ull touch1:28 PM49%Expert Q&ADoneOn January 1, 2010, P Company acquired the net assets of S Company for$1,580,000 cash. The fair value of S Co. identifiable net assets was $1,330,000 onthis date. P Company decided to measure goodwill impairment using the presentvalue of future cash flows to estimate the fair value of the reporting unit (S Co.).The information for these subsequent years is as follows:Carrying value ofS Co. IdentifiableNet Assets$1,160,000$1,120,000Fair ValueS Co. IdentifiableNet AssetsPresent valueof Future Cash Flows$1,400,000$1,390,000* Identifiable net assets do not include goodwill.Year$1,190,000$1,210,00020112012Choose the correct answer:In year 2011 S Company had:O Excess of fair value over carrying value of $10,000O Excess of carrying value over fair value of $10,000O Excess of fair value over carrying value of $20,000Excess of carrying value over fair value of $20,000O None of the options is correct

Given that: For the Year 2011: Acquisition Price 1580000 Fair Value of identifiable net assets…

On January 1, 2010, P Company acquired the net ässets of Company för $1,580,000 cash. The fair value of S Co. identifiable net assets was $1,330,000 on this date. P Company decided to measure goodwill impairment using the present value of future cash flows to estimate the fair value of the reporting unit (S Co.). The information for these subsequent years is as follows Carrying value of S Co. Identifiable Net Assets Fair Value S Co. Identifiable Net Assets Present value of Future Cash Flows $1,400,000 Year $1,190,000 $1,210,000 2011 $1,160,000 2012 $1,390,000 $1,120,000 * Identifiable net assets do not include goodwill.

On January 1, 2010, P Company acquired the net ässets of Company för $1,580,000 cash. The fair value of S Co. identifiable net assets was $1,330,000 on this date. P Company decided to measure goodwill impairment using the present value of future cash flows to estimate the fair value of the reporting unit (S Co.). The information for these subsequent years is as follows Carrying value of S Co. Identifiable Net Assets Fair Value S Co. Identifiable Net Assets Present value of Future Cash Flows $1,400,000 Year $1,190,000 $1,210,000 2011 $1,160,000 2012 $1,390,000 $1,120,000 * Identifiable net assets do not include goodwill.

Purchasing and Supply Chain Management

6th Edition

ISBN:9781285869681

Author:Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. Patterson

Publisher:Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. Patterson

ChapterC: Cases

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 5.3SD: Scenario 4 Sharon Gillespie, a new buyer at Visionex, Inc., was reviewing quotations for a tooling...

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Scenario 4 Sharon Gillespie, a new buyer at Visionex, Inc., was reviewing quotations for a tooling contract submitted by four suppliers. She was evaluating the quotes based on price, target quality levels, and delivery lead time promises. As she was working, her manager, Dave Cox, entered her office. He asked how everything was progressing and if she needed any help. She mentioned she was reviewing quotations from suppliers for a tooling contract. Dave asked who the interested suppliers were and if she had made a decision. Sharon indicated that one supplier, Apex, appeared to fit exactly the requirements Visionex had specified in the proposal. Dave told her to keep up the good work. Later that day Dave again visited Sharons office. He stated that he had done some research on the suppliers and felt that another supplier, Micron, appeared to have the best track record with Visionex. He pointed out that Sharons first choice was a new supplier to Visionex and there was some risk involved with that choice. Dave indicated that it would please him greatly if she selected Micron for the contract. The next day Sharon was having lunch with another buyer, Mark Smith. She mentioned the conversation with Dave and said she honestly felt that Apex was the best choice. When Mark asked Sharon who Dave preferred, she answered, Micron. At that point Mark rolled his eyes and shook his head. Sharon asked what the body language was all about. Mark replied, Look, I know youre new but you should know this. I heard last week that Daves brother-in-law is a new part owner of Micron. I was wondering how soon it would be before he started steering business to that company. He is not the straightest character. Sharon was shocked. After a few moments, she announced that her original choice was still the best selection. At that point Mark reminded Sharon that she was replacing a terminated buyer who did not go along with one of Daves previous preferred suppliers. Ethical decisions that affect a buyers ethical perspective usually involve the organizational environment, cultural environment, personal environment, and industry environment. Analyze this scenario using these four variables.
Scenario 4 Sharon Gillespie, a new buyer at Visionex, Inc., was reviewing quotations for a tooling contract submitted by four suppliers. She was evaluating the quotes based on price, target quality levels, and delivery lead time promises. As she was working, her manager, Dave Cox, entered her office. He asked how everything was progressing and if she needed any help. She mentioned she was reviewing quotations from suppliers for a tooling contract. Dave asked who the interested suppliers were and if she had made a decision. Sharon indicated that one supplier, Apex, appeared to fit exactly the requirements Visionex had specified in the proposal. Dave told her to keep up the good work. Later that day Dave again visited Sharons office. He stated that he had done some research on the suppliers and felt that another supplier, Micron, appeared to have the best track record with Visionex. He pointed out that Sharons first choice was a new supplier to Visionex and there was some risk involved with that choice. Dave indicated that it would please him greatly if she selected Micron for the contract. The next day Sharon was having lunch with another buyer, Mark Smith. She mentioned the conversation with Dave and said she honestly felt that Apex was the best choice. When Mark asked Sharon who Dave preferred, she answered, Micron. At that point Mark rolled his eyes and shook his head. Sharon asked what the body language was all about. Mark replied, Look, I know youre new but you should know this. I heard last week that Daves brother-in-law is a new part owner of Micron. I was wondering how soon it would be before he started steering business to that company. He is not the straightest character. Sharon was shocked. After a few moments, she announced that her original choice was still the best selection. At that point Mark reminded Sharon that she was replacing a terminated buyer who did not go along with one of Daves previous preferred suppliers. What should Sharon do in this situation?
Scenario 4 Sharon Gillespie, a new buyer at Visionex, Inc., was reviewing quotations for a tooling contract submitted by four suppliers. She was evaluating the quotes based on price, target quality levels, and delivery lead time promises. As she was working, her manager, Dave Cox, entered her office. He asked how everything was progressing and if she needed any help. She mentioned she was reviewing quotations from suppliers for a tooling contract. Dave asked who the interested suppliers were and if she had made a decision. Sharon indicated that one supplier, Apex, appeared to fit exactly the requirements Visionex had specified in the proposal. Dave told her to keep up the good work. Later that day Dave again visited Sharons office. He stated that he had done some research on the suppliers and felt that another supplier, Micron, appeared to have the best track record with Visionex. He pointed out that Sharons first choice was a new supplier to Visionex and there was some risk involved with that choice. Dave indicated that it would please him greatly if she selected Micron for the contract. The next day Sharon was having lunch with another buyer, Mark Smith. She mentioned the conversation with Dave and said she honestly felt that Apex was the best choice. When Mark asked Sharon who Dave preferred, she answered, Micron. At that point Mark rolled his eyes and shook his head. Sharon asked what the body language was all about. Mark replied, Look, I know youre new but you should know this. I heard last week that Daves brother-in-law is a new part owner of Micron. I was wondering how soon it would be before he started steering business to that company. He is not the straightest character. Sharon was shocked. After a few moments, she announced that her original choice was still the best selection. At that point Mark reminded Sharon that she was replacing a terminated buyer who did not go along with one of Daves previous preferred suppliers. What does the Institute of Supply Management code of ethics say about financial conflicts of interest?
Alicia Wong Alicia Wong, Corporate Supply Manager, Thain Foods Limited, wanted to prepare a proposal to manufacture mustard in-house. Mustard, an important ingredient in many of the company’s products, was currently purchased from an outside supplier. She hoped a comprehensive proposal could be prepared in one-month’s time for the CEO’s approval Thain Foods Limited (TFL) had been in business for morethan 30 years. Its products included a wide range of syrupsfudges, cone dips, sauces, mayonnaise, and salad dressings. Its customers were major food chains, hotels, and restaurants in North America and Europe. TFL believed in continuous improvement to its operations. Over the last two years, it invested more than $2 million in plant facilities, the bulk of it new, state-ofthe-art process equipment and process control. All production and process control functions were computerized for maximum efficiency. TFL employed about 120 people. It had a corporate structure of CEO; president; executive…
Alicia Wong Alicia Wong, Corporate Supply Manager, Thain Foods Limited, wanted to prepare a proposal to manufacture mustard in-house. Mustard, an important ingredient in many of the company’s products, was currently purchased from an outside supplier. She hoped a comprehensive proposal could be prepared in one-month’s time for the CEO’s approval Thain Foods Limited (TFL) had been in business for morethan 30 years. Its products included a wide range of syrupsfudges, cone dips, sauces, mayonnaise, and salad dressings. Its customers were major food chains, hotels, and restaurants in North America and Europe. TFL believed in continuous improvement to its operations. Over the last two years, it invested more than $2 million in plant facilities, the bulk of it new, state-ofthe-art process equipment and process control. All production and process control functions were computerized for maximum efficiency. TFL employed about 120 people. It had a corporate structure of CEO; president; executive…
6/ Mr Hamed is working as a financial manager in a company he has to submit a repost on sales performance of company to the top management. He depended on internal sources to collect data and prepare repost. Which of the following sources helpful to collect data and a prepare report? a. Data from marketing department b. Data from government c. Data directly collected from the origin of item d. Data from news papers
Rubatex Corporation manufactures rubber and foam for a variety of products, including artificial turf housing and insulation, hockey helmet liners, scuba diving suits, sports sandals and mouse pads. The company was purchased by an investment firm called American industrial partners (AIP) that has so far earned only a 1 percent return on its investment. Obviously the company is having problems. Its sales are up but earnings are down. In the first three months after acquisition, the company lost $2 million on $68 million in sales. Understandably, AIP wants to know why and is demanding aggressive action. Employees at the Bedford, Virginia, plant say they know something’s wrong. The plant is hot and dirty and crumbling, and they are working harder to produce items of poorer quality. Fewer than 7 of 10 orders are shipped on time, and 2% of sales are returned as defective. Built in 1924, the plant sprawls over 14 buildings, with only the offices and lunchroom air-conditioned. Equipment is…