Jump to level 1valsTable: oEmpty-since-startEmpty-after-removal2Occupied3 27Hash table valsTable uses quadratic probing, a hash function ofkey % 11, c1 = 1, and c2 = 1.45 4972How many buckets does HashSearch(vals Table, 27) probe?Ex: 9 :629How many buckets does Hashlnsert(valsTable, item 27) probe?8.10

Given that, The hash function is Key%11 c1=1 and c2=1 Quadratic probing is a type of Linear…

Jump to level 1 valsTable: o JEmpty-since-start Empty-after-removal |Occupied 3 27 Hash table valsTable uses quadratic probing, a hash function of key % 11, c1 = 1, and c2 = 1. 5 49 6 72 How many buckets does HashSearch(valsTable, 27) probe? Ex: 9 29 How many buckets does Hashlnsert(valsTable, item 27) probe? 8 10 1, 2. 4. 9.

Jump to level 1 valsTable: o JEmpty-since-start Empty-after-removal |Occupied 3 27 Hash table valsTable uses quadratic probing, a hash function of key % 11, c1 = 1, and c2 = 1. 5 49 6 72 How many buckets does HashSearch(valsTable, 27) probe? Ex: 9 29 How many buckets does Hashlnsert(valsTable, item 27) probe? 8 10 1, 2. 4. 9.

Database System Concepts

7th Edition

ISBN:9780078022159

Author:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Publisher:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Chapter1: Introduction

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1PE

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

We have a poorly-designed hash map in which all of the stored values are contained inside a single bucket (i.e., they are all contained within a single LinkedList). Explain why this is detrimental to the benefits of using a hash map.
Is there a predetermined limit to the number of linked lists that may be included inside a hash table of size m? Hash functions continue to baffle me, and I have no idea how to interpret their intended use. Give an example to explain the point you're making.
We have a poorly-designed hash map where all of the stored values are in one bucket (meaning they’re all in one LinkedList). Explain why this undermines the advantages of a hash map.
You should consider the following when creating an open hash table with good functionality:
Does a hashing of size m always contain the same number of linked lists? Hash functions make no sense to me at all. Provide an illustration to back up your claims.
Suppose there are seven students with IDs 5701, 9302, 4210, 9015, 1553, 9902, and 2104. Suppose hash table, HT, is of the size 19, indexed 0,1,2, . . ., 18. Show how these students’ IDs, in the order given, are inserted in HT using the hashing function h(k) = k % 19. Use double hashing to resolve collision, where the second hash function is given by g(k) = (k+1) % 17.
Is there a certain number of linked lists that are always included inside a hash table of size m? To save my life, please explain what the purpose of a hash function is since I have not the faintest clue. Provide an example to support your idea.
Given values below: 66 47 87 900 126 140 145 500 177 285 393 395 467 566 620 735 Store the values into a hash table with ten buckets, each containing three slots. If a bucket is full, use the next (sequential) bucket that contains a free slot. And Store the values into a hash table that uses the hash function key % 10 to determine into which of ten chains (separate chaining) to put the value?
Show the result when we insert the keys 5; 28; 19; 15; 20; 33; 12; 17; 10 into a hash table with collisions resolved by linked list at each slot. Let the hash table have 9 slots, and let the hash function be h(x) = (2x+1) mod 9. (You are expected to draw the final hash table)
The 9-entry hash table that results from using the hash function, h(i) = (2i+7) mod 9, to hash the keys 12, 5, 13, 4, 10, 19, 8, 3, and 28, assuming collisions are handled by linear probing as follows: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 10 19 3 28 12 8 13 4 5 group answer choice a) True b) False
We have a poorly designed hash map in which all values have been placed in the same bucket (that is, they are all in the same LinkedList). Explain how this goes against the purpose of utilizing a hash map in the first place.
Suppose we have a hash table of size 11 and use the hash function h(key) = (key + i2) % 11, where i = 0, 12, 22, ..., 102. After inserting entries with keys 35, 29, 54, 43, 121, 33, 44, and 187. What is the index of key 187? index = {0, 1, 2, ..., 10}