Let's say you wish to prevent a hash function clash from being discovered by an attacker. The attacker has the computing power enough to produce 240 hash values. Aiming for the lowest output size, you must make sure that the attacker has the least possibility of succeeding. There are three different output sizes available. Which one do you think I should choose?

Let's say you wish to prevent a hash function clash from being discovered by an attacker. The attacker has the computing power enough to produce 240 hash values. Aiming for the lowest output size, you must make sure that the attacker has the least possibility of succeeding. There are three different output sizes available. Which one do you think I should choose?

Database System Concepts

7th Edition

ISBN:9780078022159

Author:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Publisher:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Chapter1: Introduction

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1PE

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

When compared to other families of secure hash functions (such the SHA family of algorithms), what sets a Key Derivation Function apart? To maximize the likelihood of your message's reception, you should include as much specificity as feasible.
What separates a Key Derivation Function from other families of secure hash functions studied in the past (such as the SHA algorithm family)? Include as much information as possible to ensure that your message is fully understood.
How secure is the OLP approach developed by Lamport, taking into account the qualities that are important to the hash function?
What sets a Key Derivation Function from from other families of secure hash functions (like the SHA family of algorithms) that have been the subject of research? You should include as much detail as possible to ensure that your message is comprehended.
So, how does a Key Derivation Function differ from other studied families of secure hash functions (like the SHA family of algorithms)? Include as much detail as possible to ensure your message is understood.
As compared to other families of secure hash functions (such the SHA family of algorithms), what sets a Key Derivation Function apart? Including as much information as possible will increase the likelihood that your message will be comprehended.
What distinguishes a Key Derivation Function from other researched families of secure hash functions (such as the SHA family of algorithms)? To make sure that your message is well understood, you should include as much information as you can.
Suppose that the size of the hash table is 101. Further suppose that certain keys with the indices 15, 101, 116, 0 and 217 are to be inserted in this order into an initially empty hash table. Using modular arithmetic, find the indices in the hash table if quadratic probing is used?
What sets a Key Derivation Function different from other families of secure hash functions (like the SHA family of algorithms) that have been studied? You should include as much information as you can to ensure that your message is adequately comprehended.
How about encrypting an AES key using a secret password? Extend your justification for why you chose that particular answerKeyed hash functions are compared to hash functions. Check out a sample of a hash function with a single key.
When compared to other families of secure hash functions (such the SHA family of algorithms), what sets a Key Derivation Function apart? If you want your message to have an impact, you need to provide as much specificity as possible.
In what ways can a hash value be secured so as to provide message authentication? Is it necessary to recover the secret key in order to attack a MAC algorithm?