Many people believe that the world of digital technology may be roughly divided into two groups: those who have access to a computer and the Internet, and others who do not. Some people believe that this has substantial ethical implications and that there is a moral obligation to remedy the imbalance. Those who "have nots" may feel discriminated against or socially ostracized, and they miss out on a wide variety of life opportunities as a result. Do you believe that everyone, regardless of where they live, their needs, their level of ability, or their financial means, ought should have access to computers and the Internet? Who is responsible for providing services and education, as well as footing the bill? Why isn't having access to the internet a must for everyone?

Many people believe that the world of digital technology may be roughly divided into two groups: those who have access to a computer and the Internet, and others who do not. Some people believe that this has substantial ethical implications and that there is a moral obligation to remedy the imbalance. Those who "have nots" may feel discriminated against or socially ostracized, and they miss out on a wide variety of life opportunities as a result. Do you believe that everyone, regardless of where they live, their needs, their level of ability, or their financial means, ought should have access to computers and the Internet? Who is responsible for providing services and education, as well as footing the bill? Why isn't having access to the internet a must for everyone?

Information Technology Project Management

9th Edition

ISBN:9781337101356

Author:Kathy Schwalbe

Publisher:Kathy Schwalbe

Chapter10: Project Communications Management

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 3DQ

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Many people believe that the digital world may be roughly divided into two groups: those who have access to computers and the Internet, and those who do not. Some argue that this has serious moral repercussions, and that the disparity must be addressed. Those on the bottom may feel marginalized and deprived of opportunities because of it. Do you believe that everyone, whatever where they live, their financial situation, their level of education, or their level of technological expertise, should have access to computers and the Internet? Whose responsibility is it to provide aid and instruction and whose money will cover the costs? So why isn't universal Internet access a necessity?
In today’s technologically advanced society, is there really privacy? Based on your own personal experiences with social media (Facebook, Twitter, Tik Tok, Instagram, or Snapchat), do you feel that individuals should be held accountable for their actions outside of the workplace? Is it possible that, due to the technological advances in smart phones, tablets, and other communication devices, workplace and personal privacy have meshed together to a point that what was once personal space is now fair game in the hiring and firing practices?
There is a broad spectrum of moral and ethical problems that have been brought to light as a result of the spread of computer technology, information technology, information networks, and the internet. Is there a way out of the predicament that we find ourselves in right now?
According to the findings of a research on patient travel times, trips to the doctor took more time for individuals of color and the unemployed. Another problem that people who live in rural locations face is having access to medical treatment that is of a sufficient standard. Is it feasible that the use of video telemedicine will make healthcare more accessible to populations who are currently underserved? Is there a way that the underprivileged may have access to more healthcare services with the use of this technology?
The ubiquitous nature of mobile phones today brings tremendous convenience to our lives, but will misuse of new improvements to this technology result in the loss of that convenience? For instance, camera phones are now banned in many fitness centres, park restrooms, and other similar facilities because some people have used them inappropriately to take compromising photos, and mobile phones are banned in many classrooms because of the disruption of constant text messaging and the use of the phone by dishonest students to cheat on exams. Do you think these reactions to mobile phone misuse are justified? Is there another way to ensure the appropriate use of mobile phones without banning their use for all individuals? Should there be more stringent consequences for those who use technology for illegal or unethical purposes?
Many people believe that the Internet and computers have created a digital divide between the haves and have-nots of society. Some argue that this has serious moral repercussions and that the gap has to be closed since those on the bottom are being unfairly treated and may feel discriminated against or socially ostracized as a result. Do you believe that everyone, irrespective of where they live, their financial situation, their level of education, or their ability to use computers, should have access to the Internet? Who should provide aid and education and who should foot the bill? Why isn't Internet access mandatory for everyone?
The Impact of Technology on Everyday Life and Culture Is there a middle ground where reasonable arguments may be made?
A luxury can be defined as something that is an indulgence, rather than a necessity. Most people in the world would view items such as food, shelter, and water as necessities. In the United States, many would likely add electricity and indoor plumbing to that list. Today, many individuals are beginning to view Internet access as a necessity. But is it really a necessity—that is, essential for existence? If so, what about the individuals who do not have Internet access or those who choose not to use it? How might the perception of Internet access being or not being a necessity affect the growth of e-commerce?
Is there a correlation between the use of computers and social media and a decline in your and your friends' social skills? I'm interested in hearing your thoughts on this. To what extent does digital communication have positive and negative aspects?
Is having access to the internet beneficial for people with disabilities, regardless of whether those disabilities are mental or physical? What novel forms of medical technology do you see being developed in the not-too-distant future to assist those who need more support? Should the progress being made in assistive technology be made accessible to the general public?
Discuss the means by which people may more readily avoid their moral responsibilities and violate the norms imposed by society. In recent years, new technology advancements have made it simpler for folks to achieve both of these.
The proliferation of computer technology, information technology, information networks, and the internet brings up a wide range of moral and ethical issues. Is there a solution to the problems that we are facing?