3. Emily, CPA, was engaged to review the unaudited. financial statements of Rooster Restaurants Inc., anonpublic company. During her review, Emily foundthat Rooster had not capitalized leases as required byGAAP. The result was so material, that Emily modifiedthe standard review report to state that "the financialstatements are not in conformity with GAAP."Is Emily's report in accordance with professionalstandards? If not, what should she have done underthe circumstances? Explain

Unaudited financial statements are those statements which has not been audited by the auditor and…

Answered: Is Emily's report in accordance with…

Is Emily's report in accordance with professional standards? If not, what should she have done under the circumstances? Explain

Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach to Conducting a Quality Audit

10th Edition

ISBN:9781305080577

Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. Rittenberg

Publisher:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. Rittenberg

Chapter15: Audit Reports On Financial Statements

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 25MCQ

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Mark Williams, CPA, was engaged by Jackson Financial Development Company to audit the financial statements of Apex Construction Company, a small closely held corporation. Williams was told when he was engaged that Jackson Financial needed reliable financial statements that would be used to determine whether to purchase a substantial amount of Apex Construction’s convertible debentures at the price asked by the estate of one of Apex’s former directors. Williams performed his audit in a negligent manner. As a result of his negligence, he failed to discover substantial defalcations by Carl Brown, the Apex controller. Jackson Financial purchased the debentures, but it would not have done so if the defalcations had been discovered. After discovery of the fraud, Jackson Financial promptly sold them for the highest price offered in the market at a $70,000 loss. If Apex Construction also sues Williams for negligence, what are the probable legal defenses Williams’s attorney would raise?…
Mark Williams, CPA, was engaged by Jackson Financial Development Company to audit the financial statements of Apex Construction Company, a small closely held corporation. Williams was told when he was engaged that Jackson Financial needed reliable financial statements that would be used to determine whether to purchase a substantial amount of Apex Construction’s convertible debentures at the price asked by the estate of one of Apex’s former directors. Williams performed his audit in a negligent manner. As a result of his negligence, he failed to discover substantial defalcations by Carl Brown, the Apex controller. Jackson Financial purchased the debentures, but it would not have done so if the defalcations had been discovered. After discovery of the fraud, Jackson Financial promptly sold them for the highest price offered in the market at a $70,000 loss. What liability does Williams have to Jackson Financial? Explain
Mark Williams, CPA, was engaged by Jackson Financial Development Company to audit the financial statements of Apex Construction Company, a small closely held corporation. Williams was told when he was engaged that Jackson Financial needed reliable financial statements that would be used to determine whether to purchase a substantial amount of Apex Construction’s convertible debentures at the price asked by the estate of one of Apex’s former directors. Williams performed his audit in a negligent manner. As a result of his negligence, he failed to discover substantial defalcations by Carl Brown, the Apex controller. Jackson Financial purchased the debentures, but it would not have done so if the defalcations had been discovered. After discovery of the fraud, Jackson Financial promptly sold them for the highest price offered in the market at a $70,000 loss. Will the negligence of Mark Williams, CPA, prevent him from recovering on a liability insurance policy covering the practice of…
Nixon & Co., CPAs, issued an unmodified opinion on the 2015 financial statements of Madison Corp. These financial statements were included in Madison’s annual report and Form 10-K filed with the SEC. Nixon did not detect material misstatements in the financial statements as a result of negligence in the performance of the audit. Based upon the financial statements, Harry Corp. purchased stock in Madison. Shortly thereafter, Madison became insolvent, causing the price of the stock to decline drastically. Harry has commenced legal action against Nixon for damages based upon Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. What would be Nixon’s best defense to such an action? Explain.
Harold, CPA, believes there is substantial doubt about the ability of Jersamtan Co. to continue as a going concern for a reasonable period of time. In evaluating Jersamtan's plans for dealing with the adverse effects of future conditions and events, Harold most likely would consider, as a mitigating factor, Jersamtan's plans to Discuss with lenders the terms of all debt and loan agreements. Postpone expenditures for research and development projects. Purchase production facilities currently being leased from a related party. Strengthen internal controls over cash disbursements.
Holly Hill Acres, Ltd., executed and delivered a promissory note and a purchase money mortgage to Rogers and Blythe. The note provided that it was secured by a mortgage on certain real estate and that the terms of that mortgage “are by this reference made a part hereof.” Rogers and Blythe then assigned the note to Charter Bank, and the bank sought to foreclose on the note and mortgage. Holly Hill Acres refused to pay, claiming that the note was not negotiable and therefore subject to the defense that Holly Hill Acres had been defrauded by Rogers and Blythe. a. Present the position that the note is a negotiable instrument. b. What is the position that the note is nonnegotiable? c. Is the note negotiable or nonnegotiable? Explain.
You are the lead partner overseeing the audit for Camo Ltd, a privately owned company. The completion of the audit report is pending for the income year 2020 and you have noted several situations with possible actions. The situations are as follows: 1. Camo Corporation carries its property, plant, and equipment accounts at current market values. Current market values exceed historical cost by a highly material amount, and the effects are pervasive throughout the financial statements. 2. Management of Camo Corporation refuses to allow you to observe, or make, any counts of inventory. The recorded book value of inventory is highly material. 3. You were unable to confirm accounts receivable with Camo’s customers. However, because of detailed sales and cash receipts records, you were able to perform reliable alternative audit procedures. 4. One week before the end of fieldwork, you discover that the audit manager on the Camo engagement owns a material amount of Camo’s common stock. 5.…
You are the lead partner overseeing the audit for Camo Ltd, a privately owned company. The completion of the audit report is pending for the income year 2020 and you have noted several situations with possible actions. The situations are as follows: 1. Camo Corporation carries its property, plant, and equipment accounts at current market values. Current market values exceed historical cost by a highly material amount, and the effects are pervasive throughout the financial statements. 2. Management of Camo Corporation refuses to allow you to observe, or make, any counts of inventory. The recorded book value of inventory is highly material. 3. You were unable to confirm accounts receivable with Camo’s customers. However, because of detailed sales and cash receipts records, you were able to perform reliable alternative audit procedures. 4. One week before the end of fieldwork, you discover that the audit manager on the Camo engagement owns a material amount of Camo’s common stock. 5.…
A group of investors sued Anderson, Olds, and Watershed, CPAs (AOW) for alleged damages suffered when the entity in which they held common stock went bankrupt. To avoidliability under the common law, AOW must demonstrate which of the following?a. The investors actually suffered a loss.b. The investors relied on the financial statements audited by AOW.c. The investors’ loss was a direct result of their reliance on the audited financial statements.d. The audit was conducted in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards andwith due professional care.
Analyze each of the following situations below and provide your assessment of the potential resolution of each scenario, including potential liability for the auditor or audit firm involved. Yasmeen CPA is a defendant in a lawsuit alleging that she should be held liable for gross negligence for a fraud involving the valuation of securities included in the financial statements of one of his clients. Yasmeen was uncertain how to establish a correct valuation for the securities and decided to rely on the price estimation supplied by management. A lawsuit has been filed against Elena CPA, charging here with constructive fraud in the audit of Broughton Company’s financial statements. Elena has examined all the audit documentation in his files and reviewed all relevant auditing standards. She is convinced that his audit fully complies with standards of the profession but is uncertain what he should use as his primary defense tactic. Canon Film filed for a bankruptcy in January 2012. A…
In comparison to the burden of proof required of plaintiffs in civil lawsuits against independent auditors under common law, section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934a. Is the same regarding plaintiffs’ need to prove damages or losses.b. Is the same regarding plaintiffs’ need to establish privity or a beneficiary relationshipwith auditors.c. Does not require that plaintiffs prove their reliance on materially misstated financialstatements.d. Does not require that plaintiffs prove that relying on the materially misstated financialstatements caused their losses.
HolmesWatson (HW) is considering what the effect would be of reporting its liabilities under IFRS rather than U.S. GAAP. The following facts apply: a. HW is defending against a lawsuit and believes it is virtually certain to lose in court. If it loses the lawsuit, management estimates it will need to pay a range of damages that falls between $5,000,000 and $10,000,000, with each amount in that range equally likely. b. HW is defending against another lawsuit that is identical to item (a), but the relevant losses will only occur far into the future. The present values of the endpoints of the range are $3,000,000 and $8,000,000, with the timing of cash flow somewhat uncertain. HW considers these effects of the time value of money to be material. c. HW is defending against another lawsuit for which management believes HW has a slightly worse than 50/50 chance of losing in court. If it loses the lawsuit, management estimates HW will need to pay a range of damages that falls between…