On January 1,2020, ABC Company insured the life of its president for P 7,000,000, with an annual premium of P 150,000 payable in advance at the beginning of each year. The company is the designated beneficiary and has the right to cancel the policy at its own option The cash surrender value of the policy at the end of each year is as follows: 2020- PO 2021- 0 2022- 50,000 2023 - 68,000 2024- 98,000 The president died on April 1,2023 and ABC Company's accounting year is the calendar year. How much is the life insurance expense for the year ended December 31,2023? * O P 27,500 O P 19,500 O P 94,500 O P 150,000

On January 1,2020, ABC Company insured the life of its president for P 7,000,000, with an annual premium of P 150,000 payable in advance at the beginning of each year. The company is the designated beneficiary and has the right to cancel the policy at its own option The cash surrender value of the policy at the end of each year is as follows: 2020- PO 2021- 0 2022- 50,000 2023 - 68,000 2024- 98,000 The president died on April 1,2023 and ABC Company's accounting year is the calendar year. How much is the life insurance expense for the year ended December 31,2023? * O P 27,500 O P 19,500 O P 94,500 O P 150,000

Intermediate Accounting: Reporting And Analysis

3rd Edition

ISBN:9781337788281

Author:James M. Wahlen, Jefferson P. Jones, Donald Pagach

Publisher:James M. Wahlen, Jefferson P. Jones, Donald Pagach

Chapter13: Investments And Long-term Receivables

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 25E

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

On January 1, 2019, Boater Company issues a 20,000 non-interest-bearing, 5-year note for equipment. Neither the fair value of the note nor the equipment is determinable. Boaters incremental borrowing rate is 9%. The asset has a useful life of 7 years. Prepare the journal entry for Boater to record the issuance of the note on January 1.
On January 1, 2019, Mopps Corp. agrees to provide Conklin Company 3 years of cleaning and janitorial services. The contract sets the price at 12,000 per year, which is the normal standalone price that Mopps charges. On December 31, 2020, Mopps and Conklin agree to modify the contract. Mopps reduces the fee for the third year to 10,000, and Conklin agrees to a 4-year extension that will extend services through December 31, 2024, at a price of 15,000 per year. At the time that the contract is modified, Mopps is charging other customers 13,500 for the cleaning and janitorial service. Required: Should Mopps and Conklin treat the modification as a separate contract? If so how should Mopps account for the contract modification on December 31, 2020? Support your opinion by discussing the application to this case of the factors that need to be considered for determining the accounting for contract modifications.
On January 1, 2019, Northfield Corporation becomes delinquent on a 100,000, 14% note to First National Bank, on which 16,651 of interest has accrued. On January 2, 2019, the bank agrees to restructure the note. It forgives the accrued interest, extends the repayment date to December 31, 2021, and reduces the interest rate to 10%. Required: Prepare a schedule for Northfield to compute the annual interest expense in regard to the preceding note for each year of the restructuring agreement.
On October 1, 2019, Grahams WeedFeed Inc. signs a contract to maintain the grounds for BigData Corp. The contract ends on March 31, 2020, and has a monthly payment of 3,200. The contract does not include any stipulations for additional periods. On June 1, Grahams WeedFeed and BigData sign a new 12-month contract that is retroactive to April 1, 2020. The monthly fee for the new contract is 4,000 per month and is also retroactive to April 1, 2020. During April and May of 2020, while the new contract was being negotiated, Grahams Weed Feed continued to maintain the grounds, and BigData continued to pay 3,200 per month. BigData was satisfied with Grahams WeedFeeds performance, and the only issue during negotiations was the monthly fee. Required: Determine if a valid contract exists between Grahams WeedFeed and BigData during April and May 2020.
On January 1, 2019, Brewster Company issued 2,000 of its 5-year, 1,000 face value, 11% bonds dated January 1 at an effective annual interest rate (yield) of 9%. Brewster uses the effective interest method of amortization. On December 31, 2023, Brewster extinguished the 2,000 bonds early through acquisition in the open market for 1,980,000. On July 1, 2022, Brewster issued 5,000 of its 6-year, 1,000 face value, 10% convertible bonds dated July 1 at an effective annual interest rate (yield) of 12%. The bonds are convertible at the option of the investor into Brewsters common stock at a ratio of 10 shares of common stock for each bond. Brewster uses the effective interest method of amortization. On July 1, 2023, an investor in Brewsters convertible bonds tendered 1,500 bonds for conversion into 15,000 shares of Brewsters common stock, which had a market value of 105 per share at the date of the conversion. Required: 1. Using the information about Brewster, answer the following questions: a. Were the 11% bonds issued at par, at a discount, or at a premium? Why? b. Is the amount of interest expense for the 11% bonds using the effective interest method of amortization higher in the first or second year of the life of the bond issue? Why? 2. Using the information about Brewster, explain the following: a. How is a gain or loss on early extinguishment of debt determined? Does the early extinguishment of the 11% bonds result in a gain or loss? Why? b. How does Brewster report the early extinguishment of the 11% bonds on the 2023 income statement? 3. Based on the information provided about Brewster, answer the following questions: a. Does recording the conversion of the 10% convertible bonds into common stock under the book value method affect net income? What is the rationale for the book value method? b. Does recording the conversion of the 10% convertible bonds into common stock under the market value method affect net income? What is the rationale for the market value method?