In Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co., foreseeability was an issue. The question addressed by the court was: Group of answer choices Was it foreseeable to the plaintiff (Ms. Palsgraf) that the scales would fall? Was it foreseeable to Ms. Palsgraf that her injury would have been caused by an explosion? Was it foreseeable to the plaintiff (Ms. Palsgraf) that someone in the train station would be carrying explosive fireworks? Was it foreseeable to the passenger carrying the fireworks that they might explode and injure someone?
In Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co., foreseeability was an issue. The question addressed by the court was: Group of answer choices Was it foreseeable to the plaintiff (Ms. Palsgraf) that the scales would fall? Was it foreseeable to Ms. Palsgraf that her injury would have been caused by an explosion? Was it foreseeable to the plaintiff (Ms. Palsgraf) that someone in the train station would be carrying explosive fireworks? Was it foreseeable to the passenger carrying the fireworks that they might explode and injure someone?
Question
In Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co., foreseeability was an issue. The question addressed by the court was:
Group of answer choices
Was it foreseeable to the plaintiff (Ms. Palsgraf) that the scales would fall?
Was it foreseeable to Ms. Palsgraf that her injury would have been caused by an explosion?
Was it foreseeable to the plaintiff (Ms. Palsgraf) that someone in the train station would be carrying explosive fireworks?
Was it foreseeable to the passenger carrying the fireworks that they might explode and injure someone?
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps
