Kate and her brother Rustin own a piece of property in Dallas as tenants in common valued at $50,000. Kate owns a 75% interest and Rustin owns a 25% interest. During Mardi Gras, Rustin went down to New Orleans and decided he loved it there. The next week he purchased a house on St. Charles Avenue right across from the Mardi Gras parade route. Unfortunately, Rustin did not get an appraisal and learned later that he significantly overpaid for the property. In addition, the home was much too expensive for Rustin and shortly after the purchase Rustin defaulted on the loan. Even after the bank seized the home, there was a $50,000 debt remaining. Assuming the bank received a default judgment against Rustin and could seize the Dallas property, what portion of the property could be seized to satisfy Rustin's debt? 1.0%. 2. 25%. 3. 50%. 4. 100%. 0%. 25%.

CONCEPTS IN FED.TAX.,2020-W/ACCESS
20th Edition
ISBN:9780357110362
Author:Murphy
Publisher:Murphy
Chapter9: Acquisitions Of Property
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 63P
icon
Related questions
Question

Sub : Finance
Pls answer  very fast.I ll upvote. Thank You

Kate and her brother Rustin own a piece of property in Dallas as tenants in common
valued at $50,000. Kate owns a 75% interest and Rustin owns a 25% interest. During
Mardi Gras, Rustin went down to New Orleans and decided he loved it there. The next
week he purchased a house on St. Charles Avenue right across from the Mardi Gras
parade route. Unfortunately, Rustin did not get an appraisal and learned later that he
significantly overpaid for the property. In addition, the home was much too expensive
for Rustin and shortly after the purchase Rustin defaulted on the loan. Even after the
bank seized the home, there was a $50,000 debt remaining. Assuming the bank
received a default judgment against Rustin and could seize the Dallas property, what
portion of the property could be seized to satisfy Rustin's debt?
1. 0%.
2.25%.
3. 50%.
4. 100%.
0%.
25%.
50%.
100%.
Transcribed Image Text:Kate and her brother Rustin own a piece of property in Dallas as tenants in common valued at $50,000. Kate owns a 75% interest and Rustin owns a 25% interest. During Mardi Gras, Rustin went down to New Orleans and decided he loved it there. The next week he purchased a house on St. Charles Avenue right across from the Mardi Gras parade route. Unfortunately, Rustin did not get an appraisal and learned later that he significantly overpaid for the property. In addition, the home was much too expensive for Rustin and shortly after the purchase Rustin defaulted on the loan. Even after the bank seized the home, there was a $50,000 debt remaining. Assuming the bank received a default judgment against Rustin and could seize the Dallas property, what portion of the property could be seized to satisfy Rustin's debt? 1. 0%. 2.25%. 3. 50%. 4. 100%. 0%. 25%. 50%. 100%.
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 4 steps

Blurred answer
Recommended textbooks for you
CONCEPTS IN FED.TAX., 2020-W/ACCESS
CONCEPTS IN FED.TAX., 2020-W/ACCESS
Accounting
ISBN:
9780357110362
Author:
Murphy
Publisher:
CENGAGE L
SWFT Comprehensive Vol 2020
SWFT Comprehensive Vol 2020
Accounting
ISBN:
9780357391723
Author:
Maloney
Publisher:
Cengage
SWFT Comprehensive Volume 2019
SWFT Comprehensive Volume 2019
Accounting
ISBN:
9780357233306
Author:
Maloney
Publisher:
Cengage
SWFT Corp Partner Estates Trusts
SWFT Corp Partner Estates Trusts
Accounting
ISBN:
9780357161548
Author:
Raabe
Publisher:
Cengage
SWFT Individual Income Taxes
SWFT Individual Income Taxes
Accounting
ISBN:
9780357391365
Author:
YOUNG
Publisher:
Cengage
Individual Income Taxes
Individual Income Taxes
Accounting
ISBN:
9780357109731
Author:
Hoffman
Publisher:
CENGAGE LEARNING - CONSIGNMENT