Let A ⊆ R be nonempty and bounded above, and let S be the union of all A ∈ A. (a) First, prove that S ∈ R by showing that it is a cut. (b) Now, show that S is the least upper bound for A. This finishes the proof that R is complete. Notice that we could have proved that least upper bounds exist immediately after defining the ordering on R, but saving it for last gives it the privileged place in the argument it deserves. There is, however, still one loose end to sew up. The statement of Theorem 8.6.1 mentions that our complete ordered field contains Q as a subfield. This is a slight abuse of language. What it should say is that R contains a subfield that looks and acts exactly like Q.
Let A ⊆ R be nonempty and bounded above, and let S be the union of all A ∈ A. (a) First, prove that S ∈ R by showing that it is a cut. (b) Now, show that S is the least upper bound for A. This finishes the proof that R is complete. Notice that we could have proved that least upper bounds exist immediately after defining the ordering on R, but saving it for last gives it the privileged place in the argument it deserves. There is, however, still one loose end to sew up. The statement of Theorem 8.6.1 mentions that our complete ordered field contains Q as a subfield. This is a slight abuse of language. What it should say is that R contains a subfield that looks and acts exactly like Q.
Elements Of Modern Algebra
8th Edition
ISBN:9781285463230
Author:Gilbert, Linda, Jimmie
Publisher:Gilbert, Linda, Jimmie
Chapter1: Fundamentals
Section1.7: Relations
Problem 29E: 29. Suppose , , represents a partition of the nonempty set A. Define R on A by if and only if there...
Related questions
Question
Let A ⊆ R be nonempty and bounded above, and let S be the union of all A ∈ A. (a) First, prove that S ∈ R by showing that it is a cut. (b) Now, show that S is the least upper bound for A. This finishes the proof that R is complete. Notice that we could have proved that least upper bounds exist immediately after defining the ordering on R, but saving it for last gives it the privileged place in the argument it deserves. There is, however, still one loose end to sew up. The statement of Theorem 8.6.1 mentions that our complete ordered field contains Q as a subfield. This is a slight abuse of language. What it should say is that R contains a subfield that looks and acts exactly like Q.
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step by step
Solved in 3 steps
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, advanced-math and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Recommended textbooks for you
Elements Of Modern Algebra
Algebra
ISBN:
9781285463230
Author:
Gilbert, Linda, Jimmie
Publisher:
Cengage Learning,
Linear Algebra: A Modern Introduction
Algebra
ISBN:
9781285463247
Author:
David Poole
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elements Of Modern Algebra
Algebra
ISBN:
9781285463230
Author:
Gilbert, Linda, Jimmie
Publisher:
Cengage Learning,
Linear Algebra: A Modern Introduction
Algebra
ISBN:
9781285463247
Author:
David Poole
Publisher:
Cengage Learning