(only the questions below)What more would you need to know to decide fairly if Jessalyn would be as safe as the boys in the camp in Ropes & Branches? What policy change, if any, would you urge the owners to introduce?If Jessalyn asks why she can’t do Ropes & Branches, how should Dave answer? Should he tell her the truth behind the owners’ decision or hide it?If the owners don’t change their minds, what would you advise Dave to do? Pré-visualizaçãoFicheiroEdiçãoVisualizaçãoIrFerramentasJanelaAjudaDom. 20 de fev. 3:30 PMRobert S. Feldman - Child Development_ A Topical Approach (2013, Pearson) - lib...Página 176 de 609Q PesquisaRobert S. Feld...The CASEof ... Girls Don't154Jessalyn Palmer's father Dave was baffled. Jessalyn, nearly 5, hadbeen denied admission to the Ropes & Branches course at a Na-tive American camp she wanted to attend, and had been assignedknew, were good and fair people, but perhaps their Native Ameri-can heritage was guiding their decision.Caught between culture and his daughter's disappointment,instead to Beads and Baskets.Dave didn't know what to do.Jessalyn didn't want to make necklaces and baskets; shewanted to tie knots and make rope ladders and fashion slings andfly from branch to branch with the boys in Ropes & Branches. Shehad always been an active child, heedless of her body and happyto laugh off any hurts or bruises she earned as a result.Dave Palmer begged the couple who ran the camp to allowJessalyn to switch courses, but they were adamant. It would betoo dangerous for her. It demanded too much brute strength andagility. Girls were better at finger skills like weaving and beading.Jessalyn would hurt herself on the ropes. They couldn't risk that.Dave was certain they were exaggerating the risk. The campwas well staffed and had a perfect safety record. He protested thatJessalyn was as strong and agile as any boy in the course and herrisk was no greater than theirs. But the owners were unmoved.When the husband remarked "Girls don't tie knots," Dave sensedthat this was more than a personal judgment. The camp owners, heGiven what you know about boys' and girls' physical characteris-tics at age 5, how can Dave make a case that Jessalyn's strengthand agility matched those of the boys her age in the camp?1552. Could the camp owners be right about assigning Jessalyn toBeads & Baskets based on girls' superior fine motor skills? Arethey justified in denying her admission to the more physicalcourse that boys usually take?3. What more would you need to know to decide fairly if Jessalynwould be as safe as the boys in the camp in Ropes & Branches?What policy change, if any, would you urge the owners to introduce?1564. If Jessalyn asks why she can't do Ropes & Branches, how shouldDave answer? Should he tell her the truth behind the owners'decision or hide it?The CE5. If the owners don't change their minds, what would you adviseDave to do?« LOOKINE BACK157talked about in56FEV.20étv N li17IGTne MOST sense in

Question

(only the questions below)What more would you need to know to decide fairly if Jessalyn would be as safe as the boys in the camp in Ropes & Branches? What policy change, if any, would you urge the owners to introduce?If Jessalyn asks why she can’t do Ropes & Branches, how should Dave answer? Should he tell her the truth behind the owners’ decision or hide it?If the owners don’t change their minds, what would you advise Dave to do? Pré-visualizaçãoFicheiroEdiçãoVisualizaçãoIrFerramentasJanelaAjudaDom. 20 de fev. 3:30 PMRobert S. Feldman - Child Development_ A Topical Approach (2013, Pearson) - lib...Página 176 de 609Q PesquisaRobert S. Feld...The CASEof ... Girls Don't154Jessalyn Palmer's father Dave was baffled. Jessalyn, nearly 5, hadbeen denied admission to the Ropes & Branches course at a Na-tive American camp she wanted to attend, and had been assignedknew, were good and fair people, but perhaps their Native Ameri-can heritage was guiding their decision.Caught between culture and his daughter's disappointment,instead to Beads and Baskets.Dave didn't know what to do.Jessalyn didn't want to make necklaces and baskets; shewanted to tie knots and make rope ladders and fashion slings andfly from branch to branch with the boys in Ropes & Branches. Shehad always been an active child, heedless of her body and happyto laugh off any hurts or bruises she earned as a result.Dave Palmer begged the couple who ran the camp to allowJessalyn to switch courses, but they were adamant. It would betoo dangerous for her. It demanded too much brute strength andagility. Girls were better at finger skills like weaving and beading.Jessalyn would hurt herself on the ropes. They couldn't risk that.Dave was certain they were exaggerating the risk. The campwas well staffed and had a perfect safety record. He protested thatJessalyn was as strong and agile as any boy in the course and herrisk was no greater than theirs. But the owners were unmoved.When the husband remarked &#34;Girls don't tie knots,&#34; Dave sensedthat this was more than a personal judgment. The camp owners, heGiven what you know about boys' and girls' physical characteris-tics at age 5, how can Dave make a case that Jessalyn's strengthand agility matched those of the boys her age in the camp?1552. Could the camp owners be right about assigning Jessalyn toBeads & Baskets based on girls' superior fine motor skills? Arethey justified in denying her admission to the more physicalcourse that boys usually take?3. What more would you need to know to decide fairly if Jessalynwould be as safe as the boys in the camp in Ropes & Branches?What policy change, if any, would you urge the owners to introduce?1564. If Jessalyn asks why she can't do Ropes & Branches, how shouldDave answer? Should he tell her the truth behind the owners'decision or hide it?The CE5. If the owners don't change their minds, what would you adviseDave to do?« LOOKINE BACK157talked about in56FEV.20étv N li17IGTne MOST sense in

Accepted Answer

The Case of the Girls Dave Palmer, Jessalyn Palmer's father, was perplexed. Jessalyn, who was…