In excercise 6 Find the inverse of the given matriu (pfft exists) using Theorem 3.8 6:11/√2. -1/2 -1/√2 1/√2

Linear Algebra: A Modern Introduction
4th Edition
ISBN:9781285463247
Author:David Poole
Publisher:David Poole
Chapter7: Distance And Approximation
Section7.4: The Singular Value Decomposition
Problem 51EQ
icon
Related questions
Question
100%
I have added theorem 3.8 as per the question
In excereße 6 Find the Pniverse of the
given matriu (pfft exists) using Theorem 3.8
6./1/√2.
-1/√2
1N2
1/√2
Transcribed Image Text:In excereße 6 Find the Pniverse of the given matriu (pfft exists) using Theorem 3.8 6./1/√2. -1/√2 1N2 1/√2
166
Theorem 3.8
Chapter 3 Matrices
If A =
and
b]
then A is invertible if ad-bc0, in which case
A¹ =
If ad bc= 0, then A is not invertible.
Similarly,
€ [a b]₁
The expression ad-bc is called the determinant of A, denoted det A. The formula
for the inverse of
(when it exists) is thus
times the matrix obtained by
det A
interchanging the entries on the main diagonal and changing the signs on the other
two entries. In addition to giving this formula, Theorem 3.8 says that a 2 x 2 matrix
A is invertible if and only if det A # 0. We will see in Chapter 4 that the determinant
can be defined for all square matrices and that this result remains true, although there
is no simple formula for the inverse of larger square matrices.
Proof Suppose that det A = ad-bc # Then
[a b][-d-d]=
ad-bc-c
[ad-bc ab + ba] [ad-bc
=
cd-de -cb + da
0
[-][a] =det A[i]
Since det A # 0, we can multiply both sides of each equation by 1/det A to obtain
[1-6]
-01-01
[Note that we have used property (d) of Theorem 3.3.] Thus, the matrix
1 d
det A-c
d
1
det A-c
satisfies the definition of an inverse, so A is invertible. Since the inverse of A is unique,
by Theorem 3.6, we must have
1
A = de
d -b
In the first case,
A = [a b]-[aca
[ac/a
Conversely, assume that ad
bc = 0. We will consider separately the cases where
a 0 and where a = 0. If a # 0, then d= bc/a, so the matrix can be written as
aw
-c
kaw
d-b
b
bc/a]
where k = c/a. In other words, the second row of A is a multiple of the first. Referring
to Example 3.23(b), we see that if A has an inverse
then
ka kb
and the corresponding system of linear equations
+ by
ky-61
+ kby
kax
0
ad - be] = det A[!]
= 1
+bz 0
= 0
+ kbz 1
has no solution. (Why?)
If a = 0, then ad bc = 0 implies that bc = 0, and therefore either b or c is 0.
Thus, A is of the form
о
[2] or [1]
d]
[oo]
• [[ ]]-[9]+[1]
have an inverse. (Verify this.)
Consequently, if ad-bc= 0, then A is not invertible.
Similarly,
2
cannot
Transcribed Image Text:166 Theorem 3.8 Chapter 3 Matrices If A = and b] then A is invertible if ad-bc0, in which case A¹ = If ad bc= 0, then A is not invertible. Similarly, € [a b]₁ The expression ad-bc is called the determinant of A, denoted det A. The formula for the inverse of (when it exists) is thus times the matrix obtained by det A interchanging the entries on the main diagonal and changing the signs on the other two entries. In addition to giving this formula, Theorem 3.8 says that a 2 x 2 matrix A is invertible if and only if det A # 0. We will see in Chapter 4 that the determinant can be defined for all square matrices and that this result remains true, although there is no simple formula for the inverse of larger square matrices. Proof Suppose that det A = ad-bc # Then [a b][-d-d]= ad-bc-c [ad-bc ab + ba] [ad-bc = cd-de -cb + da 0 [-][a] =det A[i] Since det A # 0, we can multiply both sides of each equation by 1/det A to obtain [1-6] -01-01 [Note that we have used property (d) of Theorem 3.3.] Thus, the matrix 1 d det A-c d 1 det A-c satisfies the definition of an inverse, so A is invertible. Since the inverse of A is unique, by Theorem 3.6, we must have 1 A = de d -b In the first case, A = [a b]-[aca [ac/a Conversely, assume that ad bc = 0. We will consider separately the cases where a 0 and where a = 0. If a # 0, then d= bc/a, so the matrix can be written as aw -c kaw d-b b bc/a] where k = c/a. In other words, the second row of A is a multiple of the first. Referring to Example 3.23(b), we see that if A has an inverse then ka kb and the corresponding system of linear equations + by ky-61 + kby kax 0 ad - be] = det A[!] = 1 +bz 0 = 0 + kbz 1 has no solution. (Why?) If a = 0, then ad bc = 0 implies that bc = 0, and therefore either b or c is 0. Thus, A is of the form о [2] or [1] d] [oo] • [[ ]]-[9]+[1] have an inverse. (Verify this.) Consequently, if ad-bc= 0, then A is not invertible. Similarly, 2 cannot
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps with 2 images

Blurred answer