Please help me answer the following questions QUESTION 6There will be three tables after converting the following conceptual diagram into the physical model.OH FieldYField1Field2FieldZO TrueO FalseQUESTION 7Given the relation R(C, D, E, F) and functional dependency:C-> DFWhich of the following functional dependencies can you derive using decomposition?O D-> CO C> DO C-> FO F-> CO DF -> CO E-> E

6) Answer :-- False It will converted into two table table A with two fields named field1 and…

QUESTION 6 There will be three tables after converting the following conceptual diagram into the physical model. A -OHFieldY FieldZ Fieldi Field2 O True O False QUESTION 7 Given the relation R(C, D, E, F) and functional dependency: C-> DF Which of the following functional dependencies can you derive using decomposition? O D-> C O C-> D O C-> F O F-> C O DF -> C O E-> E

QUESTION 6 There will be three tables after converting the following conceptual diagram into the physical model. A -OHFieldY FieldZ Fieldi Field2 O True O False QUESTION 7 Given the relation R(C, D, E, F) and functional dependency: C-> DF Which of the following functional dependencies can you derive using decomposition? O D-> C O C-> D O C-> F O F-> C O DF -> C O E-> E

Database System Concepts

7th Edition

ISBN:9780078022159

Author:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Publisher:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Chapter1: Introduction

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1PE

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

A weak entity set can always be made into a strong entity set by adding to its attributes the primary-key attributes of its identifying entity set. Outline what sort of redundancy will result if we do so.
Question 1: Normalization PLEASE WRITE ELIGIBLE AND SHOW FULL STEPS FOR DIAGRAM TO DECOMPOSE Consider a relation X with six attributes WYSMFE where WS is a composite primary key for X. Assume X has the following functional dependencies (X is one table with the attributes W, Y, S, M, F, E): WS è YMFE S è YME E è M Is it possible to decompose X into a number of relations in order to achieve a higher normal form? Explain how (this means using English sentences and a diagram showing the final relation(s)).
Distinguish between the ways in which functional dependencies may be utilized to express the following: • Between the entity sets student and teacher, there is a one-to-one relationship set that exists.• There is a many-to-one connection set between the entity setsstudent and teacher, which is defined as
Strongen a weak entity set by adding primary key attributes. Please explain our choice's overlap.
Consider the following relation with set of functional dependenciesR(ABCDEF)ABC->D, ABD->E, CD->F, CDF->B, BF->Da) Identify the candidate key(s) in the relation with proper steps followed. Explain in detail b) Identify which normal form this relation is in and reason for the answer. Explain in detail Please answer these question in detail with full steps. I need a proper long answer. Thanks
Consider the following relation with set of functional dependenciesR(ABCDEF)ABC->D, ABD->E, CD->F, CDF->B, BF->D a) Identify the candidate key(s) in the relation with proper steps pointwise followed. [Line by Line Detail Explanation] b) Identify which normal form this relation is in and reason for the answer. [Line by Line Detail Explanation] I need a proper long answer please... Thanks in advance...
Describe how functional dependencies may be used to denote the following:• The entity sets student and teacher have a one-to-one relationship set.• There is a many-to-one connection set between the entity sets student and teacher.
You are given a relation R with the following attributes R(A,B,C,D,E). Assume that you were given the following functional dependencies: • FD1= AB -> E • FD2: = D -> C (a) What is a valid key for this relation? justify your response. (b) Is this relation in 3NF (Third Normal Form)? Justify your response. If it is not in 3NF, normalize the relation and demonstrate all steps of normalization.
how to graphically identify an entity, a the cardinality (o,N), a weak relation ship, and a strong relationship in a Crow's Foot ntation?
We can convert any weak entity set to a strong entity set by simply adding appropriate attributes. Why, then,do we have weak entity sets? (a) We want to avoid the data duplication and consequent possible inconsis- tencies caused by duplicating the keyof the strong entity set.(b) Weak entities reflect the logical structure of an entity being dependent on another entity.(c) Weak entities can be deleted automatically when their strong entity is deleted.(d) All of the above.
Functional Dependencies and Normalization Exercise 1: Consider the following relation: Stock(#prod, #dep, pname, quantity) Determine the functional dependencies on Stock. For each of them, explain what they mean in plain English. Is Stock 3NF? Is Stock BCNF? Exercise 2: Consider the following relation: Plane(#plane, type, constructor, capacity, owner) Determine the functional dependencies on Plane. For each of them, explain what they mean in plain English. Is Plane 3NF? Is Plane BCNF? Exercise 3: Compute the attribute closure of XZA with respect to the following set of dependencies: F = {XZ => ZYB, YA -> GC, C -> W, B -> G, XZ -> G} Is the dependency XZA -> YB implied by F? Hint: Use the Armstrong axioms. Exercise 4: What are the properties of the BCNF decomposition algorithm? Explain lossless and dependency preservation with your own words. Apply the decomposition algorithm on Stock.
A weak entity set may always be made stronger by adding the primary-key attributes of its identifying entity set to its attributes. Give an example of the kind of redundancy that will come from our choices.