Let G be a context free grammar where (G-((S, A, B, C),(a, b, d), P, S) with the productions in P given below AaA 6 S- ABAC B b je Cd (E denotes the null string). Transform the grammar G to an equivalent context-free grammar G' that has no e productions and no unit productions (A unit production is of the form x y, X and y are non teminals).

Let G be a context free grammar where (G-((S, A, B, C),(a, b, d), P, S) with the productions in P given below AaA 6 S- ABAC B b je Cd (E denotes the null string). Transform the grammar G to an equivalent context-free grammar G' that has no e productions and no unit productions (A unit production is of the form x y, X and y are non teminals).

Database System Concepts

7th Edition

ISBN:9780078022159

Author:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Publisher:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Chapter1: Introduction

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1PE

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Question 2-Context-free Grammars Consider the alphabet = {A, V., (,), x, y, z) and the following grammar G = (V,E, R, F), defined by the rules: F (FAF) | (FVF) | (F) | P (a) Identify the set of variables and the set of terminal symbols of G. (b) Identify three words (of lengths between 10 and 20) that can be generated by the above grammar and show their derivations. (c) Consider a modified grammar G', where we remove the brackets '(' and ')' from the alphabet and the derivation rules. That is we set Σ'= {A, V., x, y, z) and we remove all occurrences of brackets in the derivation rules. Show that there are words that are derived ambiguously in G'
For each of these languages, give both a context-free grammar and a push down automaton. Briefly explain how your CFG and PDA work. Your CFG should be relatively simple and contain at most 6 variables. For this question, your PDA cannot be directly convertedfrom your CFG (a)L1={ x#y | x is a prefix of yR, and y∈{a,b}* } ,Σ ={a,b,#} Recall that wR is w written backwards, and u is a prefix of v if v=ut for some stringt.For example bb#abb is in L1, but a#ab is not. (b)L2={ aibjck | i ≥ j or j ≥ k } (c)L3 = {w∈{a,b}* | w contains an unequal number of a’s and b’s}
Give a context free grammar G accepting the same language as FSA A of question 1, question 1 shown in the pjotograph .
Consider the grammar G = (V, T, E, P) with V = {E, I}, T = {a, b, c, +, *, (, ) }, and productionsE⟶⟶ I |E + E |E * E |(E) I ⟶⟶ a | b | cThe grammar is _________. Group of answer choices: A)ambiguous B)unambiguous
Question 3 a) Consider the grammar E → E + E | E ∗ E | (E) | id. I. Change ambiguous grammar to non-ambiguous? II. Give a context-free grammar for generating the set of palindromes over the alphabet a,b. III. Give a context-free grammar for generating all strings over a,b such that | a |= 2∗ | b
Consider the following context-free grammar defined by the tuple G and by the rules that appear in the image. a) Show that no string in L (G) contains "ba" as a substring. It is suggested to proceed by induction over the length of the chain. b) Informally describe L (G). Justify your answer using a). (Remember that the symbol | is disjunctive, and is used in this case to compactly represent four rules.)
Question 13) Consider the following context-free grammar G over the alphabet Σ = {a, b, c}, where S is thestart variable:S → aSb | ε | acSbaUsing the rules of the grammar G, give a derivation for the word acabba.
Consider the following Grammar E → E + E E → E - E E → id Check whether the given grammar is ambiguous or not using left most derivation and right most derivation with Parse Tree?
Consider the grammar:S →aAbB | CCA →a | CB | εB →bB | dC →aC | d | ε where S, A, B, and C are non-terminals, S is the start variable, and a, b, c, and d are terminals. Does the grammar have a predictive recursive descent parser? If the grammar has a predictive recursive descent parser, show that the conditions of predictive parsing apply for every non-terminal. On the other hand, if the grammar does not have a predictive recursive descent parser, then show ALL the conditions of predictive parsing that fail.
Give a grammar and accepter for such et of identifiers. And also define the production rule by starting S->
Construct, in each case, a DFA/NFA that recognises L(G), where G is a regular grammar with productions (a) S _→ b|aS|aA, A _→ a|aA|bS. (b) S _→ aS|bS|aA, A _→ bB, B _→ aC, C _→ ε. Design NFAs and DFAs that accept the following languages: (a) a+ ∪ b∗a∗ . (b) aa∗(a ∪ b). (c) (a ∪ bb)∗(ba∗ ∪ ε). (d) (ab∗aa ∪ bba∗ab). (e) Complement of (ab ∗ aa ∪ bba∗ab). (f) (aa∗ ∪ aba∗b∗). (g) (a ∪ b)∗b(a ∪ bb)∗ . (h) (abab)∗ ∪ (aaa∗ ∪ b∗). (i) ((aa∗)∗b)∗ . (j) (ab∗a∗) ∪ ((ab)∗ba). (k) (ab∗a∗) ∩ ((ab)∗ba). (l) (a ∪ b)a∗ ∩ baa∗ . (m) (aa ∪ bb)∗(ab ∪ ba)(aa ∪ bb)∗ . (n) (aaa)∗b ∪ (aa)∗b. (o) (a(ab)∗(aa ∪ b) ∪ b(ba)∗(a ∪ bb))∗ .
Let's consider a grammar for expressions is defined as follows.<assign> -> <id> = <expr><id> -> A | B | C | D<expr> -> <id> + <expr> | <id> * <expr> | ( <expr> ) | <id>1. Is this grammar unambiguous? Can you explain in detail?2. How can I design a PDA (PushDown Automata) M that recognizes the BNF (i.e. a metasyntax notation for CFG)?