Match the left-column statements to the right-column architecture. A server is constantly on. Processes may serve each other. Communication always involves client and server processes. HTTP employs this architecture. Users control hosts, which may go down unexpectedly. Self-scalable. Answer: peer-to-peer. B. Peer-to-peer. Peer-to-peer or client-server. Client-server D. TCP/IP design.

Match the left-column statements to the right-column architecture. A server is constantly on. Processes may serve each other. Communication always involves client and server processes. HTTP employs this architecture. Users control hosts, which may go down unexpectedly. Self-scalable. Answer: peer-to-peer. B. Peer-to-peer. Peer-to-peer or client-server. Client-server D. TCP/IP design.

Principles of Information Security (MindTap Course List)

6th Edition

ISBN:9781337102063

Author:Michael E. Whitman, Herbert J. Mattord

Publisher:Michael E. Whitman, Herbert J. Mattord

Chapter6: Security Technology: Access Controls, Firewalls, And Vpns

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 2RQ

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Match left-column statements to right-column architectures. Always-on server. Processes may provide or receive service. Any communication has a client and server. It's HTTP. User-controlled hosts may be up or down. Self-scalable. A. Peer-to-peer. B. Not client-server or peer-to-peer. C. Client-server/peer-to-peer. D. Client-server. E. TCP/IP.
By way of TELNET, Computer A, for instance, may talk to Computer C. Concurrently, the File Transfer Protocol (FTP) is used for communication between computers A and B. We need a way to identify each process so that they may be fed information concurrently. Can you elaborate on that approach?
One helpful exercise is to weigh the merits of connection-based versus connectionless protocols against one another.
Which two of the following are the most persuasive justifications for layered protocols? Please give supporting proof for your claim.
Which two stacking protocol benefits are most compelling? Provide examples?
An evaluation of TCP and UDP Give two instances of applications where, in your position as a software architect, you would prefer to use TCP over UDP.
Do HTTP streaming's TCP receive buffer and client application buffer match? How do they engage without talking?
TELNET, for example, allows Computer A to interact with Computer C. At the same time, computer A and computer B interact using the File Transfer Protocol (FTP). We need a mechanism to designate the various processes so that they may get data at the same time. Could you describe how you came up with that method?
To what extent do each of the following contribute to the benefits of layered protocols? Explain what you mean by providing some examples.
Two processes CLT and SRV are involved in remote invocation with CLT acting as the client,while SRV acts as the server.(a) Highlight the underlying request-reply protocol using its primitives. (b) The request issued by C was not replied to on time. Explain the steps taken by bothprocessesusing the at-least-once semantics.(c) Explain the steps taken by both processes using the exactly-once semantics when CLT does not receive the response.
What is the address of a private network on the internet? Is it possible that a datagram with an address belonging to a private network may end up on the public Internet as a whole? Explanation.
In favour of layered protocols, what are the two most compelling reasons to do so? An example is needed to support what you are saying.