5.Entry section and Exit section in the code together are referred to as a solution for…