On January 1, 2013, Laity Company purchased a patent with a cost of P5,200,000 and a useful life of ten years. On December 31, 2014, the entity determined that impairment indicators were present. The fair value less cost of disposal of the patent was estimated to be P3,600,000. The, value in use is estimated to be P3,800,000. What amount should be reported as impairment loss for 2014?

On January 1, 2013, Laity Company purchased a patent with a cost of P5,200,000 and a useful life of ten years. On December 31, 2014, the entity determined that impairment indicators were present. The fair value less cost of disposal of the patent was estimated to be P3,600,000. The, value in use is estimated to be P3,800,000. What amount should be reported as impairment loss for 2014?

Name: On January 1, 2013, Laity Company purchased a patent with a cost of P
Uploaded: 2024-03-05T11:50:36.000Z
Channel: Bartleby
Description: On January 1, 2013, Laity Company purchased a patent with a cost of P5,200,000 and a useful life of ten years. On December 31, 2014, the entitydetermined that impairment indicators were present'. The fair value less cost of disposal of the patent wa

Principles of Accounting Volume 1

19th Edition

ISBN:9781947172685

Author:OpenStax

Publisher:OpenStax

Chapter11: Long-term Assets

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 11PB: On May 1, 2015, Zoe Inc. purchased Branta Corp. for $15,000,000 in cash. They only received...

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

On May 1, 2015, Zoe Inc. purchased Branta Corp. for $15,000,000 in cash. They only received $12,000,000 in net assets. In 2016, the market value of the goodwill obtained from Branta Corp. was valued at $4,000,000, but in 2017 it dropped to $2,000,000. Prepare the journal entry for the creation of goodwill and the entry to record any impairments to it in subsequent years.
At the end of 2020, Magenta Manufacturing Company discovered that construction cost had been capitalized as a cost of the factory building in 2015 when it should have been treated as a cost of production equipment installation costs. As a result of the misclassification, the depreciation through 2018 was understated by 110,000, and depreciation for 2019 was understated by 90,000. What would be the consequences of correcting for the misclassification of the property cost? a. The taxpayer uses the FIFO inventory method, and 25% of goods produced during the period were included in the ending inventory. b. The taxpayer uses the LIFO inventory method, and no new LIFO layer was added during 2019.
On July 1, 2018, Mundo Corporation purchased factory equipment for 50,000. Residual value was estimated at 2,000. The equipment will be depreciated over 10 years using the double-declining balance method. Counting the year of acquisition as one-half year, Mundo should record 2019 depredation expense of: a. 7,680 b. 9,000 c. 9,600 d. 10,000
The following are independent errors: a. In January 2019, repair costs of 9,000 were debited to the Machinery account. At the beginning of 2019, the book value of the machinery was 100,000. No residual value is expected, the remaining estimated life is 10 years, and straight-line depreciation is used. b. All purchases of materials for construction contracts still in progress have been immediately expensed. It is discovered that the use of these materials was 10,000 during 2018 and 12,000 during 2019. c. Depreciation on manufacturing equipment has been excluded from manufacturing costs and treated as a period expense. During 2019, 40,000 of depreciation was accounted for in that manner. Production was 15,000 units during 2019, of which 3,000 remained in inventory at the end of the year. Assume there was no inventory at the beginning of 2019. Required: Prepare journal entries for the preceding errors discovered during 2020. Ignore income taxes.
During 2019, White Company determined that machinery previously depreciated over a 7-year life had a total estimated useful life of only 5 years. An accounting change was made in 2019 to reflect the change in estimate. If the change had been made in 2018, accumulated depreciation at December 31, 2018, would have been 1,600,000 instead of 1,200,000. As a result of this change, the 2019 depreciation expense was 100,000 greater than it would have been if no change were made. Ignoring income tax considerations, what is the proper amount of the adjustment to Whites January 1, 2019, balance of retained earnings? a. 0 b. 100,000 c. 280,000 d. 400,000