It was becoming clear to Swifty Corp's managers that the company's furnace was reaching the end of its useful life (a little sooner than they had hoped). There is a feasible option for an overhaul on the existing furnace, which would extend its useful life and not break the bank. Or the company could go all-in and just replace the old furnace with a more efficient model. Additional information for each option is as follows. 1 2 Overhaul existing furnace. Initial cost of $5,100; annual operating costs would be $12,000; expected life of 10 years with no salvage value. (a) Replace with new. Initial cost of $11,800; annual operating costs would be $9,320; under full warranty for 10 years with no expected salvage value. Swifty estimates an effective tax rate of 24% and typically requires at least a 4% rate of return. Click here to view the factor table Calculate the NPV of the overhaul option, keeping in mind that the current book value of the existing furnace is still $1,500. (Round present value factor calculations to 5 decimal places, eg. 1.25124 and final answer to 2 decimal places eg. 5,125.36. Enter negative amounts using either a negative sign preceding the number, eg -5,125.36 or parentheses, e.g. (5,125.36).) NPV $

It was becoming clear to Swifty Corp's managers that the company's furnace was reaching the end of its useful life (a little sooner than they had hoped). There is a feasible option for an overhaul on the existing furnace, which would extend its useful life and not break the bank. Or the company could go all-in and just replace the old furnace with a more efficient model. Additional information for each option is as follows. 1 2 Overhaul existing furnace. Initial cost of $5,100; annual operating costs would be $12,000; expected life of 10 years with no salvage value. (a) Replace with new. Initial cost of $11,800; annual operating costs would be $9,320; under full warranty for 10 years with no expected salvage value. Swifty estimates an effective tax rate of 24% and typically requires at least a 4% rate of return. Click here to view the factor table Calculate the NPV of the overhaul option, keeping in mind that the current book value of the existing furnace is still $1,500. (Round present value factor calculations to 5 decimal places, eg. 1.25124 and final answer to 2 decimal places eg. 5,125.36. Enter negative amounts using either a negative sign preceding the number, eg -5,125.36 or parentheses, e.g. (5,125.36).) NPV $

Intermediate Financial Management (MindTap Course List)

13th Edition

ISBN:9781337395083

Author:Eugene F. Brigham, Phillip R. Daves

Publisher:Eugene F. Brigham, Phillip R. Daves

Chapter12: Capital Budgeting: Decision Criteria

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 20P: The Aubey Coffee Company is evaluating the within-plant distribution system for its new roasting,...

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

The Aubey Coffee Company is evaluating the within-plant distribution system for its new roasting, grinding, and packing plant. The two alternatives are (1) a conveyor system with a high initial cost but low annual operating costs and (2) several forklift trucks, which cost less but have considerably higher operating costs. The decision to construct the plant has already been made, and the choice here will have no effect on the overall revenues of the project. The cost of capital for the plant is 8%, and the projects’ expected net costs are listed in the following table: What is the IRR of each alternative? What is the present value of the costs of each alternative? Which method should be chosen?
Newmarge Products Inc. is evaluating a new design for one of its manufacturing processes. The new design will eliminate the production of a toxic solid residue. The initial cost of the system is estimated at 860,000 and includes computerized equipment, software, and installation. There is no expected salvage value. The new system has a useful life of 8 years and is projected to produce cash operating savings of 225,000 per year over the old system (reducing labor costs and costs of processing and disposing of toxic waste). The cost of capital is 16%. Required: 1. Compute the NPV of the new system. 2. One year after implementation, the internal audit staff noted the following about the new system: (1) the cost of acquiring the system was 60,000 more than expected due to higher installation costs, and (2) the annual cost savings were 20,000 less than expected because more labor cost was needed than anticipated. Using the changes in expected costs and benefits, compute the NPV as if this information had been available one year ago. Did the company make the right decision? 3. CONCEPTUAL CONNECTION Upon reporting the results mentioned in the postaudit, the marketing manager responded in a memo to the internal audit department indicating that cash inflows also had increased by a net of 60,000 per year because of increased purchases by environmentally sensitive customers. Describe the effect that this has on the analysis in Requirement 2. 4. CONCEPTUAL CONNECTION Why is a postaudit beneficial to a firm?
A small company that manufactures vibration isolation platforms is trying to decide whether itshould replace the current assembly system (D), which is rather labor intensive, at present or 1 yearfrom now with a system that is more automated (C). Some components of the current system can besold immediately for $9,500, but they will be worthless hereafter. The operating cost of the existingsystem is $161,000 per year. System C will cost $310,000with a $50,000 salvage value after 4 years.Its operating cost will be $65,000 per year. If you are told to do a replacement analysis using aninterest rate of8% per year, which system would you recommend?
Jonathan Butler, process engineer, knows that the acceptance of a new process design will depend on its economic feasibility. The new process is designed to improve environmental performance. On the negative side, the process design requires new equipment and an infusion of working capital. The equipment will cost $1,200,000, and its cash operating expenses will total $270,000 per year. The equipment will last for 7 years but will need a major overhaul costing $120,000 at the end of the fifth year. At the end of 7 years, the equipment will be sold for $96,000. An increase in working capital totaling $120,000 will also be needed at the beginning. This will be recovered at the end of the 7 years. On the positive side, Jonathan estimates that the new process will save $400,000 per year in environmental costs (fines and cleanup costs avoided). The cost of capital is 12%. PRESENT VALUE YEAR 7 = ???
A small company that manufactures vibration isolation platforms is trying to decide whether it should immediately upgrade the current assemblysystem D, which is rather labor-intensive, with the more highly automated system C one year from now. Some components of the current system canbe sold now for $9000, but they will be worthless hereafter. The operating cost of the existing system is $192,000 per year. System C will cost $320,000 with a $50,000 salvage value after four years. Its operating cost will be $68,000 per year. If you are told to do a replacement analysis using an interest rate of 10% per year, which system do you recommend?
The Aubey Coffee Company is evaluating the within-plant distribution system for its new roasting, grinding, and packing plant. The two alternatives are (1) a conveyor system with a high initial cost but low annual operating costs and (2) several forklift trucks, which cost less but have considerably higher operating costs. The decision to construct the plant has already been made, and the choice here will have no effect on the overall revenues of the project. The cost of capital for the plant is 7%, and the projects' expected net costs are listed in the following table: Expected Net Cost Year Conveyor Forklift 0 -$500,000 -$200,000 1 -120,000 -160,000 2 -120,000 -160,000 3 -120,000 -160,000 4 -120,000 -160,000 5 -20,000 -160,000 What is the IRR of each alternative? The IRR of alternative 1 is -Select-undefined 5% 7% 9% Item 1 . The IRR of…
The Greenleaf Company is considering purchasing a new set of air-electric quill units to replacean obsolete one. The machine currently being usedfor the operation has a market value of zero. However, it is in good working order, and it will last for atleast an additional five years. The new quill units willperform the operation with so much more efficiencythat the firm’s engineers estimate that labor, material,and other direct costs will be reduced $3,000 a year ifthe units are installed. The new set of quill units costs$10,000 delivered and installed, and its economic lifeis estimated to be five years with zero salvage value.The firm’s MARR is 13%.(a) What investment is required to keep the oldmachine?(b) Compute the cash flow to use in the analysis foreach option.
Heffron Technologies (HT) is considering the introduction of a new product. The code name of the new product is COSA. This new product will require the installation of new plant, which is estimated to cost $500,000. The company is to install the new plant in a factory site that the company acquired one year ago for $600,000, prices have increased dramatically in the area, increasing by 20% over the year. The factory was acquired before the new product was considered and was thought to be a good buy. The factory has been empty for the past year. In addition to the cost of plant, HT will require $300,000 in net working capital to start. The additional net working capital will be recovered in full at the end of the project’s life. HT estimates that sales revenue for the new product will be $700,000 a year for the five-year life of the product. The cash operating costs are expected to be $360,000 a year and include cost of goods sold. HT will use the straight-line method to…
Heffron Technologies (HT) is considering the introduction of a new product. The code name of the new product is COSA. This new product will require the installation of new plant, which is estimated to cost $500,000. The company is to install the new plant in a factory site that the company acquired one year ago for $600,000, prices have increased dramatically in the area, increasing by 20% over the year. The factory was acquired before the new product was considered and was thought to be a good buy. The factory has been empty for the past year. In addition to the cost of plant, HT will require $300,000 in net working capital to start. The additional net working capital will be recovered in full at the end of the project’s life. HT estimates that sales revenue for the new product will be $700,000 a year for the five-year life of the product. The cash operating costs are expected to be $360,000 a year and include cost of goods sold. HT will use the straight-line method to…
Stockton Manufacturing Limited found out that after using only 2 years a machine for semi automation process, a more advanced model is now available in the market. This more advanced model will produce more output with greater efficiency as compare to existing machine. The cost of existing machine is $32,000 with life of 10 years, at the end of which it can be scrapped. The current market value of machine is $15,000 and there is a prospective buyer available to purchase it. The advanced model cost $123,500 with a useful life of 8 years and a scrap value of $20,500 at the end of life. The comparison of the two machines is as follows: EXISTING MACHINE ADVANCED MODEL CAPACITY PER ANNUM 200,000 UNITS 230,000 UNITS SALE PRICE PER UNIT ($) 0.95 0.95 LABOR COST PER UNIT ($) 0.12 0.08 MATERIAL COST PER UNIT ($) 0.48 0.46 FIXED OVERHEADS (ALLOCATION OF PORTION OF COMPANY’S FIXED OVERHEADS) ($) 0.24 0.16 The sales director is of the opinion…
Bailey, Inc., is considering buying a new gang punch that would allow circuit boards to be produced more efficiently. The punch has a first cost of $100,000 and a useful life of 15 years. At the end of its useful life, the punch has no salvage value. Annual labor costs would increase $2,000 using the gang punch, but annual raw material costs would decrease $12,000. MARR is 5%/year. assuming that floor support and vibration dampening must be added for the gang punch. These one-time first costs are estimated to be $35,000. a. What is the present worth of this investment? b. What is the decision rule for judging the attractiveness of investments based on present worth? c. Should Bailey buy the gang punch?
Your company has been approached to bid on a contract to sell 21,000 voice recognition (VR) computer keyboards per year for four years. Due to technological improvements, beyond that time they will be outdated and no sales will be possible. The equipment necessary for the production will cost $4,200,000 and will be depreciated on a straight-line basis to a zero salvage value. Production will require an investment in net working capital of $150,000 to be returned at the end of the project, and the equipment can be sold for $270,000 at the end of production. Fixed costs are $805,000 per year and variable costs are $45 per unit. In addition to the contract, you feel your company can sell 4,800, 12,400, 14,400, and 7,700 additional units to companies in other countries over the next four years, respectively, at a price of $130. This price is fixed. The tax rate is 25 percent, and the required return is 11 percent. Additionally, the president of the company will undertake the project only…