may be configured to sequence instructions in assembly language in such a manner that a pipeline is exposed to the least amount of risk that is practically possible. This reduces the likelihood of errors occurring. Pipeline design should aim to achieve this as one of its aims. Do all assemblers and compilers rearrange instructions provided in assembly language in the sa

may be configured to sequence instructions in assembly language in such a manner that a pipeline is exposed to the least amount of risk that is practically possible. This reduces the likelihood of errors occurring. Pipeline design should aim to achieve this as one of its aims. Do all assemblers and compilers rearrange instructions provided in assembly language in the sa

Name: Compilers and assemblers may be configured to sequence instructions in
Uploaded: 2024-03-20T06:51:23.000Z
Channel: Bartleby
Description: Compilers and assemblers may be configured to sequence instructions in assembly language in such a manner that a pipeline is exposed to the least amount of risk that is practically possible. This reduces the likelihood of errors occurring. Pipeline d

Systems Architecture

7th Edition

ISBN:9781305080195

Author:Stephen D. Burd

Publisher:Stephen D. Burd

Chapter4: Processor Technology And Architecture

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 2PE: If a microprocessor has a cycle time of 0.5 nanoseconds, what’s the processor clock rate? If the...

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

_____ is a CPU design technique in which instruction execution is divided into multiple stages and different instructions can execute in different stages simultaneously.
Compilers and assemblers have the ability to reorder assembler instructions in order to avoid pipeline dangers to the fullest degree that is practically possible. How similar or how unlike are the approaches used by assemblers and compilers when reordering instructions in assembly language?
It is possible to design compilers and assemblers to order assembly language instructions such that a pipeline is exposed to the least amount of risk possible. One of the objectives of pipeline design is this. Do all assemblers and compilers rearrange instructions provided in assembly language in the same manner to achieve the best degree of productivity?
Compilers and assemblers may be programmed to sequence instructions in assembly language in such a way that a pipeline faces the least amount of risk feasible. This is one of the goals of pipeline design. To reach the highest possible level of productivity, do all assemblers and compilers rearrange instructions written in assembly language in the same way?
Compilers and assemblers can be programmed to sequence assembly language instructions in a way that poses the least risk to a system's pipelines. In fact, achieving this is a primary focus when planning a pipeline. Is it true that all assemblers and compilers rearrange the order of assembly language instructions in the same way?
It is feasible for compilers and assemblers to be built to sequence assembly language instructions in a pipeline in a way that poses the fewest dangers. To achieve optimal efficiency, do all assemblers and compilers rearrange assembly language instructions in the same way?
The order in which assembly language instructions are executed may be programmed into compilers and assemblers so that pipelines are put in the most risk-free position possible. Pipeline design should aim to achieve this as one of its aims. In order to achieve the highest possible level of productivity, do all assemblers and compilers sequence the instructions for assembly language in the same fashion?
It is feasible to set up a pipeline with the least amount of vulnerability using an assembly-language compiler and an assembler. This is one of the goals of pipeline design. When given assembly language code, do all assemblers and compilers reorder the instructions in the same way to maximize efficiency?
It is feasible to design compilers and assemblers to sequence instructions in assembly language in a way that minimizes hazards in a pipeline. Do all assemblers and compilers optimize the order of instructions in assembly language in the same way?
Compilers and assemblers may be designed to sequence assembly language instructions in such a manner that a pipeline has the fewest potential dangers. Do all assemblers and compilers rearrange assembly language instructions in the same manner to achieve maximum efficiency?
Writing compilers and assemblers that rearrange assembly language instructions to minimize pipeline hazards is a way to optimize them. When reordering assembly language instructions, do all assemblers and compilers perform the same optimizations?
Assembler instructions may be rearranged by compilers and assemblers to minimize pipeline hazards to the greatest extent feasible. To what extent do assemblers and compilers reorder instructions in the assembly language in the same way?