Let FA1 accept L₁ and let FA2 accept L2. Briefly describe an effective procedure that can be used to decide whether the two given FA's accept the same language (i.e. whether L₁ and L2 are equivalent.) Apply the blue paint procedure to determine whether or not the following FA accepts any words (show all the steps): a b a a b a

Let FA1 accept L₁ and let FA2 accept L2. Briefly describe an effective procedure that can be used to decide whether the two given FA's accept the same language (i.e. whether L₁ and L2 are equivalent.) Apply the blue paint procedure to determine whether or not the following FA accepts any words (show all the steps): a b a a b a

Database System Concepts

7th Edition

ISBN:9780078022159

Author:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Publisher:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Chapter1: Introduction

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1PE

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Write the following English statements using the following predicates, anyneeded logical operators, and quantifiers if needed. Assume the domain of x is all students and thedomain of y is all states in US.B(x, y): Person x has been to state y. L(x, y): Person x likes state y. a. No one has been to every state in US.d. Alice has been to every state that Bob has been to.e. There is no state that both Alice and Bob have been to.
This exercise uses the function MapColor and predicates In(x,y), Borders(x,y), and Country(x), whose arguments are geographical regions, along with constant symbols for various regions. In each of the following we give an English sentence and a number of candidate logical expressions. For each of the logical expressions, state whether it (1) correctly expresses the English sentence; (2) is syntactically invalid and therefore meaningless; or (3) is syntactically valid but does not express the meaning of the English sentence.1. Paris and Marseilles are both in France.1. In(Paris∧Marseilles,France).2. In(Paris,France)∧In(Marseilles,France).3. In(Paris,France)∨In(Marseilles,France).2. There is a country that borders both Iraq and Pakistan.1. ∃c Country(c)∧Border(c,Iraq)∧Border(c,Pakistan).2. ∃c Country(c)⇒[Border(c,Iraq)∧Border(c,Pakistan)].3. [∃c Country(c)]⇒[Border(c,Iraq)∧Border(c,Pakistan)].4. ∃c Border(Country(c),Iraq∧Pakistan).3. All countries that border Ecuador are in South…
Consider the following true propositions:• p : The applicant has passed the learner permit test.• q : The applicant has passed the road test.• r : The applicant is allowed a driver’s license.For each of the following sentences write,symbolically, the compound proposition that correspondstothe given sentence in English asit is written (do not change the order or form of the expression).a) The applicant did not pass the road test but passed the learner permit test.b) If the applicant passes the learner permit test and the road test, then the applicant is allowed adriver’s license.c) Passing the learner permit test and the road test are necessary for being allowed a driver’slicense.d) The applicant passed either the learner permit test or the road test, but not both.e) It is not true that the applicant does not pass the road test and is allowed a driver’s license.
Using the following predicates, any needed logical operators, and quantifiers if needed, translate the following English statements . Assume the domain of x is all students and thedomain of y is all states in US.B(x, y): Person x has been to state y. L(x, y): Person x likes state y. a. No one has been to every state in US.d. Alice has been to every state that Bob has been to.e. There is no state that both Alice and Bob have been to.
Let P(x) be the statement “x can speak Russian” and let Q(x) be the statement “x knows C++”. Express each of these statements in terms P(x), Q(x), quantifiers and logical connectives. The domain for quantifiers consists of all students at Mines. There is a student at Mines who can speak Russian and who knows C++. Every student at your school either can speak Russian or knows C++.
2) (L2) Prove using laws of logic that the conditional proposition (p ∧ q) → r is equivalent to (p ∧ ¬ r) →¬ q. 3) (L3) Show that the converse of a conditional proposition p: q → r is equivalent to the inverse of proposition p using a truth table. 4.1) (L4) Show whether ((p ∧ (p→q)) ↔ ¬p) is a tautology or not. Use a truth table and be specific about which row(s)/column(s) of the truth table justify your answer. 4.2) (L4) Give truth values for the propositional variables that cause the two expressions to have different truth values. For example, given p ∨ q and p ⊕ q, the correct answer would be p = q = T, because when p and q are both true, p ∨ q is true but p ⊕ q is false. Note that there may be more than one correct answer. r ∧ (p ∨ q) (r ∧ p) ∨ q
1. In transforming a formula into an equivalent CNF, you can use the absorption laws to eliminate conjunctions within disjuntions, i.e. expressions such as p ˅ (q ˄ r) and (p ˄ q) ˅ r. True False 2. Let p, q, and r be propositional variables. Which of the following expressions would NOT be formulas in conjunctive normal form? (p ˄ ¬q) ˅ (¬r ˄ q ˄ p) ¬q p ˅ q ˅ ¬p p ˄ ¬p 3. Consider the propositional logic formula (p ˄ q) ˅ (r ˅ ¬s) From the options below, which one is the equivalent CNF? To determine the correct answer, transform the formula above into CNF using the steps learnt in this module. (p ˅ r ˅ s) ˄ (q ˅ r ˅ ¬s) (¬p ∨ r ∨ s) ∧ (¬q ∨ ¬r ∨ ¬s) (p ˅ r ˅ ¬s) ˄ (q ˅ r ˅ s) (p ˅ r ˅ ¬s) ˄ (q ˅ r ˅ ¬s)…
Draw a deterministic FSM that recognizes strings of 1’s and 0’s specified by each of the following criteria. Each FSM should reject any characters that are not 0 or 1. *(a) The string of three characters, 101. (b) All strings of arbitrary length that end in 101. For example, the FSM should accept 1101 but reject 1011. (c) All strings of arbitrary length that begin with 101. For example, the FSM should accept 1010 but reject 0101. (d) All strings of arbitrary length that contain a 101 at least once anywhere. For example, the FSM should accept all the strings mentioned in parts (a), (b), and (c), as well as strings such as 11100001011111100111.
Determine whether the following proposition is a tautology: (¬p∨¬(r⟶q))⟷(p⟶(¬q∧r)) can i get a non handwriting answer so it would be easy to copy please
Let ∑ = {a, b}. Solve the following questions: Given a regular expression r=(bb^* a+aa^* b)^*, find an NFA to accept the language L(r).
Part 1: Proof-Theoretic Concepts Show that each of the following pairs of sentences are provably equivalent in SL J → F, ¬(J ∧ ¬F)
Redundant Inequalities:prove statementLet e1, e2 be two symbolic expressions defined in V ∪P and q ∈ V ∪P.c1, c2 are two inequalities of I such that c1 is defined by e1 REL q and c2 by e2 REL q. REL is an inequality relationship in {≤, <}. Then c2 can be eliminated from I, iff low(e1 − e2) ≥ 0.