In clear assembly. code .data language Question 1:What will be the final value of eax in this example:mov eax, 0mov ecx, 10 ; outer loop counter1.2.3. L1:4.mov edx, ecx5.mov eax, 36.mov ecx,5; inner loop counter7. L2:8.add eax, 59.loop L2 ; repeat inner loop10.sub ecx, еаx11.mov ecx, edxwww12. loop L1 ; repeat outer loop

Question 1: What will be the final value of eax in this example: mov eax, 0 mov ecx, 10 ; outer loop counter 1. 2. 3. L1: mov edx, ecx mov eax, 3 mov ecx,5 ; inner loop counter 4. 5. 6. 7. L2: 8. add eax,5 9. loop L2 ; repeat inner loop 10. sub ecx, еаx 11. mov ecx, edx www w 12. loop L1 ; repeat outer loop

Question 1: What will be the final value of eax in this example: mov eax, 0 mov ecx, 10 ; outer loop counter 1. 2. 3. L1: mov edx, ecx mov eax, 3 mov ecx,5 ; inner loop counter 4. 5. 6. 7. L2: 8. add eax,5 9. loop L2 ; repeat inner loop 10. sub ecx, еаx 11. mov ecx, edx www w 12. loop L1 ; repeat outer loop

Database System Concepts

7th Edition

ISBN:9780078022159

Author:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Publisher:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Chapter1: Introduction

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1PE

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

What will be the contents of EAX and EDX after the following operation?mov eax,123400hmov edx,0mov ebx,10hdiv ebx
1- What is the optimal mutual exclusion strategy in OpenMP if a critical section looks like x += b;? Assume there are no other crucial portions in the program. a. lock b. critical section c. atomic 2- What is the optimal mutual exclusion strategy in OpenMP if a critical part looks like x += c; y+=b;? Assume there are no other crucial portions in the program. a. lock b. critical section c. atomic 3- In OpenMP, we can't always tell how many crucial sections are in a program just by glancing at the source code. a. True b. False 4- Let's say we want to start a kernel with the following command: kernelname 4,4>>> (argument list...);Let's say the kernel has a global variable called x. How many x instances will there be? a. 16 b. 4 c. 8 d. 1 e. 2
Given loop: LOOP: LDUR X10, [X1, #0] LDUR X11, [X1, #8] ADD X12, X10, X11 SUBI X1, X1, #16 CBNZ X12, LOOP 1) Assume that perfect branch prediction is used (no stall due to control hazard), that has full forwarding support, and that branches are resolved in ID stage. Show a pipeline execution time diagram for the first two iterations of this loop. 2) Assume branches are predicted as not-taken (but actually taken) the first time and predicted taken (but actually not-taken) the second time. Assume full forwarding support and that branches are resolved in EX stage. Show the execution time diagram for the first two iterations of this loop.
Given our 5-stage pipeline with the hardware support for forwarding and stall to deal with data hazards and the following codes: Add $1, $2, $2 Lw $3, 0($4) And $5, $1, $3 Sub $6, $5, $7 Lw $6, 0($8) Sw $6, 0($5) (1) Find all data dependencies such as “on $1 from Add to And” (2) Among all data dependencies, which ones will result in data hazards (that need forwarding and/or stall to deal with)? (3) Draw multiple-clock-cycle diagram (F,D,X,M,W) to show the actual execution of the codes on the pipeline (in case of load-use hazard, the pipeline should stall properly) 4) Draw all data forwarding paths on the diagram (5) For each forwarding path, label its type (M-to-X, X-to-X, etc.).
Consider the following program segment: START: LDUR X10, [X1, #0] LDURX11, [X1, #8] ADDX12, X10, X11 SUBIX1, X1, #16 CBNZX12, START Let us assume there is no control hazard. a. Is there a data Hazard? Identify the instructions that are involved with that hazard if any. b. Show a five stages pipeline execution diagram for the first two iterations of the above program segment. c. Mark the pipeline stages that do not perform useful work.
4.25 Consider the following loop. LOOP: lw $s0, 0($s3) lw $s1, 8($s3) add $s2, $s0, $s1 addi $s3, $s3, -16 bnez $s2, LOOP Assume that perfect branch prediction is used (no stalls due to control hazards), that there are no delay slots, that the pipeline has full forwarding support, and that branches are resolved in the EX (as opposed to the ID) stage. 4.25.1 [10] <§4.8> Show a pipeline execution diagram for the first two iterations of this loop. Mark pipeline stages that do not perform useful work.
Consider the following loop. Loop: lw $t0, 0($t1) and $s6, $s2, $t0 lw $t9, 0($s6) lw $t8, 0($s6) beq $t8, $t9, loop Assume that perfect branch prediction is used (no stalls due to control hazards), that there are no delay slots, and that the pipeline has full forwarding support. Also, assume that many iterations of this loop are executed before the loop exits. Show a pipeline execution diagram for the third iteration of this loop, from the cycle in which we fetch the first instruction of that iteration up to (but not including) the cycle in which we can fetch the first instruction of the next iteration. Show all instructions that are in the pipeline during the cycles (not just the third iteration).
4.25 Consider the following loop. LOOP: LDUR X10, [X1, #0] LDUR X11, [X1, #8] ADD X12, X10, X11 SUBI X1, X1, #16 CBNZ X12, LOOP Question) Assume that perfect branch prediction is used (no stall due to control hazard), that it has full forwarding support, and that branches are resolved in the ID stage. Show a pipeline execution time diagram for the first two iterations of this loop. please explain with IF,ID,EX, MEM,WB figure thank you
a. Describe the dining philosopher's problem and suggest any three ways to solve the problem without any starvation or deadlocksb. What are the necessary and sufficient conditions for a deadlock to take place? Describe each conditionc. Describe a semaphore and the wait() and signal() methods associated with a semaphored. How would you use a semaphore to achieve mutual exclusion?
The term "communication network" may also refer to WSNs. Nodes in a WSN collect data from sensors and relay it to other nodes and a central hub. The computing resources and storage space of a sensor node are limited. Let's think about an algorithm that can be decomposed into simpler issues. To solve these subproblems at separate sensor nodes, would you prefer use divide and conquer or dynamic programming? Use succinct language.
Assume the following parameters for a shadow paging system. TLB Misses per1000 Instructions NPT TLB MissLatency Page Faults per1000 Instructions Shadowing PageFault Overhead 0.2 200 cycles 0.001 30,000 cycles For a benchmark with native execution CPI of 1, what are the CPI numbers if using shadow page tables vs. NPT (assuming only page table virtualization overhead)? What techniques can be used to reduce page table shadowing induced overhead? What techniques can be used to reduce NPT induced overhead?
a single process, with execution time of BT time units, is detected by the system that uses Round Robin algorithm with time quantum of QT time units. Every time the time quantum elapses; a contect switch is always performed with CS time units. Assume that the process come at time equal to zero(0) If BT is 25, QT is 10 and CS is 2, what is the Cpu utilization of the system? If BT is 20, QT is 6 and CS is 1 what is the CPU utilization of the system? What is the CPU utilization if BT is equal QT and QT is equal to CS? What is the system's throughput if BT is less than QT? What is the system's turnaround time (TAT) if BT is less than QT?