Let {fn}%=1 be a sequence of continous functions on an interval [a, b]. If {fn}-1 converges uniformly to a function f on [a, b], then f is continous on [a, b]. (a) (i) Discuss the convergence of the sequence of functions fn, when fn(x) 1+ æn' where x E [0, 1). 1 (ii) Show that the sequence {fn}, where fn(x) is not uniformly convergent 1+ xn on x € [0, 1]. x2n (b) Let fn(x) = is not uniform. 14 g2n X E [0, 1]. Use the above theorem to show that the convergence (c) Is the converse of the above theorem necessary true? Justify your answer using the sequence fn(x) = nxe¬nª, x E [0, 1].

Algebra & Trigonometry with Analytic Geometry
13th Edition
ISBN:9781133382119
Author:Swokowski
Publisher:Swokowski
Chapter10: Sequences, Series, And Probability
Section10.2: Arithmetic Sequences
Problem 68E
icon
Related questions
Question

Can I have a detailed, step-by-step explanation for part (a) of the the following question?

Please indicate the relevant reasoning or assumptions you made, during simplications and calculations.

Thank you very much!

 

 

Let {fn}1 be a sequence of continous functions on an interval [a, b]. If {fn}1 converges
uniformly to a function f on [a, b], then f is continous on [a, b].
(a) (i) Discuss the convergence of the sequence of functions fn, when fn(x)
1+ xn
where r E [0, 1].
(ii) Show that the sequence {fn}, where fn(x) =
1
is not uniformly convergent
1+ xn
on r E (0, 1].
(b) Let fn(x) =
is not uniform.
14 „2n X E [0, 1]. Use the above theorem to show that the convergence
(c) Is the converse of the above theorem necessary true? Justify your answer using the
sequence fn(x) = nxe-n, x E [0, 1].
Transcribed Image Text:Let {fn}1 be a sequence of continous functions on an interval [a, b]. If {fn}1 converges uniformly to a function f on [a, b], then f is continous on [a, b]. (a) (i) Discuss the convergence of the sequence of functions fn, when fn(x) 1+ xn where r E [0, 1]. (ii) Show that the sequence {fn}, where fn(x) = 1 is not uniformly convergent 1+ xn on r E (0, 1]. (b) Let fn(x) = is not uniform. 14 „2n X E [0, 1]. Use the above theorem to show that the convergence (c) Is the converse of the above theorem necessary true? Justify your answer using the sequence fn(x) = nxe-n, x E [0, 1].
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Perimeter
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, advanced-math and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Algebra & Trigonometry with Analytic Geometry
Algebra & Trigonometry with Analytic Geometry
Algebra
ISBN:
9781133382119
Author:
Swokowski
Publisher:
Cengage